Masjid As-Sahabah 295-297 Haggerston London E8 4EN 🌐 masjidsahabah.org

Channel
Women's Benefits
@womensbenefits
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,317subscribers
+133 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002078731583 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @womensbenefits |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/womensbenefits |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 8,317 | +19 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 8,298 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 8,296 | +14 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 8,282 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:18 | 8,281 | +24 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 8,257 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 8,253 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 8,254 | +12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 8,242 | +14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 8,228 | +18 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 8,210 | +8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 8,202 | +19 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 8,183 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 8,184 | first reading |
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.47%
- avg views ÷ 8,317 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 372
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (18 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,486 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 27s
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Updated prayer times as of today: Fajr -> 5:15 Isha -> 9:45 Important Notes: • Shaykh Daghash Al-‘Ajmi ḥafidhahullāh will deliver today’s khuṭbah. • Today’s khuṭbah is open to both brothers and sisters. Sisters will be accommodated downstairs, and their doors will be open from 12:00 onwards. • Jumu’ah khutbah starts at 1:20. ____ Masjid As-Sahabah 295-297 Haggerston London E8 4EN 🌐 masjidsahabah.org
Delaying Marriage; Causes And Solutions Sheikh Daghash Al-Ajmi hafidhahullah Includes a Q&A Session 14 Rabi' Al-Awwal 1448 AH (Thursday, August 27, 2026)
📢 NOTICE Tonight’s lecture with Shaykh Dagash Al-Ajmi حفظه الله is hosted by our brothers at Masjid Muqbil. 📍 Location: Hatch End High School Headstone Lane HA3 6NR ▪️ Open to brothers and sisters Please share and encourage others to attend.
Assalamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh, I came across your recent post on Women Benefit about culture and marriage https://t.me/womensbenefits/1915. I agreed with much of what was said, but I wanted to anonymously share another perspective that I think is sometimes overlooked, particularly for sisters navigating this situation with their families. I wrote it in the form of a short poem. May Allah reward you…
💭Are you really looking for deen? We review many profiles daily. We respect everyone’s right to list their requirements and preferences, but we are noticing a deeply concerning issue. We see many profiles stating: “My parents only wish for me to marry within my own ethnicity,” or “My parents don’t want me to engage in polygyny” and when some individuals expand on their preferences they only include their own ethnici…
Women's Benefits pinned a photo
✨ Itinerary for Upcoming Dawrah With Sheikh Daghash Al-Ajmi hafidhahullah An opportunity to spend five days immersed in beneficial knowledge, from 26th–31st August 2026, featuring a series of lectures, explanations of two works, and dedicated Q&A sessions. The dawrah will address important matters related to ‘Aqeedah, Manhaj, contemporary challenges facing our community, and other subjects of benefit to the Muslim.…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم ❓Question: 1. How can I reassure my father Islamically regarding his fear about his old age and his daughters' ability to care for him after marriage? 2. What is the correct Islamic understanding of a daughter's responsibility towards her parents after she gets married? 3. Am I wrong in choosing not to work and instead remain at home, if my intention is to adhere to what I believe is more ple…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @womensbenefits. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@masjidsahabah · 7,1199 postsThe Official English Channel for Shaykh Abū ʿAbdur-Raḥmān Yaḥyā ibn ʿAlī al-Ḥajūrī
@ShaykhYahyaEn · 3,1202 postsAhlul-Khayr Productions
@AhlulKhayrProductions · 6851 postMasjid Al-Imām Muqbil
@MasjidAlImaamMuqbil · 10,1571 postCore Islamic Courses In Creed & Fiqh
@coreIslamiccourse · 4,1811 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@k2knyc · 21,251
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 September 2026
@Osmania · 28,862
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 9 September 2026
@BeneficialKnowledge · 26,517
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Women's Benefits” (@womensbenefits), 8,317 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/womensbenefits.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.