Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐄𝐋 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐋𝐄𝐒 🐋

Channel

𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐄𝐋 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐋𝐄𝐒 🐋

@Chanel_Whales

Not marked by Telegram, checked 14 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

67,955subscribers

+65,291 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002214478154
TypeChannel
Username@Chanel_Whales
Descriptionهدف اینجا ؟ جایی که آینده مالی ساخته میشه🚀🎯 سیگنال های ناب رایگان📈🥇 تحلیل های دقیق🔱 اینجا فقط رشد میکنیم🔝 🗽𝑶𝒘𝒏𝒆𝒓 : @DrDiaco 👤𝑨𝒅𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝟏 : @Matin_CRP 👤𝑨𝒅𝒎𝒊𝒏 𝟐 : @Benzzgang 🧠𝑰𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 : @burakm86
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Chanel_Whales

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

2,657102,05052,353.57 August 2026 — 2,664 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,664 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,666 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,660 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,657 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,658 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,663 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,678 subscribers29 August 2026 — 61,881 subscribers30 August 2026 — 61,926 subscribers31 August 2026 — 100,934 subscribers1 September 2026 — 100,953 subscribers2 September 2026 — 101,211 subscribers3 September 2026 — 101,497 subscribers5 September 2026 — 101,539 subscribers8 September 2026 — 101,855 subscribers11 September 2026 — 101,946 subscribers13 September 2026 — 101,883 subscribers15 September 2026 — 101,947 subscribers17 September 2026 — 101,922 subscribers19 September 2026 — 101,969 subscribers26 September 2026 — 102,050 subscribers4 October 2026 — 91,866 subscribers9 October 2026 — 79,719 subscribers13 October 2026 — 67,719 subscribers14 October 2026 — 62,673 subscribers15 October 2026 — 61,562 subscribers16 October 2026 — 59,550 subscribers17 October 2026 — 67,131 subscribers18 October 2026 — 88,946 subscribers19 October 2026 — 88,473 subscribers20 October 2026 — 90,406 subscribers22 October 2026 — 88,573 subscribers23 October 2026 — 86,949 subscribers24 October 2026 — 85,473 subscribers25 October 2026 — 83,231 subscribers26 October 2026 — 81,847 subscribers26 October 2026 — 79,013 subscribers27 October 2026 — 77,749 subscribers28 October 2026 — 75,436 subscribers29 October 2026 — 73,928 subscribers30 October 2026 — 71,172 subscribers1 November 2026 — 69,827 subscribers1 November 2026 — 68,146 subscribers2 November 2026 — 67,980 subscribers3 November 2026 — 67,991 subscribers4 November 2026 — 67,970 subscribers5 November 2026 — 67,955 subscribers67,9557 August 20265 November 2026
48 measurements spanning 90 days, net +65,291. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 14:4667,955-15
4 Nov 2026, 18:0767,970-21
3 Nov 2026, 20:5067,991+11
2 Nov 2026, 21:2567,980-166
1 Nov 2026, 22:3868,146-1,681
1 Nov 2026, 00:3069,827-1,345
30 Oct 2026, 22:5871,172-2,756
29 Oct 2026, 23:2773,928-1,508
28 Oct 2026, 23:3075,436-2,313
27 Oct 2026, 20:2677,749-1,264
26 Oct 2026, 21:3979,013-2,834
26 Oct 2026, 00:5181,847-1,384
25 Oct 2026, 02:5083,231-2,242
24 Oct 2026, 04:4085,473-1,476
23 Oct 2026, 06:4086,949-1,624
22 Oct 2026, 07:5688,573-1,833
20 Oct 2026, 22:2890,406+1,933
19 Oct 2026, 23:4688,473-473
18 Oct 2026, 20:4088,946+21,815
17 Oct 2026, 19:4667,131first reading

Engagement

412 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 142 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.432%
avg views ÷ 67,955 subscribers
Avg views / post
294
231 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
231
of 412 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 187 of 231 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held412 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total67,809
Reactions total976
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 09:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,270
Videos
≈95
Links
≈145

