Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐄𝐋 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐋𝐄𝐒 🐋

Channel

𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐄𝐋 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐋𝐄𝐒 🐋

@Chanel_Whales

Not marked by Telegram, checked 14 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

101,969subscribers

+99,305 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002214478154
TypeChannel
Username@Chanel_Whales
Descriptionهدف اینجا ؟ جایی که آینده مالی ساخته میشه🚀🎯 سیگنال های ناب رایگان📈🥇 تحلیل های دقیق🔱 اینجا فقط رشد میکنیم🔝 🗽𝑶𝒘𝒏𝒆𝒓 : @DrDiaco 👤𝑨𝒅𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝟏 : @Matin_CRP 👤𝑨𝒅𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝟐 : @Benzzgang 🧠𝑰𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 : @burakm86
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held21
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Chanel_Whales

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,657101,96952,3137 August 2026 — 2,664 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,664 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,666 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,660 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,657 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,658 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,663 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,678 subscribers29 August 2026 — 61,881 subscribers30 August 2026 — 61,926 subscribers31 August 2026 — 100,934 subscribers1 September 2026 — 100,953 subscribers2 September 2026 — 101,211 subscribers3 September 2026 — 101,497 subscribers5 September 2026 — 101,539 subscribers8 September 2026 — 101,855 subscribers11 September 2026 — 101,946 subscribers13 September 2026 — 101,883 subscribers15 September 2026 — 101,947 subscribers17 September 2026 — 101,922 subscribers19 September 2026 — 101,969 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
21 measurements spanning 43 days, net +99,305. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 17:37101,969+47
17 Sept 2026, 05:02101,922-25
15 Sept 2026, 05:17101,947+64
13 Sept 2026, 12:01101,883-63
11 Sept 2026, 16:19101,946+91
8 Sept 2026, 23:18101,855+316
5 Sept 2026, 15:36101,539+42
3 Sept 2026, 15:42101,497+286
2 Sept 2026, 08:55101,211+258
1 Sept 2026, 11:38100,953+19
31 Aug 2026, 13:24100,934+39,008
30 Aug 2026, 13:3661,926+45
29 Aug 2026, 15:5761,881+59,203
27 Aug 2026, 00:542,678+15
23 Aug 2026, 23:142,663+5
17 Aug 2026, 11:272,658+1
14 Aug 2026, 02:052,657-3
11 Aug 2026, 03:512,660-6
8 Aug 2026, 02:572,666+2
7 Aug 2026, 13:332,664first reading

Engagement

138 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.481%
avg views ÷ 101,969 subscribers
Avg views / post
490
115 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
118
of 138 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 105 of 115 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held138 (5 August 202620 September 2026)
Views total56,351
Reactions total1,039
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Sept 2026, 23:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,220
Videos
93
Links
134

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 12s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,081 reactions across 118 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
46042.6%
❤‍🔥16515.3%
🔥12711.7%
👍11210.4%
🐳797.31%
😁494.53%
😢343.15%
🗿161.48%
💔121.11%
👏100.925%
👌50.463%
🕊40.37%
😭30.278%
💯20.185%
😱20.185%
🥰10.093%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,081 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,863
across the posts below
Posts paid on
41
of 135 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
811
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Chanel_Whales. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 138 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 17:27 UTC131 views5 reactionsread 21 September 2026

the comeback is coming🔼

3🕊2

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

15 Sept 2026, 23:42 UTC582 views7 reactionsread 21 September 2026

⚠️اگر آینده دلار برات مهم هستش زیاد نه فقط 3 4 دیقه زمان بزار و این رو بخون ⚠️

5😁2

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

15 Sept 2026, 23:41 UTC579 views12 reactionsread 21 September 2026

📌آقای زنجانی قصد داره ریال رو توکنیزه کنه یعنی مثل تتر بکنن. یعنی چی ⁉️ ❔میخوان طوری کنن که امکان معاملات شورت هم وجود داشته باشه. تو این حالت اگر شما بخوایید پیش بینی بکنید که مثلا قیمت امروز دلار 230 هزار تومن هست مثلا پیش بینی تو اینه که میتونه 200 هزار تومن هم میتونه بشه یعنی تو ، تو این حالت میتونی از قیمت 230 هزار تومن تا قیمت 200 هزار تومن میتونی پوزیشن شورت بگیری یعنی دلار رو بفروشی و از پایین رفتنش سود ب

