Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 【蓝火体育&冠军娱乐】官方招商

Channel

【蓝火体育&冠军娱乐】官方招商

@wgzzz

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry

14,836subscribers

-1,062 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001061627232
TypeChannel
Usernames@TG113 @wgzzz
Description双向机器人 @lanhuobetbot 合营客服 @wmty999
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/wgzzz

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@wgzzz/1964 · this entry24 Jul 2026, 09:01 UTC@pj888e/614524 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC1.001.6 hours
@wgzzz/1968 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 05:34 UTC@pj888e/615727 Jul 2026, 05:48 UTC1.0014 minutes
@wgzzz/1972 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC@pj888e/617429 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC1.0018 minutes
@wgzzz/1976 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC@pj888e/61923 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC1.0047 minutes
@wgzzz/1980 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC@pj888e/62035 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC1.003.6 hours
@wgzzz/1981 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC@pj888e/62066 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC1.002 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@pj888e13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0041 minutesthis entry (13–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @wgzzz — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

14,83615,89815,3677 August 2026 — 15,898 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,859 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,842 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,804 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,801 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,788 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,772 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,763 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,697 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,673 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,654 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,626 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,613 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,581 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,555 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,522 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,514 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,512 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,510 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,488 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,460 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,430 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,421 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,413 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,385 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,375 subscribers6 September 2026 — 15,354 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,315 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,244 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,212 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,159 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,137 subscribers28 September 2026 — 15,070 subscribers5 October 2026 — 15,017 subscribers9 October 2026 — 14,954 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,939 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,924 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,913 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,901 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,898 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,896 subscribers22 October 2026 — 14,895 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,892 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,886 subscribers25 October 2026 — 14,877 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,876 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,874 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,872 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,868 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,860 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,853 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,845 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,839 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,841 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,839 subscribers7 November 2026 — 14,836 subscribers7 August 20267 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 92 days, net -1,062. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,677–16,057 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 12:4614,836-3
6 Nov 2026, 13:0014,839-2
4 Nov 2026, 12:4714,841+2
2 Nov 2026, 09:2014,839-6
1 Nov 2026, 07:3014,845-8
31 Oct 2026, 10:5614,853-7
30 Oct 2026, 14:1414,860-8
29 Oct 2026, 16:2914,868-4
28 Oct 2026, 19:4914,872-2
27 Oct 2026, 20:3014,874-2
26 Oct 2026, 21:2914,876-1
25 Oct 2026, 18:2114,877-9
24 Oct 2026, 14:4814,886-6
23 Oct 2026, 17:3514,892-3
22 Oct 2026, 14:5014,895-1
19 Oct 2026, 04:1914,896-2
18 Oct 2026, 01:0714,898-3
16 Oct 2026, 21:4514,901-12
15 Oct 2026, 19:4014,913-11
14 Oct 2026, 20:3614,924first reading

Engagement

87 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.119%
avg views ÷ 14,836 subscribers
Avg views / post
17.6
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
30
of 87 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held87 (23 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total528
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 05:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
393
Videos
27
Links
241

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 13:10 UTC11 viewsread 8 November 2026

11月8日 早场足球赛事推荐 瑞典超 00:30 代格福什 vs 加尔斯 加尔斯 -0/0.5 全场大 2.5 英超 01:30 诺丁汉森林 vs 曼城 曼城 -0.5/1 全场大 2.5/3 德甲 01:30 斯图加特 vs 云达不莱梅 云达不莱梅 -0.5/1 法甲 02:00 欧塞尔 vs 巴黎 巴黎 -0.5 波兰超 03:15 维泽夫洛兹 vs 沙斯辛 沙斯辛 +0/0.5 意甲 03:45 罗马 vs 萨索洛 全场大 3.5 西甲 04:00 华伦西亚 vs 皇家马德里 全场大 3/3.5 法甲 04:05 巴黎圣日耳曼 vs 特鲁瓦 巴黎圣日耳曼 -2/2.5 葡超 04:30 里斯本竞技 vs 莫雷伦斯 莫雷伦斯 +2/2.5