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 16s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,178 reactions across 329 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤89841.2%
❤‍🔥34115.7%
👍27312.5%
🔥2169.92%
🐳1537.02%
😢713.26%
😁703.21%
🗿673.08%
💔381.74%
👏100.459%
🥰90.413%
👌80.367%
💯80.367%
🕊50.23%
😭50.23%
🤝30.138%
😱20.092%
🤩10.046%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 335 of the 412 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 412 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,715
across the posts below
Posts paid on
50
of 409 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
811
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Chanel_Whales. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 412 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 231 posts held from the last 30 days (3.46%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 19:57 UTC202 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

کسی نیس؟

❤9❤‍🔥1🔥1🥰1

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

5 Nov 2026, 17:40 UTC317 viewsread 6 November 2026

هر کی گیفت خوشگل داره برا بک‌گراند با قیمت مناسب خریدارم

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

5 Nov 2026, 17:28 UTC277 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

پشت این چارت خیلی حرفه #BTC

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

4 Nov 2026, 20:21 UTC572 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026

احساس میکنم چاقو رسیده به استخون

👍4

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

4 Nov 2026, 19:42 UTC544 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026

البته که این تحلیل ها بر اساس تکرار شدن گذشته چیده شده که یک قضیه هست تو انس جهانی طلا که گپ های مقاومتی بشدت زیادی روی اعداد 4700/4800 تشکیل داده که فکر میکنم تا دو سال اینده ما برای طلا رو انس جهانی صعودی نداشته باشیم طبق امواج الیوت برای موج های نزولی باید منتظر یک موج دیگه باشيم البته که این تحلیل منه و خب اینها فقط تحلیل هستند هیچ سیگنال خرید یا فروشی نیستش

👍1

Signed 𝐃𝐫 𝐃𝐈𝐀𝐂𝐎 ᴵ ᴺᵉᵛᵉʳ ᴰᴹ ʸᵒᵘ ᶠⁱʳˢᵗ

4 Nov 2026, 19:39 UTC533 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

چه بازی هایی شد

👍2

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

4 Nov 2026, 17:51 UTC544 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026

بریم با قیمت انس سال بعد حساب کنیم پیش بینی من برای قیمت انس حدود 5750 دلار هست تا آخر سال 2027 که با این قیمت انس میشه حدود 58 میلیون تومن یعنی حدود 125 درصد رشد خیلی عجیب اما واقعی

❤3👍2

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

4 Nov 2026, 17:46 UTC410 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026

یعنی اگر قیمت انس (4050 دلار) ثابت باشه تا سال بعد این موقع قیمت طلا با فرمول زیر بدست میاد : قیمت هر گرم طلای ۲۴ عیار: (قیمت انس جهانی × قیمت دلار) ÷ 31.1035 قیمت هر گرم طلای ۱۸ عیار: ((قیمت انس جهانی × قیمت دلار) ÷ 31.1035) × 0.75 که با این فرمول میشه قیمتی حدود 41 میلیون تومن میشه هر گرم طلای 18 عیار بدون سود و اجرت و مالیات و هیچی عجیبه نه ؟ حالا بیا قیمت انس سال بعد حساب کنیم

❤2👍1

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

4 Nov 2026, 17:43 UTC330 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026

از سال 1402 تا آذر ماه سال 1405 هر سال حدود 50 تا 60 درصد رشد داشته ما میگیریم 55% درصد که با دلار 272 هزار تومن میشه حدود 420 هزار تومن

❤2👍1

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

4 Nov 2026, 17:41 UTC325 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026

قیمت طلا 18 عیار الان درست 26 میلیون هست تحلیل و حرف من چیه ؟ یک : قیمت طلا چون با انس جهانیه اونم با دلار هست باید قیمت دلار سال بعد این موقع رو هم حساب کنی دومی رو بیا پست پایین👇

