Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Virtus.pro CS2

Channel

Virtus.pro CS2

@virtuspro_cs2

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

22,882subscribers

-413 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001847873489
TypeChannel
Username@virtuspro_cs2
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/virtuspro_cs2

Growth

22,88223,29523,088.56 August 2026 — 23,295 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,295 subscribers6 August 2026 — 23,293 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,280 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,264 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,228 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,198 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,180 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,162 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,151 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,115 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,089 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,069 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,068 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,057 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,026 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,011 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,993 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,977 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,954 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,927 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,906 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,882 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 23 days, net -413. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,820–23,357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 07:3722,882-24
28 Aug 2026, 04:3722,906-21
27 Aug 2026, 03:4722,927-27
26 Aug 2026, 00:4622,954-23
25 Aug 2026, 03:4622,977-16
24 Aug 2026, 00:3222,993-18
22 Aug 2026, 06:3423,011-15
20 Aug 2026, 21:5823,026-31
19 Aug 2026, 19:4523,057-11
18 Aug 2026, 20:1523,068-1
17 Aug 2026, 21:0523,069-20
16 Aug 2026, 20:5723,089-26
15 Aug 2026, 14:1723,115-36
14 Aug 2026, 02:1423,151-11
12 Aug 2026, 19:3523,162-18
11 Aug 2026, 21:5423,180-18
10 Aug 2026, 18:2223,198-30
9 Aug 2026, 15:1223,228-36
8 Aug 2026, 13:1723,264-16
7 Aug 2026, 16:0023,280first reading

Engagement

72 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 22,882 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,000
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 72 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held72 (30 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total215,790
Reactions total4,305
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 33s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,280 reactions across 71 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,25352.6%
🤣68716.1%
🔥4249.91%
👍2455.72%
❤‍🔥1553.62%
💔1373.20%
😁721.68%
🫡581.36%
😭541.26%
🦄370.864%
😈210.491%
🏆200.467%
👏180.421%
🙏170.397%
💯110.257%
😍110.257%
🗿90.21%
70.164%
🍓60.14%
💘60.14%
7 further kinds320.748%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,305reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 72 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @virtuspro_cs2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 72 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC910 views37 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Путь 🐻 VP.Future на Kibertochka Season 2 завершается здесь 😔

💔20🤣7🔥3😢32❤‍🔥2

28 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC≈1,360 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🐻 VP.Future продолжают свой путь на LAN-турнире Kibertochka S2! Первый раунд нижней сетки 🆚 Team Tricksters 🎦 Стрим Virtus.pro 🎦 Прямой эфир

14🔥4👍3

27 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC≈1,690 views41 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Встреча 🆚 ex-RUSTEC для 🐻 VP.Future заканчивается поражением. Парни сыграют завтра в первом раунде нижней сетки 👀

30👍5🔥3😱2💔1

27 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC≈1,780 views30 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Смотрим матч 🐻 VP.Future на LAN-турнире Kibertochka S2! Парни играют 🆚 ex-RUSTEC 🎦 Стрим Virtus.pro 🎦 Прямой эфир

21👍5🫡4

27 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC≈1,810 views40 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

27👍8🔥5

24 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC≈3,820 views44 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

На B-пленте опять фотограф? Оно и понятно, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra завораживает качеством своих снимков 😳 Хорошая новость для любителей пофоткать: теперь делать качественные снимки ещё проще с широкоугольной камерой с 200 МП и съёмкой видео в 8К. Делись этим постом со своим фотографом — ему точно понравится Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra 📷 Кстати, приобрести его можно в М.Видео 🩷

❤‍🔥25🔥7😈63😁3

24 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈2,590 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @virtuspro_faceitPhoto

Мы рады анонсировать запуск второго сезона лидербордов совместно с fifine! Участвовать может любой желающий, а на кону — топовые стримерские микрофоны! Стартуем в 17:00 МСК: 🇬🇧 клик! Призовой фонд: 1-4 место — fifine AM8ProT 5-8 место — fifine AM8 9-12 место — fifine K688 13-16 место — fifine TANK3 17-20 место — 12.500 Faceit Points Пора затачивать когти и показывать кто здесь самый сильный Медведь 💅

12👍3❤‍🔥1🔥1🤣1😁1

17 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC≈3,590 views57 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Матч заканчивается не в нашу пользу, покидаем EPL Regular S6.

💔35🤣146🔥2

17 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC≈3,290 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Четвертьфинал нижней сетки против WOPA Esport 🤪 🎦 Трансляция

24👍5🔥4

15 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC≈3,320 views44 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Победа в кармане 😏 Дальше молодёжный состав ждёт четвертьфинал нижней сетки турнира 🔥

29🔥9🙏6

15 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC≈2,880 views28 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Молодые Медведи стартуют матч нижней сетки плей-офф EPL Regular S6 👇 🎦 Трансляция

18🔥6💘4

Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @virtuspro_cs2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 831 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DEGSTER
@degsterof · 49,875
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
гет борис
@getboris · 81,509
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Team Spirit CS2
@TSpiritCS · 222,866
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
WINLINE CS2
@winline_cs · 68,191
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
BETBOOM Esports CS2
@betboom_esports_cs · 120,713
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
sh1ro
@sh1rocs2 · 70,603
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
chopper:O
@chopperis · 114,375
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 August 2026
WINLINE Dota 2
@winline_dota · 78,044
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
OverDrive | 20 ЛЕТ В АРКАДЕ
@ihuntnoobs · 212,339
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
SL4M & Counter-Strike
@sl4mtv · 81,651
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Закулисье CS2
@cs2valve2 · 90,154
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026
Со SNEWSычем | Ньюсыч
@snewscsgo · 62,905
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Virtus.pro (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…Кайсар «ICY» Файзнуров был переведён в запас{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/virtuspro_cs2/2649|title=Virtus.pro CS2|website=Telegram|access-date=202…”
read 23 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Virtus.pro CS2” (@virtuspro_cs2), 22,882 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/virtuspro_cs2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.