7 Nov 2026, 07:44 UTC13 viewsread 8 November 2026

11月7日 足球赛事推荐 澳超 16:40 墨尔本城 vs 西悉尼流浪者 全场小 2.5/3 俄超 19:00 沃罗涅日火炬 vs 莫斯科迪纳摩 莫斯科迪纳摩 -0.5/1 泰超 20:00 狮子港 vs 春武里 全场大 3 德乙 20:00 奥斯纳布吕克 vs 凯泽斯劳滕 凯泽斯劳滕 0 全场大 2.5/3 英冠 20:30 威斯汉姆 vs 狼队 狼队 -0/0.5 全场小 2.5 英超 20:30 利兹联 vs 热刺 热刺 0 意甲 22:00 卡利亚里 vs 弗洛西诺尼 卡利亚里 +0/0.5 意甲 22:00 都灵 vs 莱切 都灵 -0.5 全场大 2.5 德甲 22:30 美因茨 vs 拜仁慕尼黑 拜仁慕尼黑 -1.5/2 全场小 4 德甲 22:30 多特蒙德 vs 艾禾斯堡 多特蒙德 -1.5/2 英超 23:00 阿森纳 vs 赫尔城 全场大 …

6 Nov 2026, 10:18 UTC17 viewsread 8 November 2026

11月7日 早场足球赛事推荐 德乙 01:30 布伦瑞克 vs 科特布斯 布伦瑞克 -0.5 全场小 3/3.5 瑞典超 02:00 哈马比 vs 埃尔夫斯堡 全场小 3 荷甲 03:00 威廉二世 vs 兹沃勒 兹沃勒 0 全场小 3 德甲 03:30 汉堡 vs 门兴格拉德巴赫 汉堡 0 全场大 2.5/3 苏冠 03:30 威夫流浪队 vs 邓弗姆林 邓弗姆林 0 英足总 03:45 牛津城 vs 莱斯特城 全场小 3/3.5 法甲 03:45 图卢兹 vs 斯特拉斯堡 图卢兹 -0/0.5 全场大 2.5/3 意甲 03:45 威尼斯 vs 乌迪内斯 乌迪内斯 +0/0.5 全场小 2.5/3 英超 04:00 埃弗顿 vs 考文垂 埃弗顿 -0.5/1 全场大 2.5/3 西甲 04:00 塞维利亚 vs 阿拉维斯 塞维利亚 -0.5 英冠 04:00…

6 Nov 2026, 07:07 UTC12 viewsread 8 November 2026

11月6日 足球赛事推荐 印尼超 16:30 永亚卡达 vs 德瓦 全场大 2.5 澳超 16:40 悉尼 vs 中央海岸水手 全场小 3 越南联 19:00 河静红林 vs 南定 南定 -0/0.5 乌克超 19:00 普莱西亚 vs 维勒斯 全场小 3 以超 20:00 特拉维夫马卡比 vs 马卡比迪克瓦 全场大 3.5 印尼超 20:00 马都拉联 vs 阿雷马 马都拉联 -0/0.5 印度超 22:00 果阿 vs 班加鲁鲁 班加鲁鲁 0

5 Nov 2026, 12:46 UTC17 viewsread 8 November 2026

11月6日 早场足球赛事推荐 欧协联 01:45 亚特兰大 vs 凯拉特艾马迪 凯拉特艾马迪 +2/2.5 欧协联 01:45 古比斯 vs 根特 全场大 2.5 欧协联 01:45 图恩 vs 赫斯 赫斯 +0/0.5 欧协联 04:00 勒沃库森 vs 马赛 勒沃库森 -1.5 欧协联 04:00 摩纳哥 vs 洛斯查兰德 全场小 3/3.5 欧协联 04:00 哥本哈根 vs 提比利锡1999 提比利锡1999 +2/2.5 欧协联 04:00 卢加诺 vs 考诺萨基列斯 卢加诺 -2

