Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Узбекский Ритейл

Channel

Узбекский Ритейл

@uzbekretail

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,069subscribers

+77 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001298015612
TypeChannel
Username@uzbekretail
Created1 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/uzbekretail

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 4 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@uzbekretail/18134 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC@uzbekfintech/41644 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC1.00under a minute
@uzbekfintech/41695 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC@uzbekretail/18141 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC1.00under a minute
@uzbekfintech/41736 Aug 2026, 05:27 UTC@uzbekretail/18149 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC1.005 minutes
@uzbekretail/18133 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC@uzbekfoodtech/17873 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC1.00under a minute
@uzbekfoodtech/17904 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC@uzbekretail/18137 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC1.0019 minutes
@uzbekfoodtech/17914 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC@uzbekretail/18140 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC1.002.9 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@uzbekfintech11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@uzbekfintech (83)
@uzbekfoodtech8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0011 minutes@uzbekfoodtech (53)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 37 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @uzbekfintech. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,9929,0699,030.56 August 2026 — 8,992 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,993 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,004 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,007 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,015 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,019 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,028 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,040 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,034 subscribers3 September 2026 — 9,046 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,051 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,052 subscribers17 September 2026 — 9,069 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net +77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,980–9,081 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 21:179,069+17
13 Sept 2026, 11:219,052+1
9 Sept 2026, 08:219,051+5
3 Sept 2026, 19:419,046+12
31 Aug 2026, 12:449,034-6
28 Aug 2026, 11:339,040+12
22 Aug 2026, 01:369,028+9
18 Aug 2026, 10:449,019+4
15 Aug 2026, 17:349,015+8
12 Aug 2026, 13:549,007+3
9 Aug 2026, 12:349,004+11
6 Aug 2026, 11:008,993+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:518,992first reading

Engagement

195 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.7%
avg views ÷ 9,069 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,240
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.188%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 195 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held195 (3 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total44,574
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 45s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

336 reactions across 91 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍20460.7%
👎13239.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 108 of the 195 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 423 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 195 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 195 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @uzbekretail. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 195 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC553 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @uzbekfintechPhoto

Tez QR теперь встроен в систему оплаты парковок Maydon UZCARD и группа компаний Maydon интегрировали Tez QR в парковочную систему. Теперь при выезде на экране автоматически появляется QR-код с точной суммой к оплате — сканируете его прямо из машины и оплачиваете любым удобным способом. Не нужно искать паркомат, доставать наличные или передавать карту сотруднику. Помимо парковок, Tez QR уже принимают более чем на 20

28 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC656 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🎉 Покупайте технику без первоначального взноса! В texnomart с 28 по 31 августа действует акция 0-0-6 на всю технику! Первоначальный взнос — 0% Переплата — 0% Рассрочка — 6 месяцев Узнайте больше на официальном сайте texnomart! 🚀 Спешите, количество техники ограничено! 📞71-209-99-44 Telegram / Facebook / Instagram / LinkedIn

28 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC809 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

В аэропорту Ташкента впервые появятся симкоматы Uzbekistan Airports выставила на электронной торговой площадке E-auksion коммерческий лот под установку симкоматов в Международном аэропорту Ташкента. На аукцион выставлены две площади по 1 кв.м в залах CIP и VIP. Они предназначены для установки терминалов самообслуживания, через которые пассажиры смогут самостоятельно приобретать физические SIM-карты международной мо

28 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC756 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @uzbekfintechPhoto

Банковские карты, терминалы и банкоматы в Узбекистане: рейтинг банков на 1 августа 2026 года Лидером по числу выпущенных банковских карт в Узбекистане на 1 августа 2026 года стал Народный банк — свыше 12,1 млн карт, что составляет более 16% от общего объема карт в обращении по стране (75,7 млн). Второе место занимает Uzum Bank (7,2 млн карт), третье — Агробанк (6,8 млн карт). Данные опубликованы Центральным банком У

28 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC≈1,130 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Как продать первую партию одежды за месяц и заработать +33%: кейс Uzum Market Екатерина Рашидова, владелица KATANA, запустила на Uzum Market женский костюм «3 в 1». Первую партию продали примерно за месяц, а чистая прибыль составила 33% от вложений. Средний чек — около 350 тыс. сумов, пиковая выручка одной карточки — до 5 млн сумов в день. Что сработало: — качественные фото и инфографика; — первые отзывы и бартер

👎4

28 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC≈2,840 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

В Узбекистане классифайд Listee заработал в тестовом режиме Первые пять тысяч пользователей пробуют сервис. Международная технологическая компания Listee начала тестирование собственной ресейл-платформы для сделок между частными лицами (C2C), выбрав Узбекистан одним из первых рынков запуска. Сервис уже имеет десктоп www.listee.uz и Android версию. Напомним, платформа объединяет объявления, инструменты выстраивани

