⏳ وبینار شروع شد! همه آنلاین هستید؟ 👀🔥 برای ورود به وبینار همین الان روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید 👇 🚨 Webinar Aradfx
❤39👍10👎8💔4

Channel
@vebinararad
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
13,675subscribers
+3,754 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1004309522298 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vebinararad |
| Created | 11 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 52 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vebinararad |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 31% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 12:34 | 13,675 | -11 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:05 | 13,686 | -9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:47 | 13,695 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:56 | 13,704 | +9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:17 | 13,695 | +1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:16 | 13,694 | +11 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:16 | 13,683 | +16 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:47 | 13,667 | +3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 17:01 | 13,664 | -16 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:34 | 13,680 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 13,687 | -18 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:06 | 13,705 | -21 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:38 | 13,726 | +12 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:26 | 13,714 | +11 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:28 | 13,703 | +8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 13,695 | -13 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:59 | 13,708 | -13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 13,721 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 09:55 | 13,729 | -22 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:38 | 13,751 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (11 August 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 215,330 |
| Reactions total | 2,515 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 06:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
6,724 reactions across 41 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,510 | 67.1% | |
| 👍 | 1,203 | 17.9% | |
| 🔥 | 547 | 8.14% | |
| 👏 | 118 | 1.75% | |
| 👎 | 100 | 1.49% | |
| 🤔 | 68 | 1.01% | |
| 🤯 | 42 | 0.625% | |
| 🙏 | 40 | 0.595% | |
| 😁 | 35 | 0.521% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 0.238% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 0.164% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 0.134% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 0.119% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 0.104% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 0.059% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 0.059% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,724 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (29.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
⏳ وبینار شروع شد! همه آنلاین هستید؟ 👀🔥 برای ورود به وبینار همین الان روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید 👇 🚨 Webinar Aradfx
❤39👍10👎8💔4
اطلاع رسانی وبینار pinned a photo
راهنمای ورود به وبینار آراد آکادمی 👇 برای شرکت در وبینار، فقط این ۵ مرحله رو انجام بده: مرحله ۱ | ورود یا ثبتنام 📱 روی «ورود / ثبتنام» بزن، شماره موبایلت رو وارد کن و بعد از دریافت پیامک، کد تأیید رو وارد کن. مرحله ۲ | تست شخصیت سرمایهگذاری 🧠 تست شخصیت سرمایهگذاری رو شروع کن و به سوالات پاسخ بده تا پروفایل سرمایهگذاری مخصوص خودت ساخته بشه. مرحله ۳ | مشاهده پرتفوی پیشنهادی 📊 بعد از تکمیل تست، پرتفوی هدف و پیش…
❤32👍4😁1
