Crypto is moving again. Your internet was already working. Put it to work. Keep UpRock running on mobile or desktop → contribute to a global network → earn UPT. Then stack more on top: → Play games → Answer surveys → Scan receipts → Invite friends → Stake what you earn And while you’re living your life, put Rocket to work too. Research something. Watch a price. Find a deal. Monitor what matters. Contribute. Ea…

Channel
UpRock | Announcements
@uprockcom
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
120,343subscribers
-1,890 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001537321053 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @uprockcom |
| Description | UpRock | Announcements |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/uprockcom |
Topic
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:09 | 120,343 | -185 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 120,528 | -116 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 120,644 | -117 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 120,761 | -155 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 120,916 | -112 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 121,028 | -170 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 121,198 | -138 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 121,336 | -170 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 121,506 | -122 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 121,628 | -166 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 121,794 | -110 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 121,904 | -106 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 122,010 | -141 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 122,151 | -82 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 122,233 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:09 | 122,233 | first reading |
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.927%
- avg views ÷ 120,343 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,120
- 24 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.871%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 24
- of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (15 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26,774 |
| Reactions total | 232 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈414
- Videos
- ≈235
- Links
- ≈1,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 6m 11s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
358 reactions across 32 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 188 | 52.5% | |
| 🔥 | 67 | 18.7% | |
| 👍 | 52 | 14.5% | |
| 🤔 | 13 | 3.63% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 3.07% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 2.51% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 1.68% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.12% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 0.838% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 0.559% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.279% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.279% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.279% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 358reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Weekly Call #115 London. Proactive agents. The Web3 pulse. New community builds. And a couple of special guests joining us live. Today we’re covering: → Rocket Around the World — Stop #3: London 32 boroughs. Endless discoveries. See what Rocket is finding across the city. → The Proactive Agent Why the small recurring loops are exactly where Rocket starts earning your trust. → The Web3 Pulse What people are feeli…
❤3
The AI Watching Series Episode 8: Sports Search the game. Skip the replay. Rocket watches sports videos. To save you time. Looking for the moment that mattered? Don’t spend hours jumping between highlights, interviews, press conferences, tactical breakdowns, podcasts, and analysis trying to find it. Let Rocket do the searching first. Ask questions like: → Show every goal from last night’s match. → Find what the …
❤5🤯1
The Proactive Agent See the full post: https://x.com/UpRockCom/status/2089766151714689291
🔥3
Rocket Around the World Stop #3: London One city. 32 boroughs. Endless discoveries. This week, Rocket is exploring London through live web intelligence, local videos, and recommendations from the UpRock community. But London has layers. So we need the people who actually know it. What should Rocket discover? → Best pub that isn't a tourist trap → Most underrated neighborhood → Best skyline view → Best place to wor…
❤8🤔3💯1
STACK THE BULL The vibes are coming back. Communities waking up. Memes moving. The bull is gaining. So let’s experiment. UpRock wants to put community tokens into the hands of mainstream users who are actively looking to earn. 50% of our users are new to crypto. And instead of asking people to buy another token, we want to explore something different: Play. Shop. Earn. Stack. Do the things you already do on your…
🔥8💯3❤2
Whitepaper IQ × UpRock: From Due Diligence to Continuous Due Diligence. A whitepaper tells you what a project promises. On-chain data tells you what happened. But reality doesn't stop there. Today, we're announcing a collaboration between Whitepaper IQ and UpRock to explore a new layer of continuous, evidence-backed intelligence for digital assets. See the full announcement: https://x.com/UpRockCom/status/20878868…
❤6❤🔥1😁1
STACK THE BULL. Something new is entering the UpRock universe. We’ll give you the first look today on Weekly Call #114. And yeah... this one could get interesting. Full Post: https://x.com/UpRockCom/status/2087830856765223017 Positive vibes. Active communities. Let’s have some fun.
