Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net -404. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50,450–50,976 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 23:26
50,511
-10
5 Nov 2026, 03:04
50,521
-14
4 Nov 2026, 04:10
50,535
-1
3 Nov 2026, 04:59
50,536
-19
2 Nov 2026, 02:20
50,555
-6
1 Nov 2026, 02:46
50,561
-9
30 Oct 2026, 23:35
50,570
-14
29 Oct 2026, 21:51
50,584
+33
28 Oct 2026, 22:50
50,551
-6
28 Oct 2026, 00:16
50,557
-7
26 Oct 2026, 23:16
50,564
-8
25 Oct 2026, 23:36
50,572
-6
25 Oct 2026, 01:20
50,578
-3
23 Oct 2026, 23:44
50,581
-10
23 Oct 2026, 02:38
50,591
-4
22 Oct 2026, 00:19
50,595
+1
20 Oct 2026, 16:56
50,594
-12
19 Oct 2026, 14:08
50,606
-6
18 Oct 2026, 17:26
50,612
+1
17 Oct 2026, 14:18
50,611
first reading
Engagement
61 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.61%
avg views ÷ 50,511 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,340
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 61 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
61 (24 June 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
50,060
Reactions total
502
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 18:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
34s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,393 reactions across 58 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,065
44.5%
❤
768
32.1%
👍
557
23.3%
🤔
2
0.084%
😎
1
0.042%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,393 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Дайджест: реформа
В этой рубрике я рассказываю, зачем нужна реформа бухучета и как она продвигается. В дайджест вытащил не все выпуски, а только те, которые не утратили актуальность. Остальные можно найти по хэштегу #реформа.
Синие ссылки кликабельны:
👉 Зачем нужна реформа бухучета
👉 Мифы о реформе бухучета. Часть 1. Часть 2. Часть 3
👉 Как разрабатываются и утверждаются ФСБУ
👉 Уровни бухгалтерской нормативки
👉 Ка…
11 ноября Авито Услуги соберут юристов и бухгалтеров на бизнес-встречу в Москве
В программе:
🔸 Где искать новых клиентов? Разберут спрос на юридические и бухгалтерские услуги и инструменты для привлечения заказчиков
🔸 Как выделиться среди конкурентов? Обсудят маркетинговые инструменты и способы продвижения профессиональных услуг
🔸 Какие кейсы уже работают? Своим опытом продвижения поделятся реальные представители и…
Каналу 8 лет!
3 ноября 2018 года я создал ТГ-канал «Переводчик с бухгалтерского», а на следующий день в нем появился первый содержательный пост, в котором я рассказывал о мифах про бухучет.
Изначально канал создавался как отдушина препода, которому пришлось оставить академическую карьеру, чтобы зарабатывать деньги, а желание подушнить на тему бухучета никуда не делось. С тех пор много воды утекло: я полностью прекр…
Продолжаю совместную со Smartway серию прямых эфиров по новым ФСБУ. В этот раз разберу ситуации, в которых бухгалтеры часто допускают ошибки при учете аренды по ФСБУ 25/2018:
👉 Как корректно определить срок аренды для бухгалтерского учета
👉 Какие нюансы важно отразить в отчетности при изменениях сроков и стоимости аренды
👉 Как учесть неотделимые улучшения предмета аренды
👉 Когда аренду жилья в командировке нужно учи…
Понедельничный #опрос. Сегодня в формате бухгалтерской викторины. Организация оказывала услуги с декабря прошлого года по февраль отчетного года. Контрагент получал и потреблял выгоды по мере оказания услуг. Когда признать выручку по ФСБУ 9/2025?
Всю в отчетном году10%
Часть в прошлом году, часть в отчетном году62%
Часть в прошлом году, часть в отчетном году или всю в прошлом году9%
Часть в прошлом году, часть в отчетном году или всю в отчетном году19%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Контроль в бухгалтерском учете
Внимание! Градус душноты этого поста превышает среднее значение за историю наблюдений. Если вы не бухгалтер — смело пролистывайте.
С 2027 года ФСБУ 9/2025 «Доходы» становится обязательным. Если вы регулярно читаете мой канал, то точно знаете об этом. Но сегодня я хочу не напомнить о своем курсе по применению этого стандарта (надо брать!), а разобрать понятие, которое теперь играет кл…
Как устроен отчет о финансовых результатах
Во второй серии третьего сезона сериала «Что-то на бухгалтерском» расскажу о второй главной форме финансовой отчетности. Иногда его так и называют: «форма №2». Этот псевдоним прилип в начале века, потому что так отчет нумеровался в Приказе Минфина №67н «О формах бухгалтерской отчетности организаций», который действовал до 2011 года. Еще один псевдоним — отчет о прибылях и у…
Понимаете ли вы бухгалтерские термины? Выпуск 61
Проверьте свои знания в области бухгалтерской терминологии. Шестьдесят первый выпуск посвящен событиям после отчетной даты. По ссылке нужно запустить бота, и традиционные пять вопросов будут появляться один за другим. На каждый ответ дается минута. В конце тестирования можно увидеть свои результаты относительно других ответивших.
