Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Вотерфорточка

Channel

Вотерфорточка

@waterforkFM

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

57,834subscribers

-1,539 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001299942054
TypeChannel
Username@waterforkFM
Created10 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 October 2026
Measurements held45
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/waterforkFM

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

57,83459,37358,603.56 August 2026 — 59,373 subscribers6 August 2026 — 59,357 subscribers7 August 2026 — 59,315 subscribers8 August 2026 — 59,290 subscribers9 August 2026 — 59,272 subscribers10 August 2026 — 59,255 subscribers11 August 2026 — 59,225 subscribers12 August 2026 — 59,213 subscribers13 August 2026 — 59,166 subscribers15 August 2026 — 59,113 subscribers16 August 2026 — 59,058 subscribers17 August 2026 — 59,030 subscribers18 August 2026 — 59,005 subscribers19 August 2026 — 58,972 subscribers20 August 2026 — 58,925 subscribers21 August 2026 — 58,929 subscribers23 August 2026 — 58,931 subscribers25 August 2026 — 58,927 subscribers25 August 2026 — 58,874 subscribers27 August 2026 — 58,841 subscribers27 August 2026 — 58,858 subscribers28 August 2026 — 58,846 subscribers29 August 2026 — 58,822 subscribers31 August 2026 — 58,811 subscribers1 September 2026 — 58,781 subscribers2 September 2026 — 58,759 subscribers3 September 2026 — 58,730 subscribers4 September 2026 — 58,728 subscribers8 September 2026 — 58,701 subscribers11 September 2026 — 58,619 subscribers13 September 2026 — 58,578 subscribers14 September 2026 — 58,546 subscribers16 September 2026 — 58,584 subscribers18 September 2026 — 58,606 subscribers1 October 2026 — 58,238 subscribers6 October 2026 — 58,038 subscribers10 October 2026 — 58,008 subscribers13 October 2026 — 57,920 subscribers15 October 2026 — 57,885 subscribers17 October 2026 — 57,887 subscribers18 October 2026 — 57,890 subscribers19 October 2026 — 57,874 subscribers20 October 2026 — 57,865 subscribers21 October 2026 — 57,848 subscribers22 October 2026 — 57,834 subscribers6 August 202622 October 2026
45 measurements spanning 77 days, net -1,539. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57,603–59,604 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 45
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Oct 2026, 15:1657,834-14
21 Oct 2026, 06:5957,848-17
20 Oct 2026, 06:3957,865-9
19 Oct 2026, 04:5057,874-16
18 Oct 2026, 08:1757,890+3
17 Oct 2026, 05:2757,887+2
15 Oct 2026, 04:0757,885-35
13 Oct 2026, 22:0957,920-88
10 Oct 2026, 11:5658,008-30
6 Oct 2026, 10:1658,038-200
1 Oct 2026, 07:3758,238-368
18 Sept 2026, 12:0158,606+22
16 Sept 2026, 02:5558,584+38
14 Sept 2026, 11:5958,546-32
13 Sept 2026, 01:0158,578-41
11 Sept 2026, 01:5758,619-82
8 Sept 2026, 01:5658,701-27
4 Sept 2026, 21:4258,728-2
3 Sept 2026, 06:0758,730-29
2 Sept 2026, 01:3558,759first reading

Engagement

277 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 155 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 57,834 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,560
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
96
of 277 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held277 (2 August 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total718,400
Reactions total54,040
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Oct 2026, 08:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 45s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

