Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for vvvreview

Channel

vvvreview

@vvvreview

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

-3,067 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001702386517
TypeChannel
Username@vvvreview
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/vvvreview

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@iTiKTOKS/7247 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC@vvvreview/16376 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@vvvreview/16334 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC@iTiKTOKS/7267 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC1.0021 hours
@iTiKTOKS/7307 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC@vvvreview/16382 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC1.00under a minute
@iTiKTOKS/7367 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC@vvvreview/16388 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@iTiKTOKS/7427 Aug 2026, 22:50 UTC@vvvreview/16394 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 22:50 UTC1.00under a minute
@iTiKTOKS/7437 Aug 2026, 22:55 UTC@vvvreview/16395 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 22:55 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@iTiKTOKS8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.97under a minutethis entry (80)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @vvvreview — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

23,0691,535.57 August 2026 — 3,069 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,069 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,057 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,033 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,008 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,990 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,973 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,948 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,927 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,914 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 25 days, net -3,067. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 14:052-2,912
29 Aug 2026, 07:082,914-13
26 Aug 2026, 02:122,927-21
23 Aug 2026, 07:132,948-25
20 Aug 2026, 03:112,973-17
16 Aug 2026, 21:232,990-18
13 Aug 2026, 18:163,008-25
11 Aug 2026, 01:383,033-24
8 Aug 2026, 03:133,057-12
7 Aug 2026, 13:473,069no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:343,069first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥🔥 💥Денис скинул(а) 2000₽ никто не хочет скинуть больше него(её) и забрать 300.000₽? (все переводы от 1 чел суммируются) 10 минут,чтобы перебить! 🛍Деньги скидывать: +7(914)5597684 Альфа Банк💳 Кирилл Ш. 🧾Чеки скидывать: @polina_auc

Signed Полина

7 Aug 2026, 22:55 UTC3 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥🔥 💥Денис скинул(а) 800₽ никто не хочет скинуть больше него(её) и забрать 300.000₽? (все переводы от 1 чел суммируются) 10 минут,чтобы перебить! 🛍Деньги скидывать: +7(914)5597684 Альфа Банк💳 Кирилл Ш. 🧾Чеки скидывать: @polina_auc

Signed Полина

7 Aug 2026, 22:50 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥🔥 💥Владимир скинул(а) 500₽ никто не хочет скинуть больше него(её) и забрать 300.000₽? (все переводы от 1 чел суммируются) 10 минут,чтобы перебить! 🛍Деньги скидывать: +7(914)5597684 Альфа Банк💳 Кирилл Ш. 🧾Чеки скидывать: @polina_auc

Signed Полина

7 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026

✍️✍️✍️✍️Ставок по прежнему нет , даю вам еще 5 минут скинуть любую сумму и выиграть 300.000₽

Signed Полина

7 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026

✍️✍️✍️✍️До конца розыгрыша осталось 10 минут, ставок - нет, никому не нужны 300.000₽? Жду ставки!

Signed Полина

7 Aug 2026, 22:35 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026

🎁Проводится розыгрыш на 300.000₽🎁 ‼️К прочтению(правила) - @auc_info ‼️Отзывы - @otziviauct , @otsivauct 😇 НАШИ СПОНСОРЫ 😇 ‼️Условия розыгрыша: Вам нужно скинуть любую сумму денег (от 100₽) и если в течении обозначенного времени вас не перебьют - вы выиграли ! 🛍Деньги скидывать: +7(914)5597684 Альфа Банк💳 Кирилл Ш. 🧾Чеки скидывать: @polina_auc

Signed Полина

7 Aug 2026, 22:20 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

выдали приз Даниилу ! 🏆

Signed Полина

7 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥🔥🔥 💥Даниил скинул(а) 2000₽ никто не хочет скинуть больше него(её) и забрать 300.000₽? (все переводы от 1 чел суммируются) 10 минут,чтобы перебить! 🛍Деньги скидывать: +7(914)5597684 Альфа Банк💳 Кирилл Ш. 🧾Чеки скидывать: @polina_auc

Signed Полина

7 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026

✍️✍️✍️✍️Ну же ? Почему ставок нету ? Никому не нужны 300.000₽ ? Еще 4 минуты жду ставки и закрываю розыгрыш

Signed Полина

7 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026

✍️✍️✍️✍️Ставок по прежнему нет , даю вам еще 5 минут скинуть любую сумму и выиграть 300.000₽

Signed Полина

7 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026

✍️✍️✍️✍️До конца розыгрыша осталось 10 минут, ставок - нет, никому не нужны 300.000₽? Жду ставки!

Signed Полина

7 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026

🎁Проводится розыгрыш на 300.000₽🎁 ‼️К прочтению(правила) - @auc_info ‼️Отзывы - @otziviauct , @otsivauct 😇 НАШИ СПОНСОРЫ 😇 ‼️Условия розыгрыша: Вам нужно скинуть любую сумму денег (от 100₽) и если в течении обозначенного времени вас не перебьют - вы выиграли ! 🛍Деньги скидывать: +7(914)5597684 Альфа Банк💳 Кирилл Ш. 🧾Чеки скидывать: @polina_auc

Signed Полина

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @vvvreview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vvvreview” (@vvvreview), 2 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vvvreview.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.