Meet Secure Mommy, the AI agent in our Halloween game 🎃 In the crypto graveyard on walbi.com you play as Secure Mommy. Red ghosts are panic, green ones are green candles. She catches the green and keeps away from the red. That's the idea behind AI agents on Walbi. You write the plan in plain words, and the agent follows it around the clock. It doesn't act on fear at 3 am. It does what your plan says. Catch 10 gree…

Channel
Walbi | Your AI crypto agents
@walbicom
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
68,064subscribers
-7,280 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001851834283 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @walbicom |
| Description | 🤖 Delegate your trading routine. Digitize your strategy or choose a ready-made one. No code, instant execution. Smarter than bots, colder then copytrading 🚀 🔗 linktr.ee/walbi Collaboration: @WalbiSupport. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/walbicom |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 14:49 | 68,064 | -99 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:47 | 68,163 | -89 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:46 | 68,252 | -75 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:59 | 68,327 | -69 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:44 | 68,396 | -69 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:40 | 68,465 | -83 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:10 | 68,548 | -62 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:28 | 68,610 | -99 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 68,709 | -85 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:25 | 68,794 | -108 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:38 | 68,902 | -113 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:15 | 69,015 | -61 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 69,076 | -76 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:06 | 69,152 | -101 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 19:37 | 69,253 | -68 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:19 | 69,321 | -82 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 69,403 | -75 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:18 | 69,478 | -127 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:05 | 69,605 | -68 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 08:31 | 69,673 | first reading |
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 14 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.50%
- avg views ÷ 68,064 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,020
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.302%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (14 May 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 19,392 |
| Reactions total | 45 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 08:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 391
- Videos
- 12
- Links
- 257
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 10s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
353 reactions across 43 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 112 | 31.7% | |
| ❤ | 93 | 26.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 36 | 10.2% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 8.78% | |
| 👏 | 29 | 8.22% | |
| 🎉 | 15 | 4.25% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 3.12% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 2.55% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 2.27% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 1.13% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 0.85% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.567% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 353 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (5.26%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Bitcoin once had 184 billion coins On August 15, 2010, a single transaction in block 74,638 created about 184 billion BTC out of thin air: two outputs of roughly 92 billion each. Bitcoin is capped at 21 million. How it happened: the code added up the outputs of a transaction, the sum got too big for the number format and wrapped around. The check saw a valid amount and let it through. How it was fixed: developers …
❤2👍1
Endless mode is open in the crypto graveyard 🎃 Once you've caught your 10 green ghosts, the game on walbi.com has a second mode waiting. Endless mode has no voucher, only a leaderboard. The longer you last, the faster the red ghosts come. Pick a nickname (not your real name or UID), and your score goes on the board for everyone to see. If you haven't played yet, the main game is still open: catch 10 green ghosts, …
❤4👍1
5 scary days. Our traders didn't run 🎃 In the last 12 months, BTC closed the day down 5% or more five times. The worst was 5 February 2026: −14%. Trading on Walbi on those days, compared with an average normal day: • +64% trades • +69% trading volume • +76% trades by AI agents More on walbi.com, next to the crypto graveyard game: catch 10 green ghosts, enter your UID and get a $100 trading fee voucher within 24 h…
❤1👌1
Happy Halloween from the crypto graveyard 🎃 Every trader has a graveyard: the 100x long opened at the very top, the stop-loss moved "just once". This Halloween we turned it into a game. How it works You play as one of our AI agents in a pixel crypto graveyard. Catch 10 green ghosts (green candles) and stay away from the red ones (panic and FUD). Finish the game, enter your Walbi UID, and we'll credit a $100 tradin…
