Конструктор запросов в 1С 8.3 (часть 2) Продолжение обзора инструмента 1С "Конструктор запросов": как изменить порядок полей в запросе, выбор первых записей, создание временных таблиц, пакеты запросов, вложенные запросы, ИТОГИ.. Смотреть это видео на youtube: youtu.be/q5jmxKCaFoA

Channel
1С Hacks | Бухгалтерия и Учёт
@secrets_1C
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
46,113subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001732716333 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @secrets_1C |
| Description | Научим тебя эффективной работе в 1C. Сотрудничество: @max_excel MAX: max.ru/secrets_1C РКН: vk.cc/cHiCJm |
| Created | 12 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/secrets_1C |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:59 | 46,113 | -61 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 46,174 | -24 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 05:53 | 46,198 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:04 | 46,216 | -27 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:15 | 46,243 | -40 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 46,283 | -32 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 46,315 | -26 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 46,341 | -34 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 46,375 | -23 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 46,398 | -51 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:49 | 46,449 | +457 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 45,992 | +71 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 45,921 | +28 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 45,893 | -14 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 45,907 | -25 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 45,932 | -26 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 45,958 | -19 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 45,977 | -17 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 45,994 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 45,996 | first reading |
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.46%
- avg views ÷ 46,113 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,980
- 55 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 55
- of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 75 (12 July 2026 – 8 September 2026) |
| Views total | 163,740 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 00:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 20
- Videos
- 191
- Links
- 251
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 16h 30m
- Average length
- 22m 31s
Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 4.00%
- 3 of 75 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 3
- posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 2,910
- over 3 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 3,120
- over 72 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqvJnhvB | 1 | 27 August 2026 | 27 August 2026 |
| 2VtzqvMP4jd | 1 | 6 August 2026 | 6 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFH1n9J1 | 1 | 19 August 2026 | 19 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 8 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Posted without readable text
Добавление товара в 1С:Розница (создание номенклатуры) В данном видео автор объясняет, как правильно товар добавляется в программу 1С:Розница, как задавать цену этому товару, назначать закупочную и розничную цены, назначать категорию товара, добавлять штрих-код и многое другое.. 1С Hacks
Posted without readable text
Конструктор запросов 1С 8.3 (часть 1) Встроенный помощник в составлении запросов в 1С — конструктор запросов. Работа с виртуальными таблицами, параметрами, группировками, соединение, объединение, упорядочивание.. Смотреть это видео на youtube: youtu.be/Awvv-cJ7sdg
Posted without readable text
Как удалить дубли в номенклатуре в 1С Допустим, у вас есть две номенклатуры, которые относятся к одному и тому же товару. Как удалить их из 1С, чтобы не было повторений? Смотрите короткий видеоурок с лайфхаком по 1С.. Смотреть это видео на youtube: youtu.be/kXaoaKuvAco
Как успешно сменить работу? Узнаешь в этом канале. 📌 Канал @secrets_hr делится полезными секретами и лайфхаками в составлении резюме, трудоустройстве и управлении персоналом для HR. Подписывайтесь и прокачивайте свои навыки: @secrets_hr
ТОП 5 ошибок при выборе 1С Предприятие В этом видео автор разбирает наиболее распространенные ошибки и заблуждения при выборе, какую 1С выбрать и купить. 1С Hacks
Встраиваем 1С в свой сайт В этом видео автор разбирает новый механизм встраивания веб-клиента 1С в архитектуру существующего сайта. Расширьте возможности сайта с помощью платформы 1С:Предприятие 8.. Смотреть это видео на youtube: youtu.be/c-NnxV6-qbc