🗳 انتخابات آمریکا؛ جرقه یک رالی بزرگ در والاستریت؟ 🇺🇸📈 ❓تاریخ چه چیزی به ما میگه؟ 🔅بررسی عملکرد شاخص S&P 500 از سال ۱۹۷۴ نشون میده که در ۱۱ مورد از ۱۳ انتخابات میاندورهای آمریکا، بازار سهام طی سه ماه بعد از انتخابات رشد کرده! 🔹 میانگین بازدهی این دورهها هم حدود ۵.۷ درصد بوده. 💡 اما دلیل این رشد چیه؟ تقسیم قدرت بین دو حزب میتونه احتمال تصویب تغییرات بزرگ اقتصادی رو کاهش بده و با کمشدن بخشی از عدمقطعیتهای…
❤36🔥34👍7⚡4👏1
‼️ شوک جدید به بازار خودرو؛ تعرفه واردات حداقل ۱۰۰ درصد شد! 🪙 طبق مصوبه جدید شورای عالی هماهنگی اقتصادی سران قوا، تعرفه واردات خودرو در سال ۱۴۰۵ افزایش یافت! 🔺 خودروهای بنزینی و هیبریدی: حداقل ۱۰۰٪ 🔺 واردات به مناطق آزاد: حداقل ۶۰٪ 🔺 خودروهای تمامبرقی: مستثنا از این مصوبه 💳 یعنی چقدر گرونتر؟ فرض کنید یک خودروی لوکس با ارزش گمرکی ۵ میلیارد تومان وارد کشور بشه؛ با تعرفه ۱۰۰ درصدی، فقط حقوق ورودی اون میتونه به ۵…
👎88❤37💔9👍4👏3
💰 طلا عقب نشست؛ چشم بازار به تصمیم امشب آمریکا انس طلا در معاملات صبح با ۰.۷٪ افت به محدوده ۴٬۰۳۰ دلار رسید؛ نقره هم حدود ۱٪ کاهش داشت. 🛢 رشد نفت، نگرانی از تورم و تداوم نرخ بهره بالا را تقویت کرده و به فلزات گرانبها فشار آورده است. ⏰ امشب ساعت ۲۱:۳۰ به وقت تهران، تصمیم نرخ بهره فدرال رزرو اعلام میشود. انتظار غالب، ثابتماندن نرخ است؛ اما پیام بانک مرکزی درباره مسیر بعدی نرخ بهره برای بازار اهمیت دارد. 🔗 https:…
❤70👍5🔥3🏆2👏1
💸بیتکوین؛ هدف ۱۵۰ تا ۲۰۰ هزار دلار در ۲ تا ۴ سال آینده؟ 📊 نمودار بلندمدت بیتکوین داره به یه تقاطع مهم بین دو میانگین متحرک EMA 200 و SMA 350 نزدیک میشه؛ اتفاقی که میتونه نشونه تغییر روند بازار باشه. 📈 از نگاه ما، اگه این الگو تأیید بشه و روند صعودی ادامه پیدا کنه، بیتکوین میتونه در بازه ۲ تا ۴ سال آینده اهداف ۱۵۰ تا ۲۰۰ هزار دلار رو دنبال کنه. ⚠️ اما یه نکته مهم! اینکه بیتکوین ممکنه به ۲۰۰ هزار دلار برسه، ب…
❤50👍6🔥4👏1
🛢 نفت عقب نشست؛ امید بازار به دیپلماسی نفت برنت در معاملات صبح دوشنبه با ۱.۸٪ کاهش به ۱۱۴.۵۷ دلار رسید؛ امید به کاهش تنش ایران و آمریکا، بخشی از رشد هفته گذشته را پس گرفت. 📌 با این حال، حملات تازه در عربستان و نگرانی درباره عرضه همچنان پابرجاست؛ افت امروز نفت بهمعنای رفع خطر درگیری نیست. 📰 والاستریتژورنال | ۴ آبان 🔗 https://t.me/vebinararad
❤58👍10💔3🔥2😁2
🛢 نفت بالای ۱۱۱ دلار؛ نگرانی از اختلال عرضه نفت برنت در معاملات صبح پنجشنبه با ۲.۶٪ رشد به ۱۱۱.۶۴ دلار رسید؛ حملات تازه در عربستان و نگرانی از گسترش درگیریها، بازار نفت را صعودی کرد. ⚠️ ادامه ناامنی در تأسیسات نفتی و مسیرهای کشتیرانی میتواند فشار بیشتری بر عرضه و قیمت انرژی وارد کند.🕯 📰 رویترز | ۳۰ مهر 🔗 https://t.me/vebinararad
❤65👍11🔥7👏1
🎙🛵 ۱۸ حمله به شناورها در دو هفته رویترز به نقل از «کپلر» از ثبت دستکم ۱۸ حمله به شناورها طی دو هفته گذشته خبر داد. تحلیلگران LSEG نیز درباره گسترش تهدید نفتکشها به دریای عمان هشدار دادهاند. 🛢 ادامه ناامنی میتواند هزینه حمل و بیمه نفت را افزایش دهد و به رشد قیمتها فشار بیاورد. 🔗 https://t.me/vebinararad
❤70👍4👎3🔥2
💸 چشمانداز بلندمدت بیتکوین؛ رشد یا اصلاح بیشتر؟ ⁉️ به نظر شما بیتکوین در افق ۲ تا ۴ سال آینده چه مسیری رو طی میکنه؟ آیا شاهد ثبت سقفهای تاریخی جدید خواهیم بود یا اصلاحهای عمیقتری در انتظار بازاره؟ ✍️ قصد داریم در یک تحلیل جامع، سناریوهای بلندمدت بیتکوین، اهداف قیمتی و محدودههای مهم ورود رو بررسی کنیم. 🔥 اگر علاقهمندید این تحلیل رو منتشر کنیم، با ریاکشن “🔥” به ما اطلاع بدید. در صورت استقبال شما، تحلیل ا…
🔥448❤87👍34
🇫🇷 فرانسه در آتش؛ دلایل پشت پرده چیست؟ اعتراضات شنبه ۲۵ مهر، ۱۷ اکتبر در فرانسه؛ دانشآموزان، معلمان، اتحادیههای کارگری و بخشی از جلیقهزردها را کنار هم آورد و در ادامه معترضان دیگر به آنها اضافه شدند. 🔹 جرقه اولیه؛ وضعیت مدارس موج اخیر از شهریور، در دبیرستانهای محلههای کارگری شمال پاریس شروع شد: کمبود معلم، کلاسهای شلوغ و امکانات فرسوده. اعتراض آموزشی بهتدریج با نارضایتی از نابرابری و هزینههای زندگی پیوند خ…
❤96👍31👏11
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @vebinararad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 3 posts on @vebinararad as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📉 با اصلاح اخیر قیمت طلا، سوال مهم اینکه آیا بازار به حمایت های اصلی خودش رسیده یا هنوز احتمال ریزش بیشتر وجود داره؟
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اطلاع رسانی وبینار” (@vebinararad), 13,675 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vebinararad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.