Photo, posted without a caption
🤣12😱4👏1🤔1

Channel
@vladlenanalog
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,802subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001597327969 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vladlenanalog |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vladlenanalog |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 2,802 | +9 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 2,793 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 2,795 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:35 | 2,797 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 2,801 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:58 | 2,800 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 2,795 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 2,796 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 2,792 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 2,790 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 2,789 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 2,789 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
201 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 75 | 37.3% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 15.9% | |
| 💯 | 23 | 11.4% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 7.46% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 5.97% | |
| 🤯 | 12 | 5.97% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 3.48% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 2.99% | |
| 🥴 | 6 | 2.99% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 1.99% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 1.99% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.995% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 0.995% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.498% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣12😱4👏1🤔1
🤷🏻♀️Не так уж у нас всё плохо. Есть куда стремиться.🙈⬇️
Приятное начало дня. 💃🏻
🔥22
🔰Но моя аудитория это предприниматели, а не неработающие граждане. Потому сегодня хочу обсудить другую тему.⬇️ В последнее время приходит много требований клиентам, и если количество таких запросов от ФНС растёт, то качество проверок оставляет желать лучшего...🙈Сталкиваюсь с тем, что некоторые инспекторы не до конца понимают, что именно проверяют и какой результат хотят получить от налогоплательщика.🤷🏻♀️ А недавно…
👍13❤3
❗️Сегодня все экономические паблики обсуждают эту новость. Кому интересно почитать, даю ссылку.
👍2😁2👏1
❓Почему я не рекомендую продавать и покупать юрлица своим клиентам. (по следам консультаций) ❗️Если ПОКУПАЕТЕ ЮЛ - вы не знаете всех подводных камней, которые могут всплыть в данной организации после покупки: ✅ Скрытые долги и обязательства. При покупке доли в компании покупатель берёт на себя её финансовые обязательства — в том числе скрытые. В отчётности могут не отражаться неоплаченные счета, займы (в т. ч. от с…
❤5🔥3
Мошенники начали покупать действующие компании с хорошей репутацией и оборотами для обмана предпринимателей. Они меняют руководство и предлагают лжепоставки с предоплатой. Сервисы проверки благонадёжности бизнеса показывают высокий рейтинг доверия, зеленый статус безопасности и достаточный возраст, поэтому бизнесмены соглашаются на заманчивые сделки. Например, предприниматель перевел 33 млн рублей фирме, которая обе…
🤯12
🔰Этот вопрос про коммунальные услуги часто звучит у меня на консультациях. Почему моя позиция, что коммунальные услуги это тоже плата за аренду и арендодатель должен платить с этих сумм налоги, почитайте ниже.⬇️
💩1
💸 Вчера смотрел ролики в интернете от налоговых «коучей». Как сэкономить на налогах. Посмотрел штук 19. Плакал и жалел потребителей этих «методов». Интересные мысли в части спонсоров этих блогеров в голове стаями летали…. Но бывают и такие примитивные потуги оптимизации из серии - пронесет и авось не увидят, так как я маленький и все так делают… ИП. Арендный бизнес. Плата за аренду и коммунальные платежи… 📃 Главное …
❤3🔥2💩1😭1
Закон о поддержке "Почты России" приняла Госдума. Главное из него и поправок: 🔹"Почта" создаст электронную систему для юридически значимых сообщений. Госорганы будут отправлять гражданам и бизнесу уведомления через "Госуслуги". 🔹Для всех юрлиц и ИП на "Госуслугах" создадут электронные почтовые ящики, за них будут брать ежемесячную плату, которую установит правительство. Если не платить, то доступ к ящику приостанов…
🥴6😁2🤔1
⚡️ Главное налоговое решение июля: порог НДС для УСН заморожен до 2029 года 4 июля принят закон № 228-ФЗ, который сдвигает график снижения лимита доходов для освобождения от НДС на упрощёнке. Было (по старому плану): 2026 — 20 млн → 2027 — 15 млн → 2028 — 10 млн руб. Стало (новые правила): ✅ 2026–2029 гг. — 20 млн руб. ✅ 2030 г. — 15 млн руб. ✅ 2031 г. и далее — 10 млн руб. ⚠️ Важный нюанс: Для ПСН (патента) стар…
🔥11
Очень много вопросов по предыдущему посту. Давайте распишу всё. ⬇️
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vladlenanalog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@vladlenanalog named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Владлена | Налоги и бизнес” (@vladlenanalog), 2,802 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vladlenanalog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.