5 Nov 2026, 07:24 UTC14 viewsread 8 November 2026

11月5日 足球赛事推荐 亚冠二 18:00 狮城水手 vs 阿德莱德联 狮城水手 -0.5/1 亚冠二 18:00 町田泽维亚 vs 上海申花 町田泽维亚 -1/1.5 全场小 3 印度超 19:30 巴得斯尤 vs 东北联 东北联 -0.5 亚冠二 20:15 古晋城 vs 江原 全场小 2.5 印度超 22:00 莫亨巴根 vs 奥迪萨 全场小 3 埃及杯 23:00 埃及银行体育会 vs 博迪福阿德 埃及银行体育会 -1.5 欧协联 01:45 皇家社会 vs 里昂 皇家社会 -0.5 欧协联 01:45 水晶宫 vs 霍芬海姆 全场大 3 欧协联 01:45 特拉布宗体育 vs 弗赖堡 弗赖堡 +0/0.5 全场小 3 欧协联 01:45 皇家社会 vs 里昂 皇家社会 -0.5/1 全场大 3 欧协联 01:45 布拉格斯巴达 vs 伯恩茅斯 伯恩茅…

4 Nov 2026, 09:49 UTC9 viewsread 8 November 2026

11月5日 早场足球赛事推荐 亚冠二 00:00 艾尔维达 vs 卡利迪亚 卡利迪亚 +1 欧冠 01:45 AEK雅典 vs 皇家马德里 皇家马德里 -1.5/2 全场大 3.5/4 欧冠 01:45 费内巴切 vs 利物浦 利物浦 -1 全场小 3.5 英冠 03:45 威斯汉姆 vs 米德尔斯堡 米德尔斯堡 -0.5/1 欧冠 04:00 布拉格斯拉维亚 vs 阿森纳 全场大 2.5/3 欧冠 04:00 埃因霍温 vs 布鲁日 布鲁日 +0.5 欧冠 04:00 多特蒙德 vs 皇家贝蒂斯 皇家贝蒂斯 +0.5/1 欧冠 04:00 波尔图 vs 那不勒斯 全场大 2.5/3 欧冠 04:00 朗斯 vs 科木 朗斯 +0/0.5 欧冠 04:00 维京 vs 沙巴巴库 沙巴巴库 +1.5 英冠 04:00 布里斯托尔城 vs 狼队 狼队 -0/0.5 …

4 Nov 2026, 07:08 UTC12 viewsread 8 November 2026

11月4日 足球赛事推荐 亚冠二 18:00 首尔FC vs 越南电信 首尔FC -2.5 全场大 3.5 亚冠精英 18:00 浦项制铁 vs 大阪飞脚 大阪飞脚 -0.5 印尼杯 20:00 佩斯凯迪瑞 vs 伯西索罗 全场小 3 亚冠精英 20:15 武里南联 vs 鹿岛鹿角 鹿岛鹿角 -0.5 全场大 2.5/3 埃及杯 23:00 泽德 vs 塔拉雅 泽德 -0.5 葡U23 23:00 利亚拿U23 vs 伊斯托里尔U23 伊斯托里尔U23 0 埃及杯 23:00 加斯马哈拉 vs 伊蒂哈德亚历山大 全场大 1.5/2 欧罗巴 23:30 雷恩 vs 奥林匹亚科斯 全场小 2.5/3

