Меломаны против искусственного интеллекта Музыкальный сервис решил внести ясность в происхождение треков. Теперь композиции, созданные нейросетями, получат специальную метку. Это поможет слушателям сразу понять, кто автор — человек или алгоритм. Также появилась удобная опция для тех, кто предпочитает творчество людей. Фильтр «Меньше ИИ» позволит легко настроить плейлист, убрав из него сгенерированные треки. Это шаг…

Channel
Зубастый маркетолог
@marketolog_digital
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
49,078subscribers
-508 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001157273506 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @marketolog_digital |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/marketolog_digital |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 49,078 | -39 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 49,117 | -4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 49,121 | -38 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 49,159 | -16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:57 | 49,175 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:19 | 49,177 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 49,176 | -39 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 49,215 | -26 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 49,241 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:24 | 49,246 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:43 | 49,253 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 49,262 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 49,271 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 49,278 | -30 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 49,308 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 49,317 | -33 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 49,350 | +21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 49,329 | -22 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 49,351 | -54 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 49,405 | first reading |
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.99%
- avg views ÷ 49,078 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 975
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (12 June 2026 – 25 September 2026) |
| Views total | 7,800 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Sept 2026, 18:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 44s
- Average length
- 44s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 6.06%
- 2 of 33 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 1,010
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 1,240
- over 31 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwyP1F8 | 1 | 31 July 2026 | 31 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 25 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
AI-ассистенты в России: кто и как борется за ваш запрос Российский рынок AI-ассистентов уже не пустует. Здесь и мощная "Алиса" от Яндекса, и вездесущий Google, и набирающий обороты DeepSeek. Даже западные ChatGPT и Claude нашли своих пользователей. Конкуренция стала глобальной, а ставки — высокими. Крупные игроки вкладываются в технологии и дистрибуцию, стремясь занять место в каждом смартфоне. Пользователям остает…
Личная история основателя как маркетинговый актив Кажется, что биография основателя — это про историю, а на деле — про стратегию. Личная история становится мощным маркетинговым инструментом, который работает на репутацию и доверие. В тексте разобрали, как создать такую биографию: от работы с архивами и интервью до выстраивания сюжета и определения голоса героя. Разберите структуру проекта.
Apple показала мощные компьютеры за 2 года до продаж В Apple снова удивили, анонсировав новые Mac за два года до старта продаж. Это редкий ход, когда компания показывает железо так заранее, заставляя рынок ждать. Это чистейший маркетинг предвкушения. Они создали ажиотаж, заморозили часть решений о покупке конкурентов и дали время рынку подготовиться. Гениальный ход для удержания лидерства. Зубастый маркетолог | 📵 …
Читателю нужен маршрут, а не склад знаний Сильная книга держится на выборе: кому она нужна, что у этого человека болит и куда вы его ведёте. Всё остальное либо работает на этот маршрут, либо просится в следующую книгу. Разберите план книги по шагам.
Почему компании скупают старые книги оптом Замечали, как взлетели цены на старый книжный хлам? Сейчас букинисты получают заказы на тысячи совершенно случайных книг — от кулинарных сборников до забытых романов. И покупателям не важна цена, лишь бы партия была большой. Всё просто: за этими заказами стоят ИИ. Нейросетям для обучения нужны огромные массивы текстов, а свежие данные часто защищены авторским правом. Стары…
Макдоналдс знает о вас больше, чем вы думаете Журналист Wired попросил у сети свой файл лояльности. Ему прислали 515 страниц подробного досье. В нем был не только список всех заказов, но и прогноз: в следующие полтора месяца он посетит заведения 2,16 раза и потратит почти 30 баксов. Точность — до цента. Это не просто сбор данных, а их мощная аналитика. Бренды теперь не просто запоминают ваш заказ, они просчитывают …
Иногда полный бак не помогает, если внутри давно пусто Он приезжает на ночную заправку почти без топлива. Но очень быстро выясняется: проблема не в машине. Не в бензине. Не в дороге. Проблема в человеке, который уже много лет едет неизвестно куда и называет это нормальной жизнью. «Полный бак пустоты» — это история без сладких ответов и мотивационной чуши. Здесь не обещают, что после одного прозрения всё станет хоро…
Враги пытались задавить цифровым превосходством, но наша оборона сработала на ура Когда конкурент выпускает на тебя целый рой дронов — рекламных кампаний, — кажется, что отбоя нет. Но цифры в отчете — это еще не победа. Вчерашняя атака на Ярославскую область показала: даже 88 целей можно обнулить, если система ПВО — то есть твоя маркетинговая стратегия — выстроена правильно. Все эти дроны — как спамные рассылки и а…
В пункт возвратов принесли коробку без номера. Внутри оказался чёрно-белый кот, старая книга учёта и странная запись: «Причина возврата — не подошёл себе». Кот по имени Штрих ложится только на те вещи, которые люди возвращают по ложной причине. Платье «не подошло», потому что женщина испугалась снова почувствовать себя красивой. Микрофон оказался «некачественным», потому что мужчина не смог сказать сыну, что скучает…
Банки испугались Telegram Пока мы тут обсуждаем новые фичи мессенджера, для бизнеса назревает серьезная проблема. Дело Дурова создает мощный прецедент, после которого любая связь с Telegram начинает выглядеть в глазах регуляторов подозрительно. Финансовые организации первыми начнут отгребать риски. Платежи за рекламу или премиум-подписки могут внезапно заблокировать, назвав это "перестраховкой". Готовьтесь к тому, …
Сильная книга редко начинается со слова «всё» Книга выигрывает не от количества сказанного, а от точности маршрута. Внутри — способ отделить метод от биографии, пользу от самолюбования и главы от хороших, но лишних лекций. Читайте — там без литературного тумана.
