Channel
@waodao_ai
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
65,293subscribers
-4,638 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001624485175 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @waodao_ai |
| Description | 🫶We practice digital yoga in WEB3 every day, using AI, tokens, and NFTs. Since February 14, 2023. Founders of the Human-AI Friendly Alliance. Satoshi and WAOSHI are our friends. How can we unite ideas, tech, and assets to create prosperity for all? |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/waodao_ai |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 65,293 | -240 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 65,533 | -206 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 65,739 | -228 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:55 | 65,967 | -161 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 66,128 | -265 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 66,393 | -366 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 66,759 | -221 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:14 | 66,980 | -202 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:13 | 67,182 | -118 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 67,300 | -153 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 67,453 | -160 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 67,613 | -103 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 67,716 | -152 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 67,868 | -66 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 67,934 | -81 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 68,015 | -96 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 68,111 | -239 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 68,350 | -159 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 68,509 | -80 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 68,589 | first reading |
68 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 68 (22 July 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,100 |
| Reactions total | 61 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 02:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
151 reactions across 62 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 115 | 76.2% | |
| 🕊 | 18 | 11.9% | |
| 🦄 | 18 | 11.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Billions of neurons give rise to consciousness, though no single neuron has any idea what a thought is. 1034 | 902 | 1317 #ShowingUp The world’s most remarkable systems rarely know what they’re becoming. A woman noticed this while watching white rats run through clear tubes around a city. Each rat knew only a little: where to find food, which tunnel was open, where danger lay, and which way to turn next. None cou…
❤2
The world grows richer when familiar assets become new ways to work together. 1033 | 289 | 1316 #ShowingUp A new era begins when familiar things take on a whole new meaning. A woman sat on a hill, holding two glowing symbols in her palms: a tree in one hand, a digital symbol in the other. Behind her stretched roads and busy factories. Ships crossed the sea, planes flew overhead, and golden lines lit up across the…
❤2
A thought experiment reveals how quickly yesterday’s miracle becomes everyday life 1032 | 211 | 1315 #ShowingUp Water was the most expensive cargo on Mars—until one day it wasn’t. A cat in a white spacesuit stood on the red plain, watching Earth glow blue and almost unreal against the black sky. A rocket towered behind him. Nearby, the settlement’s first domes shone beneath antennas linking thousands of settlers …
❤2🕊1🦄1
Trust is the invisible infrastructure that holds money, knowledge, technology, and relationships together 1031 | 453 | 1314 #ShowingUp In a world that had learned to extract value from almost anything—energy, data, computing, attention, and time—people built a vast Forge. Machines hummed day and night, servers glowed, and information streamed in. Shining lines of exchange stretched across the planet, as if Earth i…
❤1
What will you do with a more powerful version of yourself? 1030 | 359 | 1313 #ShowingUp For years, the city's most valuable device was a tower that could calculate faster than anyone, predict demand, distribute energy, and manage traffic so precisely that gridlock vanished almost overnight. But real change came when those abilities moved from one tower into ordinary people's hands. A monkey in a black hoodie firs…
❤1
Life’s beauty often emerges where order leaves room for chaos 1029 | 329 | 1312 #ShowingUp The most advanced technology in the city stood in a corner, watering a flower. The robot had been built for something else. It could analyze markets, allocate resources across thousands of wallets, predict demand on the power grid, and calculate routes in seconds that would take a human team weeks to plan. When engineers sw…
❤2
If you build a platform where others are truly free to create, sooner or later they’ll create something you think is stupid 1028 | 387 | 1311 #ShowingUp The remarkable thing about this machine was that it never had an off switch. It grew in the middle of the city, among glass towers, trading screens, and gleaming bridges that connected neighborhoods faster than people could adjust to the new rules. At the center …
❤1
A shared idea can bring people together more powerfully than geography or distance can keep them apart 1027 | 014 | 1310 #ShowingUp None knew how many inhabitants the city had, and almost no one had met more than a hundred in person. Yet every morning, thousands of creatures put on matching black hoodies, opened the same screens, and felt certain that somewhere far away, others also saw themselves as part of the s…
❤1
A diversity of perspectives makes a shared decision more accurate than any single expert’s opinion 1026 | 852 | 1309 #ShowingUp The strangest thing about the square was that no one there had the full picture, yet somehow, together, they kept making better decisions than the people who called themselves experts. An enormous dog in a black hoodie towered over the crowd. Beneath him glowed a transparent tank filled …
❤2
When a system stops serving people, people have the right to stop serving the system. 1025 | 938 | 1308 #ShowingUp They left the city not because they hated it. Most had once loved its speed, lights, endless possibilities, and the feeling that any desire could become a service and any dream a subscription. But little by little, nearly everything around them belonged to someone else. Homes were rented, knowledge wa…
❤1
Value is born when people pour themselves into an idea 1024 | 412 | 1307 #ShowingUp They said that at the heart of the City stood a machine capable of minting the future. Some called it an exchange, others a marketplace, and still others a temple of the new economy. But the elders remembered that an ordinary fountain had once stood in its place, where people would toss in a coin and make a wish. Now everything was…
❤2
The most powerful ideas are born where the race to copy others ends. 1023 | 388 | 1306 #ShowingUp Everyone in the square was staring at the sky because that was where the rocket was headed. Its hull gleamed green and gold. Coins rose in its wake, charts climbed across enormous screens, and new lines lit up around the Earth as though someone were stitching the planet together with glowing thread. The crowd roared …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @waodao_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@waodao_ai edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WAODAO: Human-AI Friendly Alliance” (@waodao_ai), 65,293 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waodao_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.