8 сентября вместе со Сбером проводим конференцию «Бухгалтерский бизнес 2026» — встречу для собственников и руководителей бухгалтерских компаний, которые хотят развивать бизнес системно и расти в новых условиях. Соберём в одном месте предпринимателей и экспертов отрасли, чтобы поговорить о том, что действительно волнует бухгалтерский бизнес сегодня: как находить клиентов, выстраивать продажи и маркетинг, не конкуриро…
📌 5 секретных приемов в 1С для бухгалтера и аналитика В этом вебинаре автор разбирает: • групповое изменение реквизитов в документах • загрузку номенклатуры списком из excel-файла • настройку интерфейса 1С под себя • поиск нужных документов и отчетов за пару секунд • удобное сравнение отчетов и файлов в 1С.. Смотреть это видео на youtube: youtube.com/live/t6VG63dOQyQ
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @secrets_1C. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@secrets_1C edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 19 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 7 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ai_finansist · 14,6291 postimplecs | ИТ-компания | 1C, Битрикс
@implecs_it · 6231 postУправление проектами и продуктами в IT | Project & Product Management
@product_and_project · 16,7961 postStudent invest
@studentinvest · 21 postСекреты сисадмина | DevOps, Linux, SRE
@sysadmin_library · 25,3691 postПереход Что за инвестор
@WhatTheInvestor · 2231 postЯхонтова про финансы и удаленку
@yahontova_profinance · 6,1011 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hacks_excel · 284,286#1
@fin_analytics · 41,310#2
@analytics_secrets · 46,841#3
@ba_sa_analytics · 51,879#4
@databases_secrets · 30,018#5
@python_secrets · 40,692#6
@secrets_hr · 22,081#7
@sysadmin_library · 25,369#8
@gulchikk · 8,027#9
@buxonlinetrening · 2,258 (as read 27 August 2026)#10
@product_and_project · 16,796#11
@normauz · 12,788#12
@odin1C_rus · 7,804#13
@google_sheets · 60,646#14
@ISB_uz · 1,201#15
@accwhisper · 50,806#16
@excelhackru · 73,670#17
@balansvplus · 1,560#18
@NAAAUZ · 1,652 (as read 27 August 2026)#19
@bssuz · 11,239#20
@buhru · 35,395#21
@devops_sc · 14,882#22
@admguides · 11,886#23
@ctrl_Excel · 2,066#24
@onecv8 · 12,481#25
@small_biz · 10,215#26
@glavbuh_uz · 835#27
@lite1C · 11,383#28
@yellowclub_official · 11,295#29
@ML_secrets · 7,423#30
@znak1c · 4,418#31
@iqp_uz · 1,586#32
@lemur_excel · 49,881#33
@buhast · 31,153#34
@by_1cnik · 6,200#35
@lifehackoftheday · 25,724#36
@buhexpert8 · 75,881#37
@company1c · 6,439#38
@blogpro1c · 7,286#39
@quazareline · 3,239#40
@free_edu · 310,569#41
@osint_pythons · 36,563#42
@knijnoe_xranilishe · 19,688#43
@bzd_channel · 36,431#44
@uc_1c · 6,767#45
@razrab1c · 11,834#46
@lector_1c · 12,306#47
@porscode_tg · 28,501#48
@code_library · 17,373#49
@netipichniy_buh · 78,564#50
@excel_everyday · 52,417#51
@giga_1c · 681#52
@IvanProg1SS · 10,078#53
@Programming1CNizamutdinov · 6,361#54
@IT_Portal · 100,558#55
@buhi1c · 38,005#56
@uzmdk · 200,524#57
@bhblaw · 31,661#58
@buh_uz · 18,322#59
@pravoinf · 32,977#60
@tavat_consulting · 3,386#61
@potrebitel_uz · 38,601#62
@tashkent_segodnya · 61,296#63
@bugfeature · 581,205#64
@sysodmins_league · 13,108#65
@electex_ifrs · 2,898#66
@academyofaccountants · 1,153#67
@pcTeapot · 39,544#68
@Social_engineering · 125,064#69
@tax_uzb · 8,929#70
@buhgalteria_uz_vakansii · 4,365#71
@CScience1 · 7,816#72
@centralbankuzbekistan · 44,253#73
@finrep_uz · 879#74
@networkadm · 12,415#75
@ERP_1C_official · 6,738#76
@docbhb · 5,795#77
@locasuz · 69,515#78
@Uzbeklanguageonline · 9,452#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@fin_analytics · 41,310
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
@ba_sa_analytics · 51,879
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@analytics_secrets · 46,841
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
@databases_secrets · 30,018
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
@excelhackru · 73,670
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
@python_secrets · 40,692
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
@lemur_excel · 49,881
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
@excel_everyday · 52,417
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
@google_sheets · 60,646
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
@accwhisper · 50,806
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026
@buhru · 35,395
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
@buhexpert8 · 75,881
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
@buhi1c · 38,005
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
@uchetbezzabot_1c · 39,758
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“1С Hacks | Бухгалтерия и Учёт” (@secrets_1C), 46,113 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/secrets_1C.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.