👍2👎1

28 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Госдоля Fonon (Gold Moon Tashkent) выставлена на торги Агентство по управлению государственными активами выставило на открытые торги 100% государственную долю в компании Gold Moon Tashkent. Стартовая цена лота составляет 316,67 млрд сумов, аукцион состоится 28 сентября в 10:00. Об этом сообщается на E-auksion. Согласно данным Единого государственного регистра предприятий и организаций, Gold Moon Tashkent была учреж

28 Aug 2026, 03:56 UTC≈1,210 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Российская компания планирует локализовать производство экологически чистых продуктов в Узбекистане Генеральный консул Узбекистана в Новосибирске Аслам Акбаров встретился с генеральным директором ООО «Сибереко» Андреем Мандриком. Андрей Мандрик выразил готовность к долгосрочному сотрудничеству с узбекской стороной, в том числе по поставкам в республику экологически чистых продуктов питания, а в дальнейшем - локализ

👎1

27 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC≈1,500 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @uzbekCTMPhoto

Узбекистан увеличил экспорт лимонов в 2,2 раза Узбекистан в январе–июне 2026 года экспортировал за рубеж 4,1 тыс. тонн лимонов на сумму $4,2 млн. Объём поставок вырос в 2,2 раза по сравнению с аналогичным периодом прошлого года, сообщает Национальный комитет по статистике. Крупнейшим направлением экспорта стал Казахстан, куда за первые шесть месяцев года было поставлено 2,3 тыс. тонн лимонов. Россия заняла второе

👎1

27 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

DP World в октябре начнет строительство логотерминала в Ташкенте за $288 млн DP World (ОАЭ) в октябре 2026 года начнут строительство в Ташкенте логистического терминала, инвестиции в проект составят $288 млн, сообщил хоким города Шавкат Умурзаков. Объект будет рассчитан на обработку 120 млн тонн грузов и 150 тысяч контейнеров. Руководитель DP World передал президенту Узбекистану приглашение заложить первый камень

27 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC≈1,040 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @UzbBankingPhoto

В Узбекистане обороты по терминалам достигли 387 трлн сумов По состоянию на 1 августа 2026 года в обращении в Узбекистане находилось почти 75,7 миллиона банковских пластиковых карт, а через установленные в стране платежные терминалы за январь-июль 2026 года прошло 387,35 триллиона сумов. Об этом сообщает Центральный банк Республики Узбекистан. Согласно опубликованным данным, в стране установлено 453,5 тысячи платеж

👍1

27 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC≈1,270 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @uzbekCTMPhoto

Узбекистан экспортировал перец на $6,2 млн. Узбекистан в январе–июне 2026 года экспортировал 4,6 тыс. тонн перца в 18 стран на общую сумму $6,2 млн. Крупнейшими направлениями поставок стали Китай и Кыргызстан. Об этом сообщает Национальный комитет по статистике. В Китай за первые шесть месяцев года было поставлено 1,6 тыс. тонн узбекского перца. На втором месте по объему экспорта находится Кыргызская Республика, ку

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 195 posts we hold for @uzbekretail. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Spot.uz – бизнес и технологии
@spotuz · 26,833
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
Kapital.uz
@KPTLUZ · 22,326
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
Законы и постановления BHB
@bhblaw · 31,662
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 September 2026
Afisha.uz - Все события Ташкента
@afishauz · 32,854
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 September 2026
hh.uz – работа в Узбекистане
@headhunter_uz · 22,762
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 20 September 2026
The Tech
@thetechkz · 27,026
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
UzNews.uz
@uznews · 70,784
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
Gazeta.uz - Новости Узбекистана
@gazetauz · 86,091
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
payme
@payme_uz · 59,182
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
Alisher Isaev blogi
@AlisherIsaev_blogi · 42,346
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
Savdo-sanoat palatasi
@uzchamber · 25,738
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 September 2026
Системный и Бизнес-анализ
@ba_sa_analytics · 51,700
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Эффект Макаренко
@makarenko_channel · 36,030
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 September 2026
Секреты аналитики | Data Science, BI, Tableau
@analytics_secrets · 47,005
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
GULISTONLIKLAR 🇺🇿|Расмий канал
@Gulistonliklarl · 37,791
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 August 2026
Excel Everyday
@excel_everyday · 52,365
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
ЭКСЕЛЬХАК
@excelhackru · 73,606
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Creative Asia
@we_project · 72,367
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Околоритейл
@okoloretail · 36,851
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
По ходу разберёмся
@pohodu_media · 28,230
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 9 September 2026
Финансовый анализ
@fin_analytics · 41,153
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Узбекский Ритейл” (@uzbekretail), 9,069 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uzbekretail.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.