Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Добрался до точки G | Влад Мурзинов

Channel

Добрался до точки G | Влад Мурзинов

@vladosmarketos

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

845subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001782272196
TypeChannel
Username@vladosmarketos
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vladosmarketos

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8458578517 August 2026 — 857 subscribers7 August 2026 — 857 subscribers7 August 2026 — 856 subscribers23 August 2026 — 851 subscribers29 August 2026 — 849 subscribers8 September 2026 — 847 subscribers16 September 2026 — 845 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 843–859 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 07:16845-2
8 Sept 2026, 01:39847-2
29 Aug 2026, 23:57849-2
23 Aug 2026, 17:55851-5
7 Aug 2026, 19:40856-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:48857no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:36857first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

204 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8742.6%
👍4019.6%
❤3919.1%
🐳2311.3%
😱62.94%
😍41.96%
❤‍🔥31.47%
custom 522470802343540463710.49%
🤯10.49%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 204 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vladosmarketos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 March 2026 to 8 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC81 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему я считаю долгую паузу в соцсетях своим лучшим решением? Недавно рассказывал про эксперта, который потерял огонёк и пропал посреди проекта. А главный прикол в том, что примерно в это же самое время мой собственный огонёк тоже потух 😅 Фокус сместился на переезд, о котором я писал выше + случилась та самая причина номер два, которая больно огрела по голове и норм так прибила к полу. И всё это одновременно, ну…

👍5🔥2❤1❤‍🔥1🐳1

7 Jul 2026, 17:13 UTC80 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Наконец крестили нашу булочку, ну что за красотка 😍 Вообще все девки у меня хороши, чего уж там)

❤9🔥8😍4

3 Jul 2026, 16:32 UTC101 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Я вам плачу, вы и делайте!" Почему эта фраза хоронит ваши продажи в соцсетях? Мой канал в телеге молчит уже больше месяца, в МАХ тоже не особо радовал контентом, но появлялся там явно чаще. Причина номер раз → переезд из квартиры в квартиру со всем нажитым за 8 лет приданым. Это оказалось охренеть какой сложной задачей, хотя на первый взгляд казалось, что всё сделаем на раз-два. Вещи по коробкам раскидал, мебель …

🔥3❤‍🔥2🐳1👍1

22 May 2026, 16:16 UTC170 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый способ мошенничества в телеграм Хотя нет, даже не в телеге, но явно от её имени. 🤬 Скамеры вышли на новый уровень и рассылают смс с посылом о том, что ваш аккаунт будет заблокирован [смотри скрин] Естественно ссылка никакого отношения к мессенджеру не имеет, но проверять, что там на самом деле, я конечно же не буду 😅 Вангую, что при переходе по этой самой ссылке вы просто потеряете доступ к аккаунту, а с ни…

👍4🤯1😱1

6 May 2026, 17:10 UTC192 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как зарегистрировать открытый канал в МАХ? Нужно пройти регистрация на сайте: https://business.max.ru/, но есть нюансы 😁👇 Если вы не ИП или ООО, то это не ваш вариант. Хотя с той же самозанятостью можно вообще без проблем перейти на режим ИП на НПД, как это сделал я, сохранив все процентные ставки по налогам) В чём разница между открытым и закрытым каналом, я рассказал в инструкции, которую для вас подготовил, за…

🔥4

1 May 2026, 13:25 UTC200 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я как Прохор Шаляпин… Все тянет на старое, хоть и сменил нишу 😁 Что-то в глубине души подсказывает, что вы заметили смену вектора в моей деятельности в последние месяца так четыре. Ну а если нет, вот краткий экскурс: • сделал самозапуск и взял в личную работу экспертов, вместе с которыми мы работаем над прокачкой личного бренда и продажами в соцсетях • веду проекты, где отвечаю за контент и продажи P.S. Сейчас …

🔥6👍4❤3

27 Apr 2026, 17:15 UTC164 views17 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

В телеге невозможно продавать в эпоху блокировок, в инфобизнесе кризис Помните, я тут недавно рассказывал, как запорол запуск с большими перспективами. Что-то в глубине души мне подсказывает, что эффект бумеранга реально существует, и Вселенная решила сполна рассчитаться со мной за тот проект) В закрытом экспертном чате ответил на такое сообщение: Добрый день! Подскажите пожалуйста, есть ли у кого контакты специа…

👍8🔥5🐳4

24 Apr 2026, 14:17 UTC186 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я нарушил главную заповедь любого эксперта Хотя нет, поправочка! Главную заповедь любого эксперта, который зарабатывает на своих соцсетях, а не просто ведёт личный дневник👇 Регулярность контента Самое страшное, что можно сделать – перестать выходить в блог. Даже если у вас прямо сейчас нет продаж или вы только начинаете вести канал, регулярность всё равно важна. Регулярность = накопительный эффект В какой-то мом…

🔥7❤6🐳6

8 Apr 2026, 16:32 UTC219 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как я запорол запуск с перспективами на 3-5 миллионов Писал тут о проекте в нише ИИ, обещал раскрыть карты чуть позже, час настал. Заголовок как бы намекает, что я обосрался, но не спешите с выводами) Что-то мне подсказывает, что данный проект был дан мне во имя прокачивания навыка отстаивания своих личных границ, экспертного мнения и идей. А, да, ещё для сбора всевозможных редфлагов, которые громко кричат всем: "…

🔥5😱5❤4🐳2custom 52247080234354046371

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @vladosmarketos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бойкий Шухрат
@BoykiyM · 21,648
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
DELO говорим
@DELO_govorim · 68,513
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 August 2026
Зубастый маркетолог
@marketolog_digital · 49,078
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
Core | Культура обучение
@Kultura_obuchenie · 51,265
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Добрался до точки G | Влад Мурзинов” (@vladosmarketos), 845 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vladosmarketos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.