Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for вычислить по IP

Channel

вычислить по IP

@vychislit_po_IP

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,262subscribers

+282 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001286185595
TypeChannel
Username@vychislit_po_IP
DescriptionИнтеллектуальная собственность in a nutshell. Автор - Настя Сковпень Чат - @chat_vychisleniya @ip_QandA_bot - для связи, рекламы, вопросов и предложений Материалы канала не являются юридической консультацией и отражают мнение авторки 18+
Created13 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vychislit_po_IP

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,9736,2626,117.55 August 2026 — 5,980 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,980 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,973 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,976 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,111 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,133 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,150 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,151 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,154 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,159 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,173 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,183 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,181 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,179 subscribers1 October 2026 — 6,224 subscribers8 October 2026 — 6,243 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,240 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,238 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,255 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,261 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,259 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,258 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,261 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,262 subscribers5 August 20265 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net +282. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,930–6,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 07:496,262+1
1 Nov 2026, 20:466,261+3
29 Oct 2026, 10:066,258-1
26 Oct 2026, 01:286,259-2
23 Oct 2026, 00:076,261+6
20 Oct 2026, 01:206,255+17
17 Oct 2026, 02:196,238-2
13 Oct 2026, 20:386,240-3
8 Oct 2026, 06:426,243+19
1 Oct 2026, 15:156,224+45
16 Sept 2026, 05:406,179-2
12 Sept 2026, 07:586,181-2
8 Sept 2026, 13:376,183+10
3 Sept 2026, 02:546,173+14
30 Aug 2026, 16:436,159+5
27 Aug 2026, 21:076,154+3
24 Aug 2026, 17:186,151+1
21 Aug 2026, 03:336,150+17
17 Aug 2026, 20:596,133+22
15 Aug 2026, 06:366,111first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 6,262 subscribers
Avg views / post
782
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held49 (25 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total17,984
Reactions total552
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 14:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,990
Videos
≈101
Links
≈3,130

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,163 reactions across 48 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤43237.1%
🔥23320.0%
🦄16113.8%
👍1028.77%
❤‍🔥716.10%
😁665.67%
🌚272.32%
🤡121.03%
😱110.946%
👏100.86%
😨90.774%
🤔70.602%
🐳60.516%
🥰50.43%
💯40.344%
😐40.344%
🤣20.172%
😡10.086%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 49 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vychislit_po_IP. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 09:41 UTC400 views23 reactionsread 6 November 2026

А теперь перейдем от Моны Лизы к насущным вопросам: если вы искали курсы для повышения квалификации в IP (что лучше подарка в современном мире, чем не прекращающееся самообразование?) - этот пост для вас! Не всегда сложные ситуации требуют сложных решений (а простые - простых), и вопросы, которые задает вам бизнес или клиенты, далеко не редкость: как определить, что именно охраняется и у кого возникли права? Что мен…

🔥8❤6🦄6🥰3

5 Nov 2026, 08:57 UTC785 views21 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

Помните дело об изображениях «Мона Лиза с вином» и «Статуя Свободы с вином», в котором суд отказал дизайнеру в защите авторских прав? Теперь можно посмотреть мотивировку апелляции: Мосгорсуд отменил решение и частично удовлетворил иск. Истец требовал компенсацию за использование его работ на мерче. Он объяснял, что переработал приобретенные фотографии в Photoshop: заменил факел Статуи Свободы на стакан с вином, изм…

❤8🔥6🦄4👍3

4 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC594 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026

9-10 ноября WIPO проводит Global Forum, специально посвященный влиянию искусственного интеллекта на всю систему интеллектуальной собственности. Is the IP System Fit for the Age of AI? - нужно ли пересматривать фундаментальные основания интеллектуальной собственности в эпоху ИИ, баланс между стимулированием творчества, конкуренцией и доступом к знаниям. Authorship and Inventorship - авторство и изобретательство при …

❤6🔥4🦄3👍1

4 Nov 2026, 08:05 UTC565 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026
File

Сегодня прочитала вторую лекцию по ответственности за вред, причиняемый с использованием ИИ, и закончила в этой части цикл на интенсиве RPPA. Получилось насыщеннее, чем в первой лекции, поскольку мы помимо деликтов затронули контексты применения и ограничения договорной ответственности. При этом я особенно рада, что получилось разобрать деликтную теорию на примере недавнего иска, который подали родители погибшей из-…

