Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ULUL ALBAB - The People of Intellect

Channel

ULUL ALBAB - The People of Intellect

@weareululalbab

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,482subscribers

+1,088 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001249113964
TypeChannel
Username@weareululalbab
Created23 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/weareululalbab

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,39414,50013,94714,4826 August 20268 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 94 days, net +1,088. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,228–14,666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 19:4714,482-17
7 Nov 2026, 13:2914,499-1
6 Nov 2026, 16:2014,500+5
5 Nov 2026, 19:2914,495+1
4 Nov 2026, 16:1714,494+1
3 Nov 2026, 17:1614,493+8
2 Nov 2026, 18:2414,485+28
1 Nov 2026, 15:1714,457+13
31 Oct 2026, 16:3514,444+5
30 Oct 2026, 17:5614,439+7
29 Oct 2026, 19:4014,432+86
28 Oct 2026, 22:3014,346+37
27 Oct 2026, 23:0814,309+26
26 Oct 2026, 20:1514,283+24
25 Oct 2026, 20:0814,259-10
24 Oct 2026, 22:2914,269-2
23 Oct 2026, 22:3014,271+23
22 Oct 2026, 23:4114,248+27
21 Oct 2026, 18:5914,221+24
20 Oct 2026, 16:5914,197first reading

Engagement

71 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
67.8%
avg views ÷ 14,482 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,820
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 71 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held71 (17 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total255,400
Reactions total12,997
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 18:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

32,641 reactions across 71 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
⚡13,45641.2%
custom 594526570590870384111,98936.7%
😢7,19622.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,641 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (26.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 14:13 UTC≈2,600 views313 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#deep_afkaar #tafakkur © ULUL ALBAB yozdi

custom 5945265705908703841158😢95⚡60

7 Nov 2026, 05:47 UTC≈4,530 views507 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Alloh bandaga yaxshilikni xohlasa, uni o'zi(ning kamchiligi) bilan mashg'ul qilib qo'yadi. O'zi bilan ovora inson: - o'zini sarhisob qiladi; - aybini qidiradi va topadi; - mas'uliyatli bo'ladi; - johillik va takabburlik qilmaydi; - qalb va nafsini poklaydi; - kamchiliklaridan tez xalos bo'ladi; - iymon halovatini topadi; - doim o'sadi-rivojlanadi; - oxiratini o'ylaydi; - munosabatlari yaxshilanadi; - odamlarni tushun…

custom 5945265705908703841274⚡148😢85

6 Nov 2026, 05:10 UTC≈4,930 views455 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#kuzatuv Hamma narsani ham oson o'rganolmaymiz. Hamma narsani ham oson o'rgatolmaymiz. Chunki ba'zi narsalar san'at bo'ladi, ilm-fan emas. Ba'zi insonlar (solihlar) ham san'at asari bo'ladi, ma'lumot bazasi emas. Ulardan nusxa olish qiyin, ularga o'xshash qiyin. Fikrlash - ilm; teran fikrlash - san'at. Yodlash - bilim; uqib olish - san'at. Muomalani o'rganish - ko'nikma; qalbdan muhabbat - san'at. Bu san'atni ehs…

⚡255custom 5945265705908703841136😢64

5 Nov 2026, 06:08 UTC≈6,970 views496 reactionsread 8 November 2026

#foyda #tajriba ليس في الإمكان أفضل مما كان Bo'lgan ishning eng yaxshisi bo'lgan. Bo'layotgan ishning eng yaxshisi bo'lmoqda. Bo'ladigan ishning eng yaxshisi bo'ladi. Undan ham yaxshisi bo'lishi mumkinmas. Undan ham xayrli holatda bo'lishing mumkinmas. Sen uchun hozir turgan holatingdan ham yaxshiroq holat uchun yo'q. Sen uchun hozir turgan joyingdan ham yaxshiroq makon yo'q. Tushun va tashvish qilma. Yaxshi - "…

⚡258custom 5945265705908703841160😢78

4 Nov 2026, 04:45 UTC≈6,600 views372 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#eynafs, faqat zohirni bilasan. Senga nima ko'rsatilsa, shunga ishonasan. Yo'q narsasini bordek ko'rsatsa, ishonasan Bor narsasini yo'qdek ko'rsatsa, ishonasan. Muammolari bo'lib, gapirmasa, muammosi yo'g'akan, deysan. Muammosi yo'q bo'lib, gapirsa, vahima qilib, e'tibor tortmoqchi, deysan. Ko'rgani-yu eshitganigagina ishonib, parda ortini bilolmaydigan birisan. Shunday ekan, nimaga endi o'zingga aloqasi bo'lmagan …

😢199custom 5945265705908703841103⚡70

3 Nov 2026, 06:02 UTC≈6,900 views384 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Kasb tanlashda ahamiyat berilishi kerak: #tajriba - Bu ishda Allohning roziligi bormi? - Bu ish halolmi, nojoiz emasmi? - Bu ish zulmdan xolimi? - Bu ish orqali odamlarga foyda keltiramanmi? - Bu ish o'z dunyo-oxiratimga foydalimi? - Bu ish ibodatimdan to'smaydimi? (qiyinchilik bo'lishi mumkin lekin to'siq bo'lmasligi kerak) - Bu ishni uddalash uchun bilim bormi/ololamanmi? - Bu ishni haqiqatda eng go'zal tarzda b…

