Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Усоварядом

Channel

Усоварядом

@usovapsy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,711subscribers

-84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001780355494
TypeChannel
Username@usovapsy
DescriptionПравославный психолог Наталья Усова Клинический психолог, педагог - психолог, арт-терапевт. Запись на консультацию ⬇️ https://psy-course.com/zapisatsya-na-konsultatsiyu/ Вебинары ⬇️ https://psy-course.com/webinar/ По вопросам сотрудничества @psyholog35
Created26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/usovapsy

Topic

Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,7027,7957,748.57 August 2026 — 7,795 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,795 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,793 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,781 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,774 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,773 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,763 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,768 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,766 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,778 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,783 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,763 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,766 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,767 subscribers26 September 2026 — 7,758 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,747 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,745 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,732 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,726 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,725 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,717 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,714 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,708 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,702 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,711 subscribers7,7117 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 89 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,688–7,809 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 10:407,711+9
1 Nov 2026, 06:097,702-6
29 Oct 2026, 16:507,708-6
27 Oct 2026, 02:197,714-3
23 Oct 2026, 20:217,717-8
21 Oct 2026, 05:377,725-1
18 Oct 2026, 09:167,726-6
15 Oct 2026, 06:007,732-13
11 Oct 2026, 23:577,745-2
5 Oct 2026, 07:597,747-11
26 Sept 2026, 21:397,758-9
18 Sept 2026, 01:027,767+1
13 Sept 2026, 20:187,766+3
9 Sept 2026, 23:397,763-20
4 Sept 2026, 23:407,783+5
29 Aug 2026, 07:387,778+12
26 Aug 2026, 04:467,766-2
23 Aug 2026, 08:547,768+5
19 Aug 2026, 12:027,763-10
16 Aug 2026, 17:387,773first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.78%
avg views ÷ 7,711 subscribers
Avg views / post
368
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held52 (31 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total4,419
Reactions total235
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 23:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,780
Videos
≈1,090
Links
≈1,330

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11m 04s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,563 reactions across 51 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,07468.7%
🔥22114.1%
👍1056.72%
😁986.27%
🎉271.73%
🥰181.15%
👏90.576%
🤔80.512%
🤩30.192%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,563 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 18:20 UTC334 views44 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

УЖИН С АНГЕЛОМ. История о любви ❤️ Одним из самых сильных впечатлений от нашей поездки в Петербург стало посещение музея современного искусства «Эрарта». Признаюсь, не ожидала, что современное искусство окажется настолько понятным, живым и близким. Здесь хочется не просто рассматривать картины, а останавливаться, размышлять, чувствовать. И некоторые работы потом ещё долго не отпускают. Особенно меня тронула картин…

❤44

2 Nov 2026, 16:28 UTC370 views8 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

«Я плохой отец»: что делать с этим чувством. 1⃣ Не спрашивайте себя: «Какой я отец?» — спросите: «Что именно я сделал?» Фраза «я плохой отец» слишком глобальна и быстро уводит в стыд. Гораздо полезнее конкретизировать: я накричал, был слишком жёстким, не выполнил обещание, мало участвовал, не заметил, что ребёнку было трудно. Конкретный поступок можно исправлять, идентичность «плохого отца» — только переживать. 2⃣О…

👍8

2 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC309 views13 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @family_advicePhoto

Как мы незаметно становимся для любимого человека мамой, папой или спасателем? 2️⃣3️⃣ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤, 19:00 Встречаемся с Натальей Усовой @usovapsy — православным психологом и автором журнала «Фома». Наталья замужем больше 25 лет, у неё трое сыновей. Тема встречи: «Два взрослых человека: как строить отношения без спасательства и перевоспитания» В своём канале Наталья пишет, что иногда мы выбираем того, «кого нужно понима…

❤11👍2

2 Nov 2026, 13:01 UTC310 views8 reactionsread 4 November 2026

🕊️Друзья! Буду в Москве. Всех жду!

❤6🎉1👍1

1 Nov 2026, 13:24 UTC403 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Хочу на тренинг. Но немного страшно Бывает так, что тема очень откликается. Узнаёшь себя в примерах, понимаешь, что хочется научиться по-другому разговаривать. Но записаться всё равно непросто. 😔Что за люди будут в группе? Получится ли выполнять упражнения? А если растеряюсь и не найду слов? На тренинг можно прийти именно с этими трудностями. Не нужно заранее уметь спокойно отвечать на критику, уверенно отказывать…

❤5

31 Oct 2026, 19:37 UTC466 views25 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Отцовская вина. Мы много говорим о мамах: о материнской тревоге, выгорании, чувстве вины. А сегодня мне хочется поговорить об отцах. Отцовская вина тоже существует, просто нередко выглядит иначе. ✔️Очень часто внутренний вопрос мужчины звучит так: «Я достаточно сделал?» Обеспечить? Помочь? Справиться? Был ли тем, на кого можно опереться? Поэтому одна из болезненных тем отцовской вины — бессилие. Ребёнок плачет, …

