File, posted without a caption

Channel
H Na
@vadafuckkk
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
-8,708 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001900312693 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vadafuckkk |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 December 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vadafuckkk |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:16 | 2 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:07 | 3 | +1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 2 | -9,302 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 19:56 | 9,304 | +8 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 23:18 | 9,296 | +139 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 9,157 | +98 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 9,059 | -16 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 9,075 | +7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 9,068 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 9,070 | +53 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 9,017 | +91 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 8,926 | +114 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 8,812 | +62 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:27 | 8,750 | +34 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 8,716 | +80 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 8,636 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 8,644 | -28 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 8,672 | -37 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 8,709 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 8,710 | first reading |
Engagement
97 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 97 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 27s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,061 reactions across 43 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 441 | 21.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 296 | 14.4% | |
| 💘 | 294 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 186 | 9.02% | |
| 🍓 | 168 | 8.15% | |
| 🔥 | 161 | 7.81% | |
| 🤝 | 156 | 7.57% | |
| 👀 | 137 | 6.65% | |
| 💋 | 129 | 6.26% | |
| 🤓 | 44 | 2.13% | |
| 💅 | 31 | 1.50% | |
| 🤷♀ | 18 | 0.873% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 97 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,061 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 97 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
File, posted without a caption
Umm I liked
به ازای هرباری که قلبم شکست،کسکشتر شدم.
Video message, posted without a caption
تمامی محصولات آرایشی و بهداشتی با بالاترین کیفیت و اقتصادی ترین قیمت🤓🎀 مسترکوالیتی و اورجینال با پایین ترین قیمت ممکن✨💓 باورت میشه🤭 @stuffwithkk @stuffwithkk @stuffwithkk
شاید بدترین چیزی که مجبور به تجربه کردنش شدم،هدر رفتن بهترین ورژنم برای بدترین آدم ها بوده.
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
انقدر اذیتم نکن من هنوز شبا با عروسک میخوابم.
File, posted without a caption
دیگه مراعات هیشکیو تو زندگیم نمیکنم
Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @vadafuckkk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @vadafuckkk as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 20 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 24 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 21 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@vadafuckkk named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@For4ever · 28,141
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 9 September 2026
@Unsent_messagee · 22,562
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 September 2026
@Chanel_Whales · 67,955
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 29 August 2026
@aboutuschanel · 27,712
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 8 September 2026
@llbeelll · 29,516
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 September 2026
@lldalall · 22
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026
@urfavhelliya · 22,589
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“H Na” (@vadafuckkk), 2 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vadafuckkk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.