Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 51.4%
- avg views ÷ 505 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 260
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
12 Sept 2026, 10:02 UTC120 views0 reactionsread 12 September 2026 Forwarded from @whbgcankao
【时间】：2026-09-12
【老师】：枳夏
【留名】：Kirsten Orozco
【人照】：10
【颜值】：10
【身材】：10
【服务】：10
【态度】：10
【环境】：10
【综合】：10
【过程】：小区环境很安全，也好🅿️车，房间布置的精致，客厅的氛围灯也恰到好处，看着很舒服，ls的妆容也恰到好处，非常漂亮一个重庆妹妹，本人自认为比照片更上像更好看，特别是眼睛，身材也是非常匀称，有点高，是那种职业御姐的画风，很漂亮，一头乌黑黑长发搭配包臀裙，再加一双雪白修长的白腿，丝袜也是自带蕾丝，治愈了我不远660公里驱车来约这个ls,脱了衣服陪浴，全身光滑雪白，胸不算很大，形状很好看，也很挺，在沐浴的过成中享受了水中萧，然后上床开始口，技术很好，差点就被缴械，我提出要帮老师口，69也是极度配合，掰开狠狠嗦老师也配合的呻吟，明显🈶淫水就出，然后开始进入ls身体，看着ls这漂亮的五官，我问ls能不能架起腿，老师也是非常自觉的把🦵🏻放…
12 Sept 2026, 04:59 UTC177 viewsread 12 September 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
12 Sept 2026, 04:06 UTC182 viewsread 12 September 2026 Video
Video, posted without a caption
12 Sept 2026, 04:06 UTC174 viewsread 12 September 2026 开课啦，下午🈶🈳位，🉑约
11 Sept 2026, 22:15 UTC201 viewsread 12 September 2026 Forwarded from @XiaomengGroupBot
【时间】：2026-09-12
【老师】：枳夏
【留名】：Kobe Moore
【人照】：9.5
【颜值】：10
【身材】：10
【服务】：10
【态度】：9.5
【环境】：10
【综合】：9.83
【过程】：出击这个老师，心里还是满怀期待，前一天约的，刚开门看看老师的穿着打扮，非常吸睛，身材也高挑我，略微偏瘦，这双眼睛本就从图片吸引到我了，看到本人眼睛更好看，大眼睛，ls很健谈说我有点害羞，毕竟我才20出头，也属正常，然后跟ls一起沐浴，洗完之后，老师很自觉的开始服务，开始口，手不由自主的，摸到老师的酮体，皮肤有紧致感，问了以后才知道，老师也健身，皮肤很白也光滑，手感很好，不愧是锻炼过的，老师情绪价值给的非常足，说从没见我这么长的，她有点害怕，情绪酝酿完，开始进入，老师让我轻一点，刚开始慢慢插进去，明显有紧致感，后面稍微用力一点，老师说宝贝插的好深啊，我有点心疼，就不敢全放进去。我温柔的呵护着这个老师，生怕给她弄疼，毕竟我这玩…
Channel photo updated
枳夏的🍒朋友圈 pinned a video
枳夏的🍒朋友圈 pinned a photo
枳夏的🍒朋友圈 pinned a photo
枳夏的🍒朋友圈 pinned a video
11 Sept 2026, 19:08 UTC193 viewsread 12 September 2026 Video
Video, posted without a caption
11 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC209 viewsread 12 September 2026 🈵了，🉑预约明天
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zx98985. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“枳夏的🍒朋友圈” (@zx98985), 505 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zx98985.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
