Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 84 days, net +530. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,387–6,076 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 21:55
5,996
+118
4 Nov 2026, 14:00
5,878
+3
1 Nov 2026, 13:35
5,875
+6
29 Oct 2026, 15:09
5,869
+200
27 Oct 2026, 01:27
5,669
-3
23 Oct 2026, 22:57
5,672
-12
21 Oct 2026, 00:45
5,684
-14
18 Oct 2026, 08:41
5,698
-11
15 Oct 2026, 12:00
5,709
-4
12 Oct 2026, 11:46
5,713
-14
5 Oct 2026, 13:16
5,727
+1
27 Sept 2026, 23:18
5,726
-12
18 Sept 2026, 03:01
5,738
-3
13 Sept 2026, 14:59
5,741
-7
9 Sept 2026, 22:00
5,748
+25
4 Sept 2026, 11:20
5,723
+111
31 Aug 2026, 23:37
5,612
+83
28 Aug 2026, 22:54
5,529
+9
26 Aug 2026, 02:44
5,520
+31
19 Aug 2026, 11:55
5,489
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 22 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 09s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,115 reactions across 24 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,831
86.6%
👍
138
6.52%
🔥
123
5.82%
😁
23
1.09%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Coming soon… ✌️❤️💪
ان شا الله امسال نیز با ویس های ویک تاک در خدمت دوستان خوبم هستم..
اول بریم سراغ مقایسه و چشم و هم چشمی.. که تله ای بزرگ برای هر هدف بزرگی از جمله آزمون های بزرگ هست..
همیشه پیش از جلسات پرسش و پاسخ با نفرات برتر آزمون دستیاری تاکید کردم که اگر شخصا خودم گفتم استفاده از ویس و خلاصه طلایی ، اینفینیتی ها.. تایمکس ها.. مدامید.. اسمارت و … تضمین کننده موفقیت شماست و عدم استفاده از آن ها یعنی فاجعه…
نظم … نظم… نظم…
قانون اول و دوم و سوم برای موفقیت در آزمون های بزرگ نظمه.. نظم یعنی در دوره مطالعاتی هر چیزی باید سر جاش باشه..
مطالعه سر جاش باشه.. استراحت بین مطالعه سر جاش باشه.. ورزش سر جاش باشه.. ذهن و تمرکزت سر جاش باشه.. خانواده سر جاش باشه.. دوستان سر جاش باشه..
و البته این به جا بودن همه چیز باید هر روز و هر روز و هر روز تکرار بشه.. وقتی همه چیز به جا بود و تکرار شد و تکرار شد و تکرار شد.. می رسید به نظم…
Self confidence & Self esteem..
با تشکر ویژه از خانم دکتر ساجده ودودی عزیز که با راهنمایی خوبشون کمک به ساختار این بحث کردند..
@svadudi_psy
خانم دکتر ودودی همراه با تیم امید در صورت لزوم مشاوره های روانشناسی را برای دوستان خوبم انجام می دهند 👌👌
تمام تلاشم رو کردم در این ویس بتونم یک راه تازه برای شناخت یکی از مهم ترین موضوعات روانشناسی در مسیر آزمون های بزرگ رو باز کنم.. مطمئنا از اینجا به بعد کار اصلی با خودت…
ان شا الله ویس های ویک تاک را از این هفته شروع خواهیم کرد..
در ادامه موضوعاتی که تا الان بحث شده در مورد اعتماد به نفس قرار هست صحبت کنیم..
ان شا الله برای دوستان خوبم مفید واقع بشه❤️✌️💪
https://t.me/weektalk
❤60
Signed Omid Pirhaji
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @weektalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دکتر کیوانی @dr_keivani · 23,991 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
مدمشاور medmoshaver @medmoshaver · 23,586 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WeekTalk (Dr Omid Pirhaji)” (@weektalk), 5,996 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weektalk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