❤8❤‍🔥5👍4🔥2😨1

4 Nov 2026, 08:05 UTC517 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026

У нас самые интеллектуальные и самые классные преподаватели интенсива. Цените (с)

❤‍🔥8❤4🔥4👍1🦄1

3 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC699 views22 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Если вы юрист и вам не задают вопросы про работников и ИИ, то вы находитесь в благостном информационном пузыре, не трогайте его. К обсуждению этой темы подходят с разных сторон, начиная от претензий к качеству работы, заканчивая передачей конфиденциальных данных, но зачастую реальный контекст упоминания и роли ИИ в спорах, которые доходят до суда, намного скромнее того, как подобные случаи описывают СМИ. В деле прог…

❤8🦄7🌚4🔥3

2 Nov 2026, 17:42 UTC779 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤11🔥2🥰2🦄2🐳1

1 Nov 2026, 16:42 UTC747 views29 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @law_in_fashionPhoto

31 млн рублей за дизайн сандалий: «Спортмастер» окончательно выиграл спор у Kari Суд по интеллектуальным правам оставил в силе судебные акты по делу № А40-41297/2025 (Спортмастер против Kari). Итог — компенсация около 31 млн рублей за неправомерное использование дизайна женских сандалий. Предметом спора стала модель, которая, по позиции «Спортмастера», воспроизводила дизайн их сандалий Demix Rio 3. «Спортмастер» …

❤12👍5🔥5🤡4🦄3

31 Oct 2026, 18:03 UTC690 views20 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Параллельно Международный кинологический союз «Парад Планет» и заводчик Мария Сунчелеева обратились в Санкт-Петербургское УФАС. Они утверждали, что регистрация товарных знаков использовалась Хейнонен не столько для индивидуализации собак конкретного питомника, сколько для ограничения деятельности других заводчиков. 19 февраля 2026 УФАС признало приобретение и использование товарных знаков «Прайтер» и «Praiter» в от…

❤9👍3🔥3🤔3🦄2

31 Oct 2026, 18:03 UTC548 views17 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Я бы, наверное, вообще не обратила внимания на это дело, если бы не наблюдала в соцсетях за одной собачкой, идентифицирующей себя как прайтер (aka «Пердюля»). Да и вообще вокруг меня собаки пород давно известных: алабай, такса, французский бульдог. А вот про прайтера я даже не знала. История породы начинается в Санкт-Петербурге. В 1990-х кинолог Ирина Хейнонен в питомнике «Пит Прайт» начала работу над новой породой…

❤9🔥3🤔3🦄2

30 Oct 2026, 18:43 UTC610 views24 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

А все видели как подкармливают нарратив нетизенов: ИИ для плебса - аналоговое искусство = люкс? Prada представила праздничную кампанию 2026 года - Drawing Prada: Animated by Hand. Руководить анимацией пригласили Джона Помероя - легендарного художника-аниматора, участвовавшего в создании «Покахонтас», «Земли до начала времен» и «Фантазии 2000». Кампания создавалась с помощью покадровой анимации, а свет на живых моде…

👍13❤4💯3🦄3🔥1

30 Oct 2026, 18:25 UTC775 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026

28 октября 2026 губернатор штата Нью-Йорк подписала закон, ограничивающий небезопасные функции ИИ-компаньонов при взаимодействии с несовершеннолетними, закон вступит в силу 1 января 2027, но уже сейчас ясно, что ИИ сервисы должны будут критически посмотреть на то, как они "выстраивают диалог" с пользователем. Основная идея закона снизить вероятность привязанности и манипуляций зависимым положением несовершеннолетнег…

❤7🔥3🌚2🐳2🦄2🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @vychislit_po_IP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА IP и IT
@sudpraktik_IPIT_demo · 22,994
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Клуб правообладателей
@bchlaw · 27,128
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
ФАС России | FAS Russia
@fasrussia · 33,633
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Юридические вакансии
@legal_jobs · 36,215
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Loader from SVO
@loaderfromSVO · 40,411
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Privacy Advocates
@prv_adv · 21,859
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
ilovedocs
@ilovedocs · 19,320
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
РУЛЬФЫ, ИЛЬФЫ И ИНХАУСЫ
@LawFirms · 21,672
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
Private Law Library | PLL Право
@privlawlib · 34,312
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Право.ru
@pravo_pravo · 57,918
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Поворот на Право
@povorotnapravo · 50,641
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Доктор Права
@doktorprava · 20,843
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“вычислить по IP” (@vychislit_po_IP), 6,262 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vychislit_po_IP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.