3 Nov 2026, 09:51 UTC15 viewsread 8 November 2026

11月4日 早场足球赛事推荐 亚冠精英 00:00 德黑兰独立 vs 北部区体育 德黑兰独立 -0/0.5 全场大 2/2.5 欧冠 01:45 加拉塔萨雷 vs 斯图加特 斯图加特 +0/0.5 全场大 3.5 欧冠 01:45 顿涅茨克矿工 vs 里斯本竞技 全场小 2.5/3 瑞典超 02:00 天狼星 vs 哈尔姆斯塔德 天狼星 -1.5/2 全场大 3.5 亚冠精英 02:15 希拉尔 vs 迪拜青年国民 迪拜青年国民 +1/1.5 英冠 03:45 朴茨茅斯 vs 斯旺西 全场大 2/2.5 英冠 03:45 布莱克本 vs 斯托克城 斯托克城 0 全场大 2/2.5 欧冠 04:00 比利亚雷亚尔 vs 巴黎圣日耳曼 巴黎圣日耳曼 -0.5/1 全场小 3.5 欧冠 04:00 曼联 vs 罗马 全场大 3 欧冠 04:00 巴塞罗那 vs 阿斯顿维拉 …

3 Nov 2026, 06:31 UTC15 viewsread 8 November 2026

11月3日 足球赛事推荐 亚冠精英 18:00 神户胜利船 vs 拉查布里府 神户胜利船 -1.5/2 亚冠精英 18:00 柏太阳神 vs 大田韩亚市民 全场大 2.5/3 亚冠精英 18:00 全北现代 vs 柔佛新山 全北现代 +0/0.5 全场大 2.5 亚冠精英 20:15 狮子港 vs 北京国安 北京国安 -0.5/1 亚冠精英 20:15 河内公安 vs 京都不死鸟 全场大 2.5 亚冠二 21:45 东孟加拉 vs 席贝 全场小 2/2.5 海湾锦标 22:30 扎乌拉 vs 阿尔瑞法 扎乌拉 -0/0.5 埃及联杯 23:00 阿尔卡纳 vs 现代体育 全场大 2

2 Nov 2026, 10:04 UTC16 viewsread 8 November 2026

11月3日 早场足球赛事推荐 亚冠精英 00:00 萨德 vs 吉达国民 吉达国民 0 全场大 2.5/3 意甲 01:30 萨索洛 vs 佛罗伦萨 佛罗伦萨 -0/0.5 全场大 3 埃及联杯 02:00 阿尔艾利开罗 vs 阿拉伯建筑 阿尔艾利开罗 -1/1.5 亚冠精英 02:15 吉达联合 vs 艾因 艾因 +0.5 全场小 3 亚冠精英 02:15 加拉法 vs 胡拜尔库迪西亚 胡拜尔库迪西亚 -1/1.5 全场大 3/3.5 波兰超 03:30 琴斯托霍瓦 vs 沙斯辛 全场小 3 意甲 03:45 亚特兰大 vs 帕尔马 亚特兰大 -1 法甲 03:45 洛里昂 vs 布雷斯特 洛里昂 0 英超 04:00 纽卡斯尔 vs 埃弗顿 全场大 2.5/3 西甲 04:00 拉科鲁尼亚 vs 奥萨苏纳 全场小 2/2.5 葡超 04:15 本菲卡 vs …

2 Nov 2026, 06:17 UTC20 viewsread 8 November 2026

11月2日 足球赛事推荐 乌克超 19:00 卡夫巴斯 vs 基辅迪纳摩 基辅迪纳摩 -1/1.5 泰超 20:00 春武里 vs 巴吞联 巴吞联 0 肯尼超 20:00 图斯科 vs 马拉糖 全场小 2 沙地甲 20:30 查巴莱 vs 布凯里耶 查巴莱 -0.5/1 西乙 21:00 特内里费 vs FC安道尔 全场小 2/2.5 亚冠精英 21:45 塔什干棉农 vs 利雅得胜利 利雅得胜利 -1 全场大 2.5/3 俄超 23:00 苏维杜夫 vs 圣彼得堡泽尼特 圣彼得堡泽尼特 -1 罗甲 23:30 沃伦塔里 vs 法乌尔 全场大 2.5/3

Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @wgzzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“【蓝火体育&冠军娱乐】官方招商” (@wgzzz), 14,836 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wgzzz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.