Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 武汉报告参考📝

Channel

武汉报告参考📝

@whbgcankao

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

37,731subscribers

+6,922 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002082928536
TypeChannel
Username@whbgcankao
Description报告包含强烈个人情感 掺杂他人自身情绪于喜好 别人喜欢你不一定喜欢 好评不一定好,可能是造假找枪手刷的! 差评不一定差,可能是部分人一己私欲的请求没被同意,怒起泄愤! 无论好评差评,都是情绪化产物,优点或者缺点被夸大其词,请各位素质出击,如实评论反馈。 报告仅供参考,出击自行判断 Hello @Telegram My channel has not violated the rules and policy of using Telegram. Please pay attention. @rov
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/whbgcankao

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

30,23337,73133,9828 August 20267 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 91 days, net +6,922. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,108–38,856 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 22:3137,731+89
6 Nov 2026, 21:0037,642+100
5 Nov 2026, 21:3937,542+46
4 Nov 2026, 20:3837,496+61
3 Nov 2026, 22:5537,435+81
2 Nov 2026, 19:3937,354+110
1 Nov 2026, 21:1737,244+65
31 Oct 2026, 19:5037,179+43
30 Oct 2026, 20:5537,136+31
29 Oct 2026, 22:5637,105+42
28 Oct 2026, 22:0737,063+48
27 Oct 2026, 23:2737,015+57
26 Oct 2026, 21:4036,958+64
25 Oct 2026, 22:1536,894+66
24 Oct 2026, 19:5036,828+64
23 Oct 2026, 20:2836,764+41
22 Oct 2026, 20:3036,723+56
21 Oct 2026, 18:4736,667+66
20 Oct 2026, 15:0936,601+43
19 Oct 2026, 15:4636,558first reading

Engagement

2,415 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 164 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.546%
avg views ÷ 37,731 subscribers
Avg views / post
206
934 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.483%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
934
of 2,415 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 139 of 934 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held2,415 (8 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total192,285
Reactions total179
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,550
Videos
≈534
Links
≈3,470

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 45s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

183 reactions across 104 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9049.2%
👍3318.0%
🔥2111.5%
😍168.74%
💯147.65%
🥰31.64%
👎21.09%
👏21.09%
😁21.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 146 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 October 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 323 of 934 posts held from the last 30 days (34.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 13:59 UTC97 viewsread 8 November 2026

【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:喵喵酱 【留名】:下 雨 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:8 【综合】:9.17 【过程】:看了好久还是选择了喵喵酱这位萝莉老师。果断约上,到了老师楼下,老师指引上楼,开门很心动。声音好听。亲了亲然后就去洗澡了。让老师换成了黑丝,然后就是开始猛猛舌吻了。约的pp,硬了就想先把一水出了。让老师立刻坐上来,一进去就感觉很美妙,那感觉很不错,紧紧的有水。女上了一会就让老师换成后人了。几浅一深和快速抽查换着来,很爽。然后又转换成我在上面,压着老师的腿,疯狂抽插,很快就出水了,爽。休息的时候就是聊天和舌吻了。第二次的时候状态不咋行,没休息好,不好出水就放弃了。整体来说还是不错的。老师也很热情,笑嘻嘻的,情绪给的好,不会很尴尬。不错的,很推荐。 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy

8 Nov 2026, 13:58 UTC79 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:薰衣草 【留名】:Jada Cullen 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.67 【过程】:老师离我很近,十几分钟路程,这倒是很方便,看了老师评论而来,好评率很高,憋了好久,一直没找到机会出击,难得出来偷吃,老师还是没让我失望,见到老师,进门老师微笑迎接,给人一种家有回家的感觉,说话声音很温柔,很有魅力,肌肤很细腻,不得不说保养的非常好,立马交水费,妩媚的眼神老师又会勾人,看上去着实让我受不了,匆忙洗个澡,洗完澡到床上服务,老师开始用她独有的舌头开始对我小弟疯狂输出,来回游走,太爽了,她口着我小弟,我抚摸她的小穴,太有感觉了,让老师帮我带上来保护伞,疯狂的输出,刚进去老师的小穴很热,蜜穴很紧,能感觉到被紧紧包裹着的感觉,操着真爽,犹如拔葱,感觉拉满,控制不住就射了出来,久久难以忘怀。值得推荐,人很好 很配合👍不催钟,…

8 Nov 2026, 13:58 UTC58 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:林雪儿 【留名】:盱眙小龙虾 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:老师颜值👍👍👍,皮肤很白,大长腿,穿了高跟鞋👠,显得腿更长了,身材很好,聊了一会直接进入主题。洗澡的时候给我口的好舒服,老师身上摸起来很柔软。胸刚刚好摸着很爽。刚插进去就很舒服 柔软的身体 我用两只手抓住老师的胸 我快忍不住了 我有坚持了一下 但是还是坚持不住射了 太舒服。老师服务非常好 就像和女朋友一样的感觉,值得推荐! ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy

8 Nov 2026, 13:58 UTC56 viewsread 8 November 2026

【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:吕馨 【留名】:禾粉🏍️🌰🎊🌼🍊🍑 🌉 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:9 【过程】:好久没有cj了,难得有时间出来,关注吕馨有一段时间了,赶紧发消息,正好时间对的上,心中狂喜😆。 到了之后第一印象挺不错赶紧脱光光洗澡,有点点急不可耐了嘿嘿。来到床上就开始热烈的湿吻,蛇了有一会就向下亲我麻麻然后慢慢往下一口含住,含住的那一刹那简直无法用言语形容,后面的口活也是太棒了。赶紧先来一发,先女上干了一会就把老师压在身下,掰开腿卧槽这BB也太漂亮了🤩。赶紧捅进去,在慢慢抽插中感受着穴中的温暖湿润并且逐步加快频率,只可惜人到中登体力大不如从前没多久竟略显疲惫T_T。欣慰的是老师并没嫌我废物提议让我躺下休息并且不断热烈的亲吻我、轻抚我、挑逗我,在老师不懈的努力下我终于重振雄风,赶紧提枪上马打开腿再见那漂亮的BB开始全力冲刺,在老师索吻中和一…