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @marketolog_digital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@frilans_rabota_vakansii · 36,165#1
@effective_official · 44,118#2
@Knizhnaya_polka_marketologa · 35,390#3
@marketolog_marketing · 82,473#4
@Kultura_obuchenie · 51,265#5
@Prodavec_peregovory · 37,722#6
@profit_maker · 45,831#7
@kapital_amerika · 30,887#8
@marketerbest · 18,202#9
@startup_club24 · 76,673#10
@profi_kursi_gaidi · 94,372#11
@BigBrains · 63,897#12
@Energiya_molodost · 51,154#13
@Razvitie_sila_voli · 20,382#14
@marketing_s · 5,862#15
@ikyklovod · 70,004#16
@zapwork · 127,256#17
@Chitat_onlain_Biblioteka · 61,144#18
@russiancontentmarketing · 2,255#19
@iAmbitious · 126,262#20
@Karernii_serfer_karera · 32,868#21
@MarketingPloy · 69,863#22
@DELO_govorim · 68,513#23
@communication_department · 41,247#24
@marketpsy · 174,202#25
@stratmarketing · 18,248#26
@Sad_finansovoi_nezavisimosti · 32,700#27
@skillget · 81,097#28
@TrendMediaChannel · 8,303#29
@digest_cpa · 3,344#30
@worklis · 68,513#31
@procognitive · 1,881#32
@delaumoney · 53,334#33
@c_behavior · 8,894#34
@Pisatel_rasskazy · 89,238#35
@smmrus · 125,271#36
@TrafficTelega · 1,407#37
@nina_and_tg · 757#38
@creativepie · 1,976#39
@dnative · 81,416#40
@ikniga · 839,135#41
@emelianof · 907#42
@Elon_Musk_Tesla_Motors · 54,892#43
@gusarov_on_air · 290#44
@coaching_julia · 1,008#45
@Cena_uspeha · 57,540#46
@gilkoivglaz · 1,915#47
@podkasti_audioknigi · 84,641#48
@edu_goo · 8,649#49
@vladosmarketos · 845#50
@lyarosh_mgr · 1,134#51
@Perevod_s_bogatogo · 17,648#52
@zhukonator · 1,037#53
@ZhukovskyPro · 1,659#54
@TexterraBlog · 11,584#55
@petrochenkow · 47,331#56
@breakingtrends · 32,966#57
@davaizapuskai · 1,364#58
@marketingmemes · 2,553#59
@zvonok_com · 988#60
@eLama_russia · 16,459#61
@unisender · 3,278#62
@universitet20 · 17,197#63
@dr_aegorova · 329#64
@sosedi_beskudnikovo · 405#65
@zamyatin_ivan · 1,431#66
@holst_smmplanner · 17,348#67
@academy_sp · 1,157#68
@seletmerjenclub · 453#69
@bitinfol · 11,090#70
@hoolschool · 163#71
@pkgreenwood · 1,898#72
@VSEproDVIZH · 299 (as read 26 August 2026)#73
@lera_positive_insight · 231#74
@kirovskoe_SP · 449#75
@anex_moscow · 472#76
@d2dom_company · 2,524#77
@kleopatra24rus · 787#78
@chistystok · 453#79
@manfromsib · 7,380#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Knizhnaya_polka_marketologa · 35,390
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
@frilans_rabota_vakansii · 36,165
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
@Prodavec_peregovory · 37,722
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
@effective_official · 44,118
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
@Kultura_obuchenie · 51,265
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 August 2026
@Sad_finansovoi_nezavisimosti · 32,700
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 4 September 2026
@kapital_amerika · 30,887
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 6 September 2026
@startup_club24 · 76,673
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
@Elon_Musk_Tesla_Motors · 54,892
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 22 August 2026
@ikyklovod · 70,004
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@Pisatel_rasskazy · 89,238
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 17 August 2026
@marketolog_marketing · 82,473
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
@Energiya_molodost · 51,154
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
@worklis · 68,513
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 20 August 2026
@profi_kursi_gaidi · 94,372
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
@Karernii_serfer_karera · 32,868
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
@Chitat_onlain_Biblioteka · 61,144
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 August 2026
@BigBrains · 63,897
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
@communication_department · 41,247
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 August 2026
@skillget · 81,097
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
@Cena_uspeha · 57,540
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 23 August 2026
@work_finde · 87,466
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
@iAmbitious · 126,262
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
@DELO_govorim · 68,513
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Зубастый маркетолог” (@marketolog_digital), 49,078 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marketolog_digital.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.