165,018 reactions across 276 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 522654650566130626172,41743.9%
❤‍🔥30,65618.6%
🤣24,82415.0%
custom 542929803896109555312,2387.42%
🔥8,5855.20%
😢3,1631.92%
👍2,4201.47%
😭2,3101.40%
🥰1,3730.832%
⚡9870.598%
🤯9780.593%
👀9560.579%
😍8710.528%
🌚6880.417%
💔6250.379%
👏4410.267%
🗿2950.179%
🐳1930.117%
🕊1800.109%
💅1700.103%
13 further kinds6480.393%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 276 of the 277 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165,018 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 277 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
38
across the posts below
Posts paid on
25
of 276 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @waterforkFM. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 277 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 21 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Oct 2026, 16:31 UTC≈2,810 views221 reactionsread 22 October 2026

https://youtu.be/OGnDljE4R2g?is=efugQdMOsbrfkuJJ Песня, об официальном релизе которой я мечтаю уже много лет

❤‍🔥147custom 522654650566130626127🔥20🤣18🌚5👍3custom 54292980389610955531

20 Oct 2026, 19:28 UTC≈5,440 views1,202 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

С днём охрененного заката

custom 5226546505661306261801❤‍🔥257custom 542929803896109555386🔥45👍10🌚3

20 Oct 2026, 16:48 UTC≈5,620 views455 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5226546505661306261269🤣128👀31🔥13❤‍🔥10custom 54292980389610955533🤮1

20 Oct 2026, 14:22 UTC≈5,800 views575 reactionsread 22 October 2026

Хотя с другой стороны чего удивляться Вполне нормально для 42 лет

🔥322🤣177custom 522654650566130626152❤‍🔥11custom 542929803896109555310👍2⚡1

19 Oct 2026, 18:07 UTC≈6,650 views1,062 reactions1 Starread 22 October 2026
Video

Старею

❤‍🔥557🤣375custom 522654650566130626170👍18😭18custom 542929803896109555313🔥11

15 Oct 2026, 19:56 UTC≈10,300 views1,047 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Следующий уровень:

🤣809custom 5226546505661306261144❤‍🔥63🌚10custom 542929803896109555310😍7⚡4

15 Oct 2026, 15:48 UTC≈9,130 views1,166 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Photo

Не знаете как сфоткаться - берете и повторяете любую фотографию Уильяма Дефо! Успех гарантирован

custom 5226546505661306261710🤣299❤‍🔥112👍24🔥12custom 54292980389610955539

15 Oct 2026, 14:30 UTC≈8,710 views787 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Video

Здание из Шрека в Коппенгагене

custom 5226546505661306261471❤‍🔥128🤣126🔥38👍11custom 542929803896109555310🐳3

15 Oct 2026, 10:40 UTC≈7,330 views426 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5226546505661306261230🤣110🔥43❤‍🔥19👀14custom 54292980389610955537👍3

15 Oct 2026, 10:30 UTC≈7,260 views337 reactionsread 22 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5226546505661306261211🤣87❤‍🔥17custom 542929803896109555315🔥5👍2

14 Oct 2026, 20:10 UTC≈8,090 views376 reactionsread 22 October 2026

Знаменитый, да Сразу за Красногорском

custom 5226546505661306261318❤‍🔥40🥰14custom 54292980389610955533🤣1

14 Oct 2026, 20:10 UTC≈8,360 views357 reactionsread 22 October 2026

Это Уткогорск?)

custom 5226546505661306261289❤‍🔥36🤣15🌚14custom 54292980389610955533

Showing the 12 most recent of 277 posts we hold for @waterforkFM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Oct 2026, 15:30 UTCAnonymous Poll1,220 voters approx.

Там всего одна сценка отличается, но какой вариант всё-таки лучше?

  1. 1 (объясните почему)65%
  2. 2 (объясните почему)35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Oct 2026, 18:20 UTCAnonymous Poll2,430 voters approx.

Знали?

  1. Знали20%
  2. Не знали80%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTCAnonymous Poll3,450 voters approx.