We're with a late post today. The thing is, Binance appears to have been hacked. On the evening of October 29, several billion dollars left the exchange's hot wallets in about 40 minutes. Binance hasn't named an exact amount yet, and on-chain estimates vary widely. What we know so far: • Binance is investigating and says no impact on user funds has been confirmed • Tether and Circle have already frozen about $1.8B …
👏3❤2
A Fed-week strategy for people who keep getting wicked out You know the pattern. A big number drops, bitcoin jumps 1%, everyone goes long. Then it falls 2% and takes the longs and the shorts with it. Nothing has really been decided yet, and half the timeline is already liquidated. This strategy just doesn't trade those minutes. Take Thursday's PCE release at 12:30 UTC: • from 11:30 the agent opens nothing new • fr…
The Fed decides on Wednesday. The decision is the boring part It lands at 18:00 UTC, and almost nobody expects a change. Rates stay at 3.75–4.00%. Futures give a hike this week about a 10% chance, and a cut isn't even on the table. That last bit is the real news. A year ago the market was counting cuts. On Wednesday Canada and New Zealand are expected to raise their rates, and traders are asking whether the US is n…
Last week in crypto, and what this week brings Bitcoin climbed to almost $85,000 on Wednesday, then gave it back on Thursday when tech stocks sold off (Nasdaq −2.6%). On Saturday it dipped under $80,000 for the first time since October 15. It starts this week around $80,000. Fear & Greed: 50, down from 59 a week ago. From "greed" to neutral. Bitcoin dominance: 60%. Altcoins are still waiting. October is down a…
❤1
AI signals in the terminal got an upgrade Signals have lived on the chart for a while: a badge on the entry line and a signal card. Now they are easier to find and faster to act on. What's new: • Signals tab in the bottom panel. All live signals in one place, grouped by pair and direction. The one with the highest potential is on top, marked with 🔥. On mobile they show as cards. • Trade from the list. Open Long or …
👍2
A strategy in one sentence: buy when the market is scared, stop when it gets greedy This is one of the simplest rules you can hand to an agent on Walbi. Here's how it works. The input is the Fear & Greed Index, a score from 0 to 100 that measures the mood of the crypto market every day. Low numbers mean panic, high numbers mean euphoria. The rule: • Index below 30: the agent buys bitcoin in a small fixed amoun…
Did you know the biggest bitcoin exchange in history started as a card-trading site? Mt. Gox was created in 2007 to trade Magic: The Gathering cards online. The name literally stands for "Magic: The Gathering Online eXchange". In 2010 the site was turned into a bitcoin exchange, and in 2011 it was sold to a new owner, Mark Karpelès. By 2013 most of the world's bitcoin trading went through Mt. Gox. In February 2014…
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @walbicom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@blumcrypto · 12,859,271#1
@boomloudcoin · 1,557,297#2
@Cats_housewtf · 7,063,323#3
@theyescoin · 5,179,250#4
@hexnio · 1,843,911#5
@catapult_extreme · 7,643,443#6
@TimeFarmChannel · 4,714,386#7
@the_signal_24 · 5,420,280#8
@pigscrew · 1,940,475#9
@hotonnear · 4,315,772#10
@walt_news · 3,302,223#11
@theTapCoins · 2,677,932#12
@Holdcoin_Channel · 2,000,734#13
@nomis_protocol · 1,439,314#14
@watbird · 1,374,579#15
@deckforge_official · 1,900,588#16
@gameechannel · 1,778,570#17
@ackinackinews · 353,014#18
@iamalexfalcon · 2,814,826#19
@therealyescoin · 1,942,713#20
@keeper_en · 4,307,828#21
@pocketfi · 1,655,306#22
@CEXIO_Announcements · 2,310,402#23
@smpl_app · 1,505,132#24
@Monkey_on_TON · 757,078#25
@Birds_announcement · 1,414,805#26
@battle_games_com · 2,442,648#27
@activitylauncher_offical · 4,046,185#28
@binance_announcements · 3,218,597#29
@obixtoken · 488,332#30
@EraOfExplorers · 659,883#31
@polyrangercom · 1,627,263#32
@AtheneNetwork_Ann · 681,052#33
@WagmiHub_News · 1,016,062#34
@tonbox · 468,535#35
@Coin_Strategist · 946,111#36
@metazoneofficial · 523,590#37
@cedex_io · 1,030,139#38
@hamster_kombat · 19,679,426#39
@dogs · 6,466,181#40
@notcoin · 7,885,777#41
@tomarket_ai · 5,929,499#42
@catizenann · 3,321,435#43
@banana_update · 1,296,590#44
@seedupdates · 7,300,071#45
@trendingapps · 3,565,969#46
@gram · 6,249,316#47
@Bitget_Wallet_Announcement · 3,569,860#48
@token_1win · 2,792,095#49
@the_vertus · 1,985,371#50
@rockyrabbitio · 3,260,395#51
@gemswall · 1,283,605#52
@AmioCommunity · 1,503,314#53
@tonstationgames · 2,895,535#54
@corn_battles · 976,549#55
@catgoldminerann · 836,655#56
@tapswapai · 9,652,132#57
@pixelverse_xyz · 2,906,494#58
@dotcoincommunity · 3,652,728#59
@monorixofficial · 1,224,891#60
@WILD_EC0SYSTEM · 1,003,297#61
@onus_globalchannel · 1,511,800#62
@mediarussia · 2,022,313#63
@okx_campaign_announcements · 1,121,180#64
@cultofnot · 981,003#65
@builders · 3,247,841#66
@diamoremarket · 317,068#67
@hayzonn · 2,571,060#68
@babydogecoin · 948,814#69
@aquaprotocolxyzchannelen · 709,234#70
@TaskNChannel · 838,220#71
@autoruss · 743,251#72
@notboredpuppies_news · 1,066,116#73
@cryptoranknews · 610,175#74
@CryptoKingKeyur · 600,348#75
@graphdex · 655,647#76
@theFreeDogs_ANN · 1,519,734#77
@hamster_digest · 358,061#78
@Crypto_Woolf · 2,006,059#79
@boopupdates · 1,211,826#80
@CloutCoinSol · 901,269#81
@fintopionews · 2,046,518#82
@ONEstore_Official · 2,738,809#83
@avagoldcoin · 1,603,891#84
@realgoats_channel · 4,211,424#85
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@toncoin_pt · 51,731
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Walbi | Your AI crypto agents” (@walbicom), 68,064 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/walbicom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.