❤‍🔥65👍1

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

15 Sept 2026, 23:03 UTC485 views11 reactionsread 21 September 2026

📌بابک زنجانی دو سه هفته قبل ( وقتی که قیمت دلار 210 هزار تومن بود ) گفت که اگه ما بخوایم اینو بیاریم بکنیمش 170 هزار تومن که همین امروز خیلی از مردم نابود میشن. 🔽اما وقتی این رو شورت پوزیشن هایی براش ایجاد کنی که فشار بزاره روی به پایین کشیدن و مردم رو مشارکت بدی توی اینجا یعنی از بالا به پایین هم که داره میاد داره سود میگیره اینو بچه های فارکسی ها کسایی که کارهای مالی میکنن میفهمن من چی بهشون میگم. 👆تا اینجا‌ صحبت

❤‍🔥53👍3

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

15 Sept 2026, 22:47 UTC436 views11 reactionsread 21 September 2026

یه صحبت دارم راجب قیمت دلار 🐝 بشدت مهم هستش❌

❤‍🔥8🔥21

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

15 Sept 2026, 22:02 UTC415 views7 reactionsread 21 September 2026

احتمال 75 درصد دامیننس تتر این هفته صعوی هستش ❌

5❤‍🔥2

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

15 Sept 2026, 19:06 UTC355 views4 reactionsread 21 September 2026

فردا شب مجدد وضعیت همینه😂

🐳4

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

15 Sept 2026, 18:56 UTC370 views3 reactionsread 21 September 2026

تصویب نشد🐝

🐳3

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

15 Sept 2026, 18:41 UTC370 views4 reactionsread 21 September 2026

تا هنوز مساوی ولی بازار دامپ کرد 🔽

4

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

15 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC355 views28 reactions102 Starsread 21 September 2026

ولی بنظرم نامردیه از تیممون تشکر نکنم اول از همه تو همینجا از ایهان برنامه نویس والز پرایس و واقعا یکی از ذات خوبا تیم تشکر میکنم بابت همه زحمتهایی که تا اینجا کشیده از علیرضا که تو هر دعوایی پشتمون بود از خانم عدلی بابت یک سال مدیریت گپ البته که الان نیست پیشمون ولی زحمتا زیادی کشیده و قابل احترامه تشکر ویژه از همشهریم بنیامین بابت تمام ایده های خفنش و وفاداری و کار درستیش میتونم بگم اگر هرچیز خفنی می‌بینید کار

15❤‍🔥7🔥6

Signed 𝐃𝐫 𝐃𝐈𝐀𝐂𝐎 ᴵ ᴺᵉᵛᵉʳ ᴰᴹ ʸᵒᵘ ᶠⁱʳˢᵗ

15 Sept 2026, 17:54 UTC299 views12 reactions100 Starsread 21 September 2026
Photo

امروز یکی از تارگت های امسالم خورد و به چیزی که میخواستم رسیدم تو این راهم سختی های زیادی کشیدم ولی اول خداروشکر بابت همه چی بعد دلم خواست تو همینجا از یک رفیق تشکر کنم که همه جوره تا الان به من کمک کرده و واقعا از اون رفیق های ذات پاکه که رفاقت باهاش انقدر ارزشمنده شاید خیلی ها ارزشو شو داشته باشن ولی خو خداروشکر بابتش سال قبل با تمام گند بودنش از حق نگذریم یکی از اتفاقات خوبش اشنایی با نیما بود برام مرسی رفیق با