⚡199custom 5945265705908703841116😢69

2 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC≈7,750 views501 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Qo'rquv: Ijtimoiy tarmoqqa kirmasam, yangiliklardan qolib ketaman. Qadriyat: Ichki xotirjamlik va diqqatimni buzmaslik uchun ma'lum muddat kirmayman. Qo'rquv: Hamma narsaga ruxsat bersak, bizdan foydalanishadi. Qadriyat: Nima to'g'ri, nima noto'g'riligini o'rgatsak, biz odamlarni, odamlar bizni hurmat qilishadi. Qo'rquv: Bolam hech kimdan kam bo'lmay o'ssin. Qadriyat: Bolam yetim va muhtojlarni his qilsin. Inson qa…

⚡234custom 5945265705908703841173😢94

1 Nov 2026, 05:30 UTC≈9,580 views635 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

O's, rivojlan, yur, safar qil, aralash, gaplash, ishla, o'qi, yasha - lekin asliyatingni unutma. O'zliging, qadriyatingdan voz kechish evaziga yuksalma, tubanlashma ham. Istasang, "Puankare"ni o'qi. © ULUL ALBAB yozdi

⚡341custom 5945265705908703841195😢99

31 Oct 2026, 06:50 UTC≈8,670 views363 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Kitob bilan muomaladagi yozilmagan odoblar: #tajriba Kitobni ocharkan niyatni yangilab, ilm duolarini qilish. Muallif (tarjimon, shorih,..lar)ni duo qilish. Kitobni odob bilan varaqlash. Kitob varaqlarini buklamaslik. Xatcho'p va stikerlardan foydalanish. Kitob ustiga "yeb-ichar" qo'ymaslik. Yog', shira, kir qo'llar bilan ushlamaslik.  O'ta noziklari: Kitob kimnikiligiga qarab ulug'lanadi - Allohning kitobi doim…

⚡192custom 5945265705908703841122😢49

30 Oct 2026, 05:35 UTC≈9,440 views471 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Eng qisqa yo'l #kuzatuv O'z ustimda ishlash uchun nima qilay? G'iybat qilmaslik uchun nima qilay? Vaqtimni behuda sarflab qo'ymasik uchun nima qilay? Namozim qazo bo'lmasligi uchun nima qilay? Qur'on/ilmga vaqt ajratish uchun nima qilay? Biz bu savollarni so'rayotganda katta bir muammoni hal qilmoqchidek tuyulamiz. Aslida esa bu oddiy narsalarni qiyinlashtirishdan boshqa narsa emas. Aytingchi, ovqat qilishi …

⚡286custom 5945265705908703841112😢73

29 Oct 2026, 05:30 UTC≈9,050 views441 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Ikkinchisi sizni o'ziga xos va takrorlanmas qiladi 1. O'g'irlanishi mumkin bo'lgan mulklar: 🟠pul-mablag'; 🟠uy, mashina; 🟠kiyim va texnika; 🟠yor-do'st; 🟠mansab, shuhrat,.. 2. O'girlanmaydigan narsalar: 🟠e'tiqod va iymon; 🟠zehn, hikmat va himmat; 🟠pok qalb va solih amal; 🟠go'zal xulq va tarbiya topgan xarakter; 🟠yumshoq ko'nikmalar va tajriba; 🟠muhabbat va birodarlik; 🟠oliyjanoblik va sharaf; 🟠qadriyat va fikrlash,..…

⚡245custom 5945265705908703841129😢67

28 Oct 2026, 06:11 UTC≈10,400 views486 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

#qalbdan Zulumatga o'rgangan ko'zga nur tushsa, og'riydi. Gunohga o'rgangan odam taqvodan qo'rqadi, qochadi. Mazahga o'rgangan til uchun sodiq gaplar erish va zerikarli tuyuladi. Zulumatga o'rganib qolma. Gunohga o'rganib qolma. Hidoyatsizlikka o'rganib qolma. Darssizlikka o'rganib qolma. Ustozsizlikka o'rganib qolma. Keyin ustozing shayton bo'lishiga o'rganib qolma. Havo-i nafsing ko'yiga tushishga o'rganib qolma.…

custom 5945265705908703841264⚡146😢76

Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @weareululalbab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 22 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Andijon namoz vaqtlari 🕟 | taqvim.uz
@andijon_namoz · 30,053
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 9 September 2026
Kitob nuri
@kitob_nuri · 29,453
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
ustozation
@ustozation · 35,529
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 1 September 2026
G'anisher Otaboyev | Blog
@otaboyevblog · 37,016
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 31 August 2026
Ustoz Kundaligi
@Ustoz_kundaligi · 18,749
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 September 2026
Barno Mukimova Official
@barnomukimova_official · 32,821
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 September 2026
Hasanxon Yahyo Abdulmajid | Rasmiy
@hasanxondomlauz · 59,973
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
Muslimaat.uz
@muslimaatuz · 51,469
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 24 August 2026
Husayn Buxoriy
@husayn_buxoriy · 33,205
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 4 September 2026
Arab tilini o‘rganamiz
@arabtili_tv · 28,072
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
Aziz Rahimov
@azizrakhimov_blog · 59,890
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
RM 1.0
@ozodbek_sk · 10
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
IELTS SPEAKING ASSISTANT APP QUESTIONS
@IELTS_Speaking_Assistant_App · 54,591
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
Jo’rabek Sanokulov | IELTS
@ieltswithsanokulov · 53,394
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ULUL ALBAB - The People of Intellect” (@weareululalbab), 14,482 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weareululalbab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.