❤2👍1

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

4 Nov 2026, 17:39 UTC238 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤1👍1

Signed 𝔪𝔞𝔱𝔦𝔫

Showing the 12 most recent of 412 posts we hold for @Chanel_Whales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Chanel_Whales edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
6 October 2026
Most recent edit
6 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 9 posts on @Chanel_Whales as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
36 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
6

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTCAnonymous Poll39 voters

چیو تحلیل کنیم؟

  1. طلای داخلی51%
  2. BTC44%
  3. ETH31%
  4. و هر چیزی که شما بگین💸15%

The shares total 141%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Oct 2026, 19:12 UTCAnonymous Poll86 voters

برنده توپ طلا کی میشه؟

  1. لامین یامال🇪🇸24%
  2. امباپه🇫🇷47%
  3. هری کین🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿40%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 412 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

𝐌𝐑|𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐑 فارکس|کریپتو|ترید|سیگنال
@mrtrader210 · 249
#1
ارز دیجیتال
@wbsuz · 15,927
#2
حرکات_اصلاحی
@Cpiry · 9,577
#3
آرش مروتی فیزیک(تنها کانال اصلی استاد)
@morovati_fizik · 618
#4
Crypto《⁷》♡≠$
@bbxbdjdhdvjdjdh · 695
#5
Whale 52Hz Crypto
@Whale52HzCrypto · 2,060
#6
𝑺𝒖𝒑𝒆𝒓 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒓 𝑮𝒂𝒎𝒆 | گیم | بازی | کالاف | کلش | وارکرفت|
@sstargme · 288
#7
𝗚𝗢𝗟𝗗 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗟𝗘
@GolDwHAle2024 · 17,023
#8
IRAN CRYPTO
@IRAN_CRYPTO_OFFICIALL · 5,895
#9
خاطراتم🤍
@naasolil · 159
#10
همستر/تپسواپ/تایم فارم/ماسک امپایر
@airdrop_bazz1 · 116
#11
🤍♡هرات من☽وتو☾♡🤍
@qanaweze · 334
#12
زروان | zorone
@zor_one · 742
#13
Cₕₐₙₙₑₗ Fₐₙₒₛ
@TOPPROFIL5566 · 427
#14
𝗤 𝗔𝗶𝗿𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗽
@Q_Airdrap2024 · 286
#15
𝐞𝐅𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐥
@efootball_2024_time · 33
#16
𝘿𝙖𝙧𝙠 𝙉𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩
@Darrk_nightt · 220
#17
H Na
@vadafuckkk · 2
#18
👼𝑫𝒆𝒂𝒅 𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒆𝒍✨
@Angel_00666 · 1,451
#19
überdenken☼︎
@over403 · 276
#20
🧸♪·¯·♫¸¸ لبخند عشق ¸¸♫♥️
@Smileoflov04 · 1,363 (as read 29 August 2026)
#21
دَچار تو🖤
@ROMANTIC136 · 1,260
#22
معلم القرآن
@alqoran1403 · 207
#23
𝘖𝘟𝘒.Ӡ❗🔇
@lKYNl_1X · 1,266
#24
ماهیتِ‌گمشده.
@deadam33 · 1,306
#25
Number1
@nomber1mz · 143 (as read 29 August 2026)
#26
⋆ִֶָ𓏲࣪ꪫ𝑁𝐴𝑅𝐶𝐼𝑆_𝐴𝑅𝑇ִֶָ🎪⛧
@narcisHonarmand · 15,790
#27
Blockchainyar
@blockchain_yar · 1,660
#28
𝙑𝙚𝙡𝙤𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙖𐙚
@afterlosinggg · 291 (as read 29 August 2026)
#29
Geraniums
@RadHabits · 3,147
#30
She
@lv2mohiw · 159
#31

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

QuickPing Vpn | فیلترشکن کوییک پینگ
@QuickPing · 151,750
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐄𝐋 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐋𝐄𝐒 🐋” (@Chanel_Whales), 67,955 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chanel_Whales.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.