8 Nov 2026, 13:08 UTC152 viewsread 8 November 2026

【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:阿娇 【留名】:我哈哈 你哈哈 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9.5 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.58 【过程】:技术好的老师。身材很好,腰很细,屁股又软又大,约好时间出击,课室也干净,衣服脱下那身材很棒,换上情趣装更让人热血沸腾,还挺会整活,尤其是口活太棒了,69 吹潇两分钟就硬得不行了戴套开始今天状态很好,很硬,插的老师呻吟不断,放的开,夹得我紧致饱满,后入拍着屁股,太幸福了休息期间也会一直按摩聊天不冷场,态度也很好。全程情绪拉满,非常享受 。 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy

8 Nov 2026, 13:08 UTC140 viewsread 8 November 2026

【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:萌儿 【留名】:摇太阳 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:按照指示上楼,开门见人,人比照片好看,环境看着很有档次,干净卫,简单交流,一起共浴,共浴时看着连走动都在不断颤抖的柔软,简直是按捺不住想要把玩的冲动....萌儿洗得十分温柔细致。 来到床上,本狼的手也攀上了高峰,不断揉捏着。 直至正戏,萌儿似乎是比较害羞的类型,微微侧过头去不愿发出呻吟。 然随着频率不断加快,嗓眼里的闷哼声逐渐变为娇喘....真实的反馈更加令人上头😝 冲击中,胸前强烈的晃动迷人双眼,视觉的刺激根本无法从这简短的文字中描述而出.... 最后忘记牵手拍照了😂😂 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy

8 Nov 2026, 12:43 UTC163 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:玉儿 【留名】:嘚吧嘚儿 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.5 【过程】:约到老师红休后首课,遥控上楼,进门就是一个大大的拥抱,然后脱衣服陪浴,服务拉满,洗完帮擦,然后就是开始服务了,AB 面,口活无敌,忍不住就开大了,奈何姐姐又紧又热,很快就缴枪了,完事了一边按摩一边聊天,时间很快奥,接着就是第二发,这回嘎嘎猛,姐姐叫床也好听,猛猛出货。 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy

8 Nov 2026, 12:27 UTC121 viewsread 8 November 2026

【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:小甜心 【留名】:Paopao G 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:有一段时间没来找她了,听老师遥控上楼,室内整洁卫生,有情调,人美声甜,开朗的cos小姐姐型,坐沙发聊了一会,自动交了水费… 老师带我去洗澡,老师洗澡很温柔细致,干净清爽,让我坐在床上边享受着她的全套的服务 小弟弟不争气的瞬间爆炸溜溜了,不得不说老师的口技了得,很舒服,老师温暖的舌头让我很舒服,手轻柔得在我大腿中间的小弟弟来回折腾,瞬间膨胀了,忍住没有出水 正面调情,老师抱着我很温暖…从我的耳朵到小弟弟让我瞬间升温,滑滑的,很舒服,360丝滑的口活让我的小弟弟大大的…让我感觉小弟弟要出水了 最后直接带套上阵出货 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy

8 Nov 2026, 12:27 UTC120 viewsread 8 November 2026

【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:广西妹妹 【留名】:默 幽 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:8 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:8.83 【过程】:进去后就鸳鸯浴 。再就一系列服务 。酥酥麻麻的 。睡了一夜 。感觉像女友一样 。 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy

8 Nov 2026, 11:48 UTC192 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:十二 【留名】:J 粉雾海 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:第二十五次找十二,真的非常值得,每次一有空就来找十二,就知道她有多好了,瘦瘦小小的,今天嘎嘎累见到十二心情都变好了,今天衣服也很好看第一次见😛今天的十二坏坏的哈哈哈还咬人,依旧女上出来了,非常卖力😭今天不知为何感觉非常好!中场休息聊聊天看看视频,又是被榨干的一天 常年看十二的人都目光炯炯有神,非常自信,且智商逐年上升,最后完全成为天才🤓 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy

❤1

8 Nov 2026, 11:34 UTC202 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:十二 【留名】:Patrick Ward 【人照】:9.6 【颜值】:9.7 【身材】:9.6 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9.5 【综合】:9.73 【过程】:课表上的都有,老师服务的很好,口活很耐心,还让挑了制服,一水女上受不了一会就被秒了,还是让老师用的最温柔的档位😭,休息的时候老师也很能说很健谈聊了很多,二水状态有点不好,老师很耐心最后也是顺利出水。很好玩服务很好的一个老师,值得冲 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy

8 Nov 2026, 11:01 UTC203 viewsread 8 November 2026

【时间】:2026-11-08 【老师】:暖暖 【留名】:民 哈明 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:遥控上楼,约好老师的P。身材高挑,颜值在线。选了一套连体的黑丝。二弟直接起飞。比较配合。服务流畅。下次再来 ✳️Powered by @whkdyyy

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,415 posts we hold for @whbgcankao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @whbgcankao as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
30 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
30 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“武汉报告参考📝” (@whbgcankao), 37,731 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/whbgcankao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.