Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net +1,859. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,094–64,511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 10:55
64,232
+111
5 Nov 2026, 08:41
64,121
+82
4 Nov 2026, 05:57
64,039
+29
3 Nov 2026, 02:59
64,010
+49
2 Nov 2026, 03:58
63,961
-5
1 Nov 2026, 02:29
63,966
+21
31 Oct 2026, 02:59
63,945
+36
30 Oct 2026, 02:40
63,909
+116
29 Oct 2026, 02:56
63,793
+41
27 Oct 2026, 22:20
63,752
-35
26 Oct 2026, 22:28
63,787
-19
26 Oct 2026, 00:48
63,806
+3
25 Oct 2026, 04:16
63,803
+1
24 Oct 2026, 01:11
63,802
+31
22 Oct 2026, 23:56
63,771
+77
21 Oct 2026, 21:29
63,694
+36
20 Oct 2026, 13:26
63,658
+33
19 Oct 2026, 14:15
63,625
+61
18 Oct 2026, 14:40
63,564
-6
17 Oct 2026, 16:20
63,570
first reading
Engagement
941 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 201 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.67%
avg views ÷ 64,232 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,360
189 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
189
of 941 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 170 of 189 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
941 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
445,646
Reactions total
5,800
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 19:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈11,900
Videos
≈6,080
Links
≈26
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 34m
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 281 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
18,965 reactions across 651 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
4,759
25.1%
❤
4,521
23.8%
👎
2,468
13.0%
👍
2,451
12.9%
😁
2,400
12.7%
💔
1,090
5.75%
🔥
566
2.98%
❤🔥
206
1.09%
😐
154
0.812%
🗿
130
0.685%
🤔
80
0.422%
🤯
63
0.332%
💯
47
0.248%
🏆
16
0.084%
😱
14
0.074%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 673 of the 941 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,965 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 941 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 189 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
.
گلایه تارتار از هواداران پرسپولیس: اینکه نمیتوانیم موقعیتها را تبدیل به گل کنیم به خاطر فشار سکوهاست! با این رفتار هواداران، استرس به بازیکنان وارد میشود، بازیکنان ما خیلی هم باتجربه نیستند و تحت تأثیر شعار هواداران قرار میگیرند
امروز شرمنده هواداران شدیم و مسئولیت را بر عهده میگیرم، یک روزهایی روز ما نیست، باختیم و نمیخواهم بهانه بگیرم اما مصدومیتها به ما ضربه زد
ژوزه مورینیو : امیدوارم خداحافظی رونالدو از فوتبال طور دیگه ای رقم بخورد و مثل چیزی که دیروز دیدیم نباشد 💔
من نمیخواهم قضاوت کنم. فکر میکنم بهجای اظهارنظر کردن، باید به تصمیم او احترام بگذاریم. و من قطعاً به تصمیمش احترام میگذارم. این به معنای بازنشستگی نیست؛ او هنوز دوران حرفهای فوتبالش را به پایان نرسانده است.
کسانی که او را میشناسند، میدانند که هنوز اهدافی در دوران حرفهای خود دارد.
تنها چیزی که من میخواهم…
پرسپولیسِ گل گهر همینه همینه !
بلاتکلیفی تماشاگران پرسپولیس روی سکوها ؛ شعار ها یکی در میان عوض میشد!
بعد از گل دوم فجر تماشاگران پرسپولیس شعارهایی مثل پرسپولیس گل گهر همینه همینه و پیرهن قرمز بابا غیرت داده سر دادند اما سپس برای دقایقی شعارها به پرسپولیس باغیرت تغییر یافت!
ظاهرا با دخالت برخی لیدرها مثل فصول گذشته شعارها عوض میشد
در پایان بازی هم شعار تارتار حیا کن رها کن سر داده شد.
اقدام فوری علیه بازیکنان و کادر فنی پرسپولیس
باشگاه پرسپولیس پس از باخت برابر فجر، اعضای کادر فنی را به میزان ۱۵ درصد و بازیکنان را به میزان ۱۰ درصدجریمه کرد
.
ژرژ ژسوس: از رونالدو خواستم کنارم بماند اما باید تصمیم او را بپذیرم
کریستیانو یک نماد جهانی است، الگویی برای پرتغال و تیم ملی، من عکس بزرگی از او را در سالن اجتماعات تیم ملی نصب کردم تا همه بازیکنان جوان هر روز بتوانند از او الگو بگیرند
پرتغال باید یک بازی خداحافظی مناسب برای او برگزار کند، نباید به اسطورهای مانند کریستیانو رونالدو اجازه دهید از در پشتی برود حتی اگر معتقد باشد که دورانش تمام شده است!
.
واکنش برونو فرناندز به خداحافظی رونالدو: ممنون که مرا زیر بالوپر خودت گرفتی
هیچ کلمهای نمیتواند بهاندازه کافی نشان دهد که تو چه جایگاهی در زندگی من داشتهای، هم بهعنوان یک همتیمی، هم یک برادر و یک راهنما... ممنونم کریس که مرا زیر بالوپر خودت گرفتی، به من ایمان داشتی، به چالش کشیدی تا بازیکن بهتری شوم
پرتغال تا ابد قدردانت خواهد بود و من همیشه سپاسگزارم که این فرصت را داشتم تا تو را کاپیتان خودم بدانم، حتی …
بیانیه رسمی فدراسیون پرتغال در مورد خداحافظی رونالدو
بیش از یک ورزشکار برجسته، کاپیتان ما، رهبری الهامبخش، الگویی از تعهد و نماد اصلی روح تیم ملی بود...، نمیخواهیم اجازه دهیم این خداحافظی بدون ادای احترامی شایسته انجام شود، قصد داریم در برگزاری مراسمی در شأن دوران حرفهای عظیم کریستیانو رونالدو مشارکت کنیم، مراسمی که هواداران و مردم پرتغال بتوانند بار دیگر بازیکنی را که خدمات زیادی به ما ارائه کرده، تشویق و تجلیل …
فوری، رسمی و باورنکردنی؛ پس از فروکش کردن تمام حواشی و جنجالیها، سلطان کریستیانو رونالدو به طور ناگهانی از تیم ملی پرتغال خداحافظی کرد.
💔82😁11❤4🤣3😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 941 posts we hold for @varzeshe433. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 53 posts on @varzeshe433 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
32 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
24
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
متن وشوخی @digimoviez_kingmovie · 79,234 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
Football Daf news 📰 @football_Dafnews · 20,992 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 23 September 2026
FOTBALL News @futbal_180 · 76,894 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
گاف | gaff @GaffChannel · 32,544 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026
‘“زبان با معصومه کاظمی”’ @englishmasoume · 38,202 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 30 August 2026
خبرگزاری موج @mojnews_ir · 22,430 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار ورزشی” (@varzeshe433), 64,232 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/varzeshe433.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.