8❤‍🔥2🐳2

Signed 𝐃𝐫 𝐃𝐈𝐀𝐂𝐎 ᴵ ᴺᵉᵛᵉʳ ᴰᴹ ʸᵒᵘ ᶠⁱʳˢᵗ

15 Sept 2026, 12:26 UTC307 views9 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

8👍1

Signed 𝐃𝐫 𝐃𝐈𝐀𝐂𝐎 ᴵ ᴺᵉᵛᵉʳ ᴰᴹ ʸᵒᵘ ᶠⁱʳˢᵗ

Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @Chanel_Whales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

𝐌𝐑|𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑 فارکس|کریپتو|ترید|سیگنال
@mrtrader210 · 251
#1
ارز دیجیتال
@wbsuz · 16,670
#2
حرکات_اصلاحی
@Cpiry · 9,889
#3
آرش مروتی فیزیک(تنها کانال اصلی استاد)
@morovati_fizik · 624
#4
Crypto《⁷》♡≠$
@bbxbdjdhdvjdjdh · 713
#5
Whale 52Hz Crypto
@Whale52HzCrypto · 2,100
#6
𝑺𝒖𝒑𝒆𝒓 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓 𝑮𝒂𝒎𝒆 | گیم | بازی | کالاف | کلش | وارکرفت|
@sstargme · 298
#7
𝗚𝗢𝗟𝗗 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗟𝗘
@GolDwHAle2024 · 18,198
#8
IRAN CRYPTO
@IRAN_CRYPTO_OFFICIALL · 6,131
#9
خاطراتم🤍
@naasolil · 163
#10
همستر/تپسواپ/تایم فارم/ماسک امپایر
@airdrop_bazz1 · 114
#11
🤍♡هرات من☽وتو☾♡🤍
@qanaweze · 293
#12
زروان | zorone
@zor_one · 775
#13
Cₕₐₙₙₑₗ Fₐₙₒₛ
@TOPPROFIL5566 · 436
#14
𝗤 𝗔𝗶𝗿𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗽
@Q_Airdrap2024 · 286
#15
𝐞𝐅𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐥
@efootball_2024_time · 33
#16
𝘿𝙖𝙧𝙠 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩
@Darrk_nightt · 199
#17
H Na
@vadafuckkk · 9,059
#18
👼𝑫𝒆𝒂𝒅 𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒆𝒍✨
@Angel_00666 · 1,427
#19
überdenken☼︎
@over403 · 249
#20
🧸♪·¯·♫¸¸ لبخند عشق ¸¸♫♥️
@Smileoflov04 · 1,317
#21
دَچار تو❤️‍🩹
@ROMANTIC136 · 1,294
#22
معلم القرآن
@alqoran1403 · 209
#23
𝘖𝘟𝘒.Ӡ❗🔇
@lKYNl_1X · 1,328 (as read 29 August 2026)
#24
ماهیتِ‌گمشده.
@deadam33 · 1,346
#25
Number1
@nomber1mz · 143 (as read 29 August 2026)
#26
⋆ִֶָ𓏲࣪ꪫ𝑁𝐴𝑅𝐶𝐼𝑆_𝐴𝑅𝑇ִֶָ🎪⛧
@narcisHonarmand · 15,037
#27
Blockchainyar
@blockchain_yar · 1,688
#28
𝙑𝙚𝙡𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙖𐙚
@afterlosinggg · 291 (as read 29 August 2026)
#29
Geraniums
@RadHabits · 3,498
#30
She
@lv2mohiw · 171
#31

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

QuickPing Vpn | فیلترشکن کوییک پینگ
@QuickPing · 155,894
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐄𝐋 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐋𝐄𝐒 🐋” (@Chanel_Whales), 101,969 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chanel_Whales.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.