Если ответили на вопрос неправильно,…
Когда списать себестоимость запасов при признании выручки по ФСБУ 9/2025
В свежем номере журнала «Главбух» вышел очередной выпуск моей рубрики: «ФСБУ на практике», в которой я рассказываю о нюансах применения новых стандартов. Рубрика выходит в свободном доступе.
Продолжаю разбирать ФСБУ 9/2025 «Доходы»: рассказываю о его взаимодействии с, казалось бы, давно знакомым ФСБУ 5/2019 «Запасы» (а я его еще проектом помню…
Счет 77 «Отложенные налоговые обязательства»
Продолжаю переводить План счетов бухгалтерского учета финансово-хозяйственной деятельности организаций на русский язык. Сегодня расскажу о счете 77. Напоминаю, что если значение термина непонятно, а он написан синим шрифтом — смело кликайте на него, и окажетесь в посте с объяснением.
Зачем этот счет
Счет 77 используется для учета отложенных налоговых обязательств (ОНО)…
👍15❤11🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @accwhisper. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@accwhisper edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
7 September 2026
Most recent edit
7 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 13 posts on @accwhisper as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
2 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
10 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
4
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Понедельничный #опрос. Сегодня в формате бухгалтерской викторины. Организация оказывала услуги с декабря прошлого года по февраль отчетного года. Контрагент получал и потреблял выгоды по мере оказания услуг. Когда признать выручку по ФСБУ 9/2025?
Всю в отчетном году10%
Часть в прошлом году, часть в отчетном году62%
Часть в прошлом году, часть в отчетном году или всю в прошлом году9%
Часть в прошлом году, часть в отчетном году или всю в отчетном году19%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Понедельничный #опрос. Сегодня в формате бухгалтерской викторины. В цехе стоит полусобранный трактор для заказчика. Компания применяет ФСБУ 9/2025 и признала часть выручки, относящуюся к трактору. Что нужно сделать с затратами на его производство?
Оставить в себестоимости незавершенного производства31%
Перевести в состав себестоимости готовой продукции31%
Списать в расходы отчетного периода31%
Списать в расходы будущих периодов8%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Понедельничный #опрос. Сегодня в формате бухгалтерской викторины. Что означает отсутствие раздела «Изменение учетной политики» в новом ФСБУ 10/2026 «Расходы»?
Стандарт применяется ретроспективно, кроме особых случаев12%
Стандарт применяется перспективно, кроме особых случаев15%
Организация может выбрать между ретроспективным и перспективным применением, кроме особых случаев21%
Организация должна выбрать тот же способ, который выбрала для перехода на ФСБУ 9/2025 «Доходы»52%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Понедельничный #опрос. Сегодня в формате бухгалтерской викторины. Куда в бухучете следует отнести себестоимость неисправимого брака?
На расходы периода30%
На незавершенное производство3%
На себестоимость выпуска20%
В зависимости от учетной политики допустим любой из приведенных вариантов47%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Типичный Бухгалтер @typical_buh · 19,873 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 29 September 2026
Налоги, законы и бизнес. Марат Самитов @oooavirta · 55,936 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Светлана Беляева | АФиНА @taxrisk · 25,262 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 September 2026
Контур для бухгалтера @externjournal · 42,925 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Бухучет, налоги, 1С @buhru · 35,222 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
Мы́тарь @mytar_rf · 27,370 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
Канал "Учёт без забот" @uchetbezzabot_1c · 39,381 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
1С Hacks | Бухгалтерия и Учёт @secrets_1C · 46,359 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
Бухэксперт @buhexpert8 · 75,314 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
Журнал "Главбух" @eglavbukru · 82,400 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Excel Hacks | Бухгалтерия и Аналитика @hacks_excel · 283,237 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Бухучет и налоги от «Клерк.Ру» @klerkonline · 20,478 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 September 2026
Нетипичный бухгалтер 🥇 @netipichniy_buh · 77,962 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
ФНС России @nalog_gov_ru · 89,483 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026
1С для бухгалтера ❤️ @buhi1c · 37,820 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
Журнал "Упрощёнка" @uproshchenka · 22,735 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
Система Главбух @sistemaglavbukh · 25,689 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 September 2026
Финансовый анализ @fin_analytics · 41,574 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
ЛИЧНЫЕ НАЛОГИ @persontaxes · 31,374 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Системный и Бизнес-анализ @ba_sa_analytics · 52,520 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Бухгалтерский квартал @buhgalteriaLL · 22,255 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 September 2026
Excel Everyday @excel_everyday · 52,061 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Бухгалтерский юмор 🤪 @buhast · 31,063 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
Управление персоналом | hr, карьера, кадры @secrets_hr · 21,873 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Переводчик с бухгалтерского” (@accwhisper), 50,511 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/accwhisper.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.