❤7👀1
Most AI agents answer to a business model. Rocket answers to you. Rocket is built differently. Proactive. It doesn’t wait for the perfect prompt. Give Rocket a mission once, and it keeps working — researching, monitoring, checking, and coming back when something needs your attention. Cross-ecosystem. Rocket isn’t tied to one model, one device, or one closed stack. Android or iPhone. Different models. Different ser…
❤10🤯1
The AI Watching Series Episode 7: Crypto Stop refreshing. Let Rocket watch. Rocket watches crypto. To save you time. Waiting for a token launch? Don't spend hours refreshing X, Telegram, project pages, and announcements trying to catch the exact update you're waiting for. Give Rocket the mission instead. Ask things like: → Monitor this project and alert me when they post the contract address. → Let me know when th…
❤6🤔1😁1
Your Computer Can Earn Too. Your computer spends hours every day connected to the internet. Even when you're not using it. UpRock puts that time to work. Keep the desktop app running and your computer can contribute available resources to the UpRock network — and earn UPT while it does. No extra hardware. No complicated setup. Just the computer you already use. macOS Windows Linux You use it. UpRock uses the idl…
🔥5❤1
Rocket Around the World Stop #2: New York One city. Five boroughs. Infinite rabbit holes. This week, Rocket is exploring New York through live web intelligence, local videos, and recommendations from the UpRock community. But New York moves fast. So we need the people who actually know it. What should Rocket discover? → Best pizza that isn't a tourist trap → Most underrated neighborhood → Best skyline view → Best…
❤8🔥2🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @uprockcom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,057,014 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@theyescoin · 6,098,867#1
@catapult_extreme · 9,071,537#2
@Cats_housewtf · 8,508,014#3
@dotcoincommunity · 4,180,357#4
@TimeFarmChannel · 5,633,679#5
@fx_holding_community · 6,450,830#6
@gameechannel · 1,975,990#7
@boomloudcoin · 1,736,976#8
@pocketfi · 1,880,694#9
@hexnio · 2,090,103#10
@therealyescoin · 2,181,499#11
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,621,701#12
@cultofnot · 1,056,803#13
@smpl_app · 1,696,186#14
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,295,786#15
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,284,531#16
@theTapCoins · 3,077,818#17
@WagmiHub_News · 1,121,160#18
@catgoldminerann · 949,033#19
@iceblockchain · 1,310,269#20
@binance_announcements · 3,599,520#21
@boopupdates · 1,368,425#22
@MarinaProtocol_Announcement · 128,612#23
@metazoneofficial · 586,800#24
@icebergen · 1,637,772#25
@fintopionews · 2,413,665#26
@Birds_announcement · 1,615,533#27
@dogs · 7,412,338#28
@blumcrypto · 15,375,996#29
@hamster_kombat · 21,799,908#30
@notcoin · 9,113,759#31
@hotonnear · 4,880,449#32
@catizenann · 3,754,651#33
@seedupdates · 8,727,992#34
@tomarket_ai · 7,100,000#35
@the_vertus · 2,234,367#36
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 4,219,744#37
@banana_update · 1,459,534#38
@gram · 6,953,320#39
@pigscrew · 2,241,363#40
@watbird · 1,540,660#41
@realgoats_channel · 4,971,881#42
@AtheneNetwork_Ann · 754,432#43
@tapswapai · 10,785,090#44
@nomis_protocol · 1,612,474#45
@OGC_Announcements_Hub · 480,170#46
@trendingapps · 3,965,629#47
@tonstationgames · 3,355,759#48
@pixelverse_xyz · 3,258,716#49
@token_1win · 3,124,840#50
@celiaexchange · 255,381#51
@coincoinai · 1,874,326#52
@monorixofficial · 1,398,546#53
@builders · 3,553,061#54
@tabi_ann · 2,057,819#55
@onus_globalchannel · 1,730,589#56
@avagoldcoin · 1,844,079#57
@aquaprotocolxyzchannelen · 798,948#58
@rockyrabbitio · 3,654,878#59
@matchain_fam · 2,047,492#60
@polyrangercom · 1,864,316#61
@iamalexfalcon · 3,273,818#62
@gemswall · 1,474,812#63
@cryptoranknews · 710,037#64
@wave_announcements · 767,558#65
@drops_on_hot · 899,601#66
@tonkeeper_news · 5,027,403#67
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,814,337#68
@babydogecoin · 1,063,599#69
@corn_battles · 1,086,429#70
@CloutCoinSol · 1,000,725#71
@Monkey_on_TON · 857,489#72
@diamoremarket · 345,665#73
@herewallet · 1,166,271#74
@ONE_Quest_sub · 3,210,953#75
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,196,420#76
@deckforge_official · 2,174,355#77
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,135,809#78
@theYescoin_News · 340,713#79
@w3bflix · 757,372#80
@money · 3,205,118#81
@Mozo_News · 457,429#82
@num1_ch · 414,246#83
@autoruss · 870,863#84
@byin_fun · 572,970#85
@theFreeDogs_ANN · 1,760,517#86
@cryptowallet_news_en · 3,637,040#87
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,314,133#88
@mediarussia · 1,539,774#89
@TaskNChannel · 958,356#90
@hayzonn · 3,002,294#91
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MarinaProtocol_Announcement · 128,612
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@AZCoinerChannel · 217,981
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UpRock | Announcements” (@uprockcom), 120,343 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uprockcom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.