Кофемолка кофе

  1. Мелет41%
  2. Молет28%
  3. Молит8%
  4. УМОЛЯЕТ АХАХА23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 277 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 21 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Роман Котков
@kotkofff · 10,158
#1
ШАСТУН
@shastoonchannel · 231,491
#2
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,394,045
#3
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,105,337
#4
Арсений
@arsdvatri · 171,178
#5
ИМПРОВИЗАТОРЫ
@theimprovisatorsshow · 236,645
#6
здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,093,852
#7
персик
@anthonyuly · 233,668
#8
СЕРГЕЙ МАТВИЕНКО
@yamamatvienko · 143,942
#9
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 731,116
#10
Kate_Pozova
@kate_pozova · 38,971
#11
ЭТО ЗНАК
@etoznakmag · 633,485
#12
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 3,963,564
#13
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,640,701
#14
BUBBLE Studios
@grom_film · 51,089
#15
Clapp Snap!
@KateClappTelegram · 170,866
#16
KOSTI
@kosti · 556,709
#17
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 190,888
#18
Elena Raytman
@elenaraytman · 834,620
#19
Душниловка
@dusnilaparty · 109,220
#20
АНЯ POKROV🥑
@pokrov90avocado · 246,635
#21
шпили-ванили
@spilivanili · 18,184
#22
Oleg Trofim | official
@olenjon_official · 16,173
#23
kiraderen 🍂
@kira_de_ren · 2,037
#24
Семейное шоу
@familyshowchannel · 44,633
#25
Клуб Романтики — Мои Истории
@official_romanceclub · 733,765
#26
Фикбук
@ficbook_official · 292,062
#27
Просто Чума 🕸️
@foxyfowl · 2,278
#28
СКЕТЧУП
@sketchup_parfenyuk · 127,596
#29
ЭМИЛЬ И ЕГО СЕМЬЯ
@emiltelegramm · 142,443
#30
МОТИВАТОРЫ!
@themotivatorsofficial · 18,804
#31
Джарахов Эльдар Казанфарович крутой рэпер офигенный тиктокер и вообще очень талантливый человек
@dzharakhov1 · 95,634
#32
Utopia Show
@topapopa · 365,298
#33
Комиксы BUBBLE
@bubble_comics · 41,597
#34
Жидковские посиделки
@zhidkovskiy_talk · 575,982
#35
ЖАБА — медиа-болото
@zhabqua · 107,976
#36
Минские кoты
@improvminskfd · 4,605
#37
Глеб три дня дождя
@everydayrain · 235,815
#38
ЕГОР ШКРЕД
@egorikvtg · 684,241
#39
та дебилка с кучей концертов
@imperfectph · 2,180
#40
Сергей Шевелев
@sheveleu · 8,319
#41
Никита Сударь ТГК
@sudarchnl · 63,201
#42
Кошачья удача
@with_catluckk · 1,448
#43
🎀Karna.val🎀
@karnava1l · 281,520
#44
ДВИЖ
@improvdvij · 20,276
#45
каррамбеби
@karrambamby · 178,440
#46
ZAVIDOVA
@zavidushkimoi · 154,254
#47
Pozov Live
@pozov · 252,431
#48
Файлы Журавля Дима Журавлёв
@files_zhuravlya · 178,920
#49
Аня Ищук
@anyaischukkkk · 611,210
#50
КК
@petrovtel · 545,526
#51
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 908,738
#52
CHEBOTAREV
@chebotarevlife · 29,199
#53
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 926,308
#54
Лепёшка (Сергей Горошко)
@lepeshkaskapustoi · 24,286
#55
Stray Kids | JYP ️️
@StrayKids_JYP · 163,063
#56
Alexandra Trusova
@avtrusovaofficial · 237,992
#57
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 329,675
#58
ELEVATE
@elevate_team · 46,312
#59
олежка
@singantoleg · 27,416
#60
Дом Знаменитостей
@thehouseofcelebs · 99,574
#61
Сергей Лазарев
@lazarev_official · 142,801
#62

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Akmal’
@akmaltgshkaaaa · 77,659
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 September 2026
Gufee Medalin
@gufeemed · 48,868
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Вотерфорточка” (@waterforkFM), 57,834 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waterforkFM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.