Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -2,853. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 241,508–245,217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 14:38
241,936
-183
17 Sept 2026, 00:00
242,119
-152
15 Sept 2026, 03:55
242,271
-145
13 Sept 2026, 11:15
242,416
-145
11 Sept 2026, 14:59
242,561
-169
8 Sept 2026, 21:58
242,730
-370
5 Sept 2026, 13:35
243,100
-138
3 Sept 2026, 12:37
243,238
-41
2 Sept 2026, 09:54
243,279
-38
1 Sept 2026, 09:44
243,317
-77
31 Aug 2026, 06:25
243,394
+47
30 Aug 2026, 04:48
243,347
-12
29 Aug 2026, 03:44
243,359
-85
28 Aug 2026, 00:43
243,444
-85
26 Aug 2026, 23:47
243,529
-98
26 Aug 2026, 02:53
243,627
+152
25 Aug 2026, 01:43
243,475
+407
23 Aug 2026, 14:58
243,068
-137
22 Aug 2026, 03:09
243,205
-131
20 Aug 2026, 19:48
243,336
first reading
Engagement
173 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
44.6%
avg views ÷ 241,936 subscribers
Avg views / post
108,000
109 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
109
of 173 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
173 (29 July 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
11,749,700
Reactions total
156,122
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 19:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,400
Videos
≈743
Links
≈81
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 56s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
251,925 reactions across 173 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
168,167
66.8%
👍
34,671
13.8%
💔
28,261
11.2%
🔥
12,261
4.87%
👏
6,919
2.75%
🥰
1,646
0.653%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 173 of the 173 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 251,925 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 173 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بنظر من به این خبرا توجه نکنید، فقط من منتظر جلسه پنجشنبه بین رییس جمهور چین و ترامپ ام اگر خبر خوبی بیاد درباره مذاکرات که اونم بعیده بعد اون جلسه میاد چون چین تنها کشوریه که میتونه میانجی باشه در این شرایط و هر دو کشور بهش اهمیت بدن که فکر نمیکنم چین بلیطشو برای ایران بسوزونه…
@fx_aradt
رویترز نوشته ایران به آمریکا پیشنهاد مذاکره مجدد و باز کردن تنگه هرمز طی ۷ روز رو داده به شرطی که آمریکا دیگه حمله نکنه و محاصره دریایی رو برداره و از اونورم سخنگوی سپاه گفته اگر مذاکره در مصلحت کشور باشه در کنار آمادگی نظامی مشکل نداره…
سر همینم نفت یکم اصلاح کرده اما دلار و طلا واکنشی به این خبر ندادن…
@fx_aradt
بریم سراغ تحلیل دلار و طلا
دیروز بهتون چی گفتم؟ گفتم با رفتن عراقچی به نیویورک برای شرکت در نشست سازمان ملل یذره هیجان بازار میخوابه و تقاضا برای چند روز مقطعی کم میشه، حالا این سفر عراقچی هم زمان شده با سفر نقوی وزیر کشور پاکستان به تهران برای همینم طلا برگشت به کانال ۲۳ میلیون و دلارم اومد زیر ۲۳۰ هزارتومن…
@fx_aradt
🚨ترامپ گفته میخوام پزشکیانو ببینم ، اینو باور کنیم یا افزایش درگیری رو؟
درباره دلار و طلا هم خدمتتون توضیح دادم پس خواهشااا بادقت تا انتها گوش بدید🙏
@fx_aradt
دلار ۲۳۳ هزارتومان و طلا ۲۴ میلیون و ۳۰۰ داره معامله میشه…
کی دقیقا توی کف ۲۲۶ هزارتومنی دلار و ۲۳ میلیونی طلا گفت بخرید رشد بزودی شروع میشه؟ استفاده کردی ایندفه از سیگنال خریدمون؟ یا باز جاموندی؟
@fx_aradt
حقیقتا بازار و معامله گران دلار و طلا اهمیتی به حرفای محسن رضایی دبیر شورای عالی امنیت ملی درجهت مذاکره با آمریکا ندادن
همه میگن اگر عراقچی و پزشکیان رفتن آمریکا برای نشست سازمان ملل تازه اونموقع شاید امیدی باشه برای مذاکره غیر مستقیم و هنوز همه بدبین هستن نسبت به بازار ...
@fx_aradt
خبر فوری: محسن رضایی :
«دولت قطر شرایط ایران برای پایان جنگ را به امریکا انتقال داده است،ما منتظر پاسخ آنها هستیم»
@fx_aradt
❤666👍208💔62🔥62👏35🥰15
Showing the 12 most recent of 173 posts we hold for @fx_aradt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
یه سوال خیلی مهم👇
از همتون میخوام بهش پاسخ بدید چون یه موضوع مهم رو میخوام خدمتتون توضیح بدم چقدر از درآمدتون هر ماه میمونه که بتونید پس اندازش کنید و سرمایه گذاری کنید؟👇
اصلا پولی نمیمونه که پس انداز کنیم52%
بین ۱ تا ۵ میلیون17%
۵تا ۱۰ میلیون10%
زیر ۲۰ میلیون7%
۲۰ تا ۵۰ میلیون7%
بالای ۵۰ میلیون7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 173 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
قیمت لحظه ای طلا و آبشده - طلاین | Taline.ir @TalinePrice · 21,255#54
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تحلیل روزانه و رایگان طلا - اکو رادفر @eco_radfar · 28,571 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 9 September 2026
uniquegold|یونیک گلد @uniquegoldd · 108,007 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 16 August 2026
علی اوشانی | alioshani @alioshani · 35,234 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
آموزش زبان با پرنیان @parniyan_english · 40,261 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 30 August 2026
EcoKhavand | اکوخاوند @eco_khavand · 120,135 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
کانال اصلی راضیه لیدیباس @ladyboss_etemad · 101,233 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 15 August 2026
اقتصاد با متاسینا @metacena · 24,441 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
صدای بازار / تحلیل طلا @AbshodeNaghdi · 25,529 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 14 September 2026
فرامعتمد | faramotamed @faramotameed · 55,609 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
بورس ارزنده @Boursearzandeh · 22,892 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 19 September 2026
قیمت لحظهای طلا دلار سکه @nerkhzani · 47,820 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 27 August 2026
کانال خبری و تحلیلی امیر احمدی @amirahmadifar_ir · 68,357 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Richman : یاسین هدایتی فر @pedarepuldar · 31,311 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
کیا اسکندری | بیتکوین | سیگنال @kiaeskandari · 23,686 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
Saeed rezapoor @saeed_rezapoorr · 136,241 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال خبری تحلیلی (fx_arad)” (@fx_aradt), 241,936 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fx_aradt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.