Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -299. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,655–37,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 15:40
36,700
-37
16 Sept 2026, 05:58
36,737
-27
14 Sept 2026, 13:41
36,764
-19
13 Sept 2026, 00:02
36,783
-53
11 Sept 2026, 01:57
36,836
-25
8 Sept 2026, 05:16
36,861
-37
5 Sept 2026, 03:16
36,898
-13
3 Sept 2026, 10:43
36,911
-18
2 Sept 2026, 05:16
36,929
+59
1 Sept 2026, 03:07
36,870
+2
31 Aug 2026, 04:16
36,868
-9
30 Aug 2026, 01:44
36,877
-7
28 Aug 2026, 23:58
36,884
-9
28 Aug 2026, 02:57
36,893
-3
27 Aug 2026, 05:03
36,896
-5
26 Aug 2026, 02:53
36,901
-12
25 Aug 2026, 00:46
36,913
-10
23 Aug 2026, 14:37
36,923
-4
21 Aug 2026, 22:14
36,927
-5
20 Aug 2026, 16:16
36,932
first reading
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 36,700 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,410
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
59 (27 July 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
118,950
Reactions total
1,928
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 13:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,080
Videos
≈184
Links
≈691
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 53s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,466 reactions across 58 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,774
51.2%
🔥
562
16.2%
🤗
333
9.61%
🌚
314
9.06%
😎
148
4.27%
👍
139
4.01%
😁
111
3.20%
👎
19
0.548%
🤩
13
0.375%
🤨
9
0.26%
🎉
8
0.231%
🤔
8
0.231%
🤪
8
0.231%
👀
6
0.173%
👌
4
0.115%
✍
3
0.087%
👏
2
0.058%
🤯
2
0.058%
🥰
2
0.058%
☃
1
0.029%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,466 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Брать страховой депозит с гостя или обходиться без него? 🤔
У посуточников нет единого ответа: одни используют залог для защиты имущества, другие выбирают доверие, договор и страховку.
В новой статье собрали мнения хостов из разных городов и разобрали, как заранее объяснить гостю условия депозита, в каких случаях его можно удержать и почему важно вернуть деньги в обещанный срок.
❤️ – брать депозит обязательно
🔥 – и…
Сезон плавно движется к завершению, и многие хосты задумываются, как работать дальше:
📌 ОСТАТЬСЯ НА КРАТКОСРОКЕ ИЛИ УЙТИ В СРЕДНЕСРОК?
Везде есть свои сильные и слабые стороны, поэтому поможем вам в них разобраться:
1️⃣ в статье узнаете, как можно выгодно комбинировать среднесрок и краткосрок;
2️⃣ плюсы краткосрочной аренды в сравнении с длительной – в записи эфира с экспертом (начало на 10-й минуте).
А как вы р…
Наша любовь к вашим историям выходит на новый уровень, ведь теперь они могут прозвучать в эфире Сдавайся.Конф
И причём не просто прозвучать, а стать главной фишкой нашего нового интерактива. Но не будем сразу раскрывать все карты. 😏
❕ Присылайте в комментарии под постом истории с неожиданной развязкой, которые происходили с вами за время работы.
Самые удивительные мы расскажем на Сдавайся.Конф и, конечно, подарим …
Даже золотой унитаз не сделает вашу фотографию привлекательнее, если она вертикальная, с заваленным горизонтом и фейковым ИИ-интерьером 🚽
Качественные фото объекта не заменят сервис и чистоту, но именно они выделяют ваш объект среди сотен других – и от вас зависит, выделится он с хорошей или плохой стороны.
Вместе с Натали Черниченко, экспертом в посуточной аренде, разбираем, как собрать фотогалерею, которая поможе…
Шаблоны сообщений – полезный инструмент, который можно использовать только после предоплаты от гостя. 🤓
Добавляйте файлы, готовьте инструкции по заселению и отправляйте в один клик (или настройте автоотправку).
Записали для вас пример с бронью по запросу – сохраняйте себе и создавайте новые шаблоны.
С проверкой на внимательность вы справились отлично, а как хорошо вы знаете шаблоны сообщений? 💬
Правила те же: викторина, четыре варианта ответа и только один верный. Ваша задача – его найти, и к вечеру мы вернёмся с инструкцией.
Контроль качества сервиса не должен превращаться в поиск ошибок и источник напряжения для сотрудников ❌
Его задача – вовремя замечать слабые места, улучшать коммуникацию с гостями и делать работу объекта более предсказуемой.
💬 В новой статье Екатерина Сафронова, руководитель направления «Сервис» компании по управлению отелями «АРДО» рассказывает, как выстроить контроль качества без давления: работать с отзывами, пр…
Увидели в чате интересный комментарий о сравнении постановочных фотографий и сгенерированных ИИ 🤔
Теперь у нас возник вопрос:
📌 А КАК ВЫ ОТНОСИТЕСЬ К ПОСТАНОВОЧНЫМ ФОТОГРАФИЯМ?
Шампанское, круассаны, цветы в каждой комнате – красиво, но гость по итогу получает совсем иную картину.
Стоит ли оно того?
❤️ – не нужно путать гостей
🔥 – использую постановочные фотографии, но указываю это в описании
🌚 – а я просто хоч…
Поднимаем вам пятничное настроение новым выпуском нашей нейросетевой рубрики 🤖
И если раньше вам нужно было понять, какой объект сгенерирован нейросетью, то теперь вам нужно найти один настоящий, ведь все остальные – дело рук ИИ.
Проверяйте свою внимательность и голосуйте ниже. А если нашли все наши пасхалки – ставьте ❤️
❤22🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @sdavajsya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@sdavajsya edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 September 2026
Most recent edit
22 September 2026
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Rentysoft | Умный доступ, замки и автоматизация @rentysoft · 302#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Суточно.ру @sutochnoru · 210,320 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 17 August 2026
Ярослав Стригунов | Недвижимость @subarendator · 29,966 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Яндекс Аренда | сдаю @yandexarenda_sdayu · 34,491 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сдавайся на Суточно.ру” (@sdavajsya), 36,700 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sdavajsya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.