❤17🔥4🤔4

30 Oct 2026, 08:37 UTC478 views34 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Наше первое знакомство с оперой ❤️ В этот приезд в Петербург мы решили познакомить Вову с новым для него видом музыкального искусства — оперой. До этого мы уже были в Мариинском театре, смотрели балет. А теперь захотелось чего-то другого. Выбрали оперу Чайковского «Черевички» в театре «Санктъ-Петербургъ Опера». И какое же это было замечательное решение! Признаюсь, я даже не предполагала, что опера может настолько…

❤17👍17

29 Oct 2026, 09:17 UTC399 views7 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

➡️«Я говорю о своих чувствах, а он слышит обвинение. Что делать?» После эфира пришёл вопрос: «Если говоришь человеку, что тебе не подходит или неприятно, а он воспринимает это как нападение или обвиняет в эгоизме: "Ты только о себе говоришь", — какие пути выхода могут быть? Понятно желание найти такие слова, чтобы другой наконец услышал. Особенно когда Вы уже стараетесь говорить спокойно и от своего имени. Но «я-…

❤3👍3🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @usovapsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

Умеете ли вы договариваться? Договориться — это не значит уступить. И не значит убедить другого сделать по-вашему. Это способность найти решение, в котором услышаны оба человека.

  1. ✔️Если наши желания не совпадают, я могу спокойно сказать, чего хочу, и выслушать его(её) позицию.65%
  2. ✔️Если супруг(а) предлагает то, что мне не нравится, я сначала пойму, почему это важно для него(неё)38%
  3. ✔️ Во время спора я могу изменить своё мнение, если понимаю, что аргументы другого человека разумны76%
  4. ✔️Если не приходим к общему решению,можем не продолжать разговор. Я предложу вернуться к нему позже29%
  5. ✔️Я могу согласиться на компромисс, даже если в результате получу не всё, чего хотела(ел).65%
  6. ✔️Если мне пришлось уступить, я не припоминаю это супругу(е) при следующем конфликте.41%
  7. ✔️Я могу прямо сказать: «Мне это не подходит. Давай подумаем, какой ещё вариант устроит нас обоих»59%
  8. ✔️Если вопрос для супруга(и)значительно важнее,чем для меня, буду это учитывать при принятии решения62%
  9. ✔️Мы договорились, но я понимаю, что мне не подходит решение, я снова подниму вопрос56%
  10. ✔️После сложного разговора не ищу виноватого, а стараюсь понять, есть ли решение для двоих41%

The shares total 532%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Православный психолог | Никита Сергеевич Яночкин
@yanochkin_psiholog · 17,111
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
Священник Никита Горбик
@otec_nikita · 24,591
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 September 2026
Молитва о семье
@molitva_o_semje · 22,297
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
Мотивации от Берегового 🎯
@beregovoymotimotivation · 21,497
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 September 2026
Алина Бабкина
@alinababkinatg · 22,523
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
Священник Владислав Береговой
@pravoslavieVtelege · 97,535
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
🍏ПРОСТО.ПОСТНО🍏 постные рецепты
@prostopostno_natalia · 53,080
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
Господи Иисусе Христе, Сыне Божий, помилуй мя...
@ICXC_pravoslavie · 19,566
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 September 2026
Виктория Макарская. Бабсовет
@makarskayababsovet · 228,378
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Матушка Екатерина Муравьева | православие, Петербург, рецепты
@katherinemuraveva · 18,805
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 October 2026
Что-то личное
@chto_to_li4noe · 27,498
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
Николай Бабкин | cвященник, клинический психолог
@nickolaybabkin · 57,459
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
Игумен Нектарий (Морозов)
@igumennektariy · 25,769
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
СВЯЩЕННИК НИКОЛАЙ ДУБИНИН. Белгородская Митрополия.
@otecnikolay_d · 43,561
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Православие и дети
@pravoslavie_i_deti · 56,723
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
Православная психология
@orthodoxpsiholog · 73,390
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
ПП - Православное Питание
@pravrecept · 23,192
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
Otche.pro
@otchepro0 · 21,765
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
oliv'едка | дом·уют·рецепты 🤍
@olivedka · 28,259
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 September 2026
ДОБРОДЕТЕЛЬНАЯ ЖЕНА
@dobrodetelnaya_zhena · 23,064
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
SALOMEYA
@ElenaSalomeya · 19,313
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 October 2026
Канал о. Саввы Мажуко
@savvamazhuko · 29,574
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
@tatiana_paris
@tatiana_paris · 22,444
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
Сергей Комаров
@komarov_mission · 19,488
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026

This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Усоварядом” (@usovapsy), 7,711 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usovapsy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.