Айфон новый будете покупать?

Channel
X nine Gift Radar
@x9xxxx
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
26,922subscribers
+2,782 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002350909358 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @x9xxxx |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/x9xxxx |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 26,922 | -83 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 27,005 | -96 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:39 | 27,101 | -68 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 27,169 | -102 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 27,271 | -14,091 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 41,362 | +16,401 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 24,961 | +92 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 24,869 | -30 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:43 | 24,899 | -75 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 24,974 | -68 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 25,042 | +8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 25,034 | +170 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 24,864 | +212 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 24,652 | -60 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 24,712 | -47 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 24,759 | -78 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 24,837 | +112 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 24,725 | +211 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 24,514 | +208 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 24,306 | first reading |
Engagement
118 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.5%
- avg views ÷ 26,922 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,100
- 53 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 53
- of 118 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 118 (30 July 2026 – 10 September 2026) |
| Views total | 164,043 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Sept 2026, 00:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 6m 14s
- Average length
- 1m 02s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
دام مخبوصين بيها طريقة توثيق التيك توك بالقناة 🪁 https://t.me/+no4qpij3if1mYjYx
اضافة 3 هدايا يمكنك استخدامها كخلفية 😎 🎁 🎁 🎁 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Channel 🔨 nine ☠️ Chat
تم سرقه 4 كؤوس سعر الواحد 3000 تون بالقليل 👀 ⠀ طريقة احتيال ورابط كل واحد : 🎁 AlgorithmCup-52 - دعم وهمي للسوق 🎁 AlgorithmCup-9 - سوق وهمي لـ باينس 🎁 AlgorithmCup-61 - منصه USDT وهمي 🎁 AlgorithmCup-80 - دعم وهمي لـ ماركت
مفهوم جديد لـ حرق الهدايا 🥳 اقترح شخص إمكانية حرق الهدايا مقابل الحصول على نقاط تقييم عند فتح الهدية ستظهر زر في الزاوية العلوية اليمنى والذي سيفتح نافذة خاصة لحرق ما يصل إلى 10 هدايا رأيكم ؟ 😐 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Channel 🔨 nine ☠️ Chat
💀 ملصق قاتل ويوقف تيليجرام ظهر ملصق يسبب تعطّل تطبيق تيليجرام على iOS وWindows وmacOS بسبب احتوائه على عدد ضخم من النقاط ⚙️ تيليجرام يعمل على إصلاح المشكلة قريبًا ويمكن حذف الملصق عبر نسخة الويب إذا تسبب بتعطّل المحادثة ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Channel 🔨 nine ☠️ Chat
داخل الكروب راح تتوزع 5 - 10 هدية مطوره ساعه 12:12 الي ميعرف الكروب هذا شنو هذا بي روليتات على هدايه بشكل مستمر وشبه يومي ونوافق فقط على المتفاعلين بكروباتنا ومتواجدين اذا متفاعل دز طلب نوافق عليك واذا لا حاول تتفاعل علمود تكون ضمن الكروب نوافق عليك https://t.me/+VFfj-xPJL6szNmMy
تم بيع 🐈⬛ بسعر اغلى من بلوش بيبي 🎁 بيعت مقابل 6888 تون ، 15 مليون عراقي https://t.me/nft/scaredcat-13828 🐈⬛ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Channel 🔨 nine ☠️ Chat
من اكبر المستثمرين في الكريبتو الى مدمن ☀️ رابر روسي ومستمثر كبير بالكريبتو 2022 باع كل البيتكوين الخاص به واشترى تون بعد 4 اعوام اصبح مدمن وتم حظره من دخول اكثر من دوله هل التون هوه السبب الى وصله الى هذه الحاله ؟ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Channel 🔨 nine ☠️ Chat
الي يتوقع 1.*** شكد حيصير ساعه 12 بليل اله مطوره 💵
1.400$
لا يمكن استبدال الهدايا الى نجوم 👀 اقترح ادلر ان يكون نظام التلي غير قابل لـ بيع الهدايا الغير مطوره مقابل نجوم اما ان تقوم بحذفها بدون اي مقابل او إبقائها بحسابك رأيكم ؟ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Channel 🔨 nine ☠️ Chat
Showing the 12 most recent of 118 posts we hold for @x9xxxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@x9xxxx edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 13 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 31 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@x9xxx · 21,3588 postsX nine Services
@xxx9x · 15,1617 postsx nine
@xxxx9 · 30,2727 postsاكس ناين • Xx nine
@xx99x · 10,5793 postsقناة بوت Nbox
@eeee9h · 28,5432 postsX nine vault
@xx9xx · 9,9052 postsاكس ناين هدايا - X9 Gift
@Gift_X9 · 14,2751 postX MeN
@LM_Eem · 411 postpervichka
@pervichka · 31 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Gift_X9 · 14,2758 postsX nine offers
@x9xxx · 21,3586 postsX nine vault
@xx9xx · 9,9056 postsPavel Durov
@durov · 10,721,3993 postsX nine Services
@xxx9x · 15,1612 postsx nine
@xxxx9 · 30,2722 postsGram Price X nine
@GramPriceXnine · 3,5591 postMRKT
@mrkt · 410,4291 postPLUSH PEPE
@plushpepe · 9,2631 postٰ
@xxxix · 1,3211 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“X nine Gift Radar” (@x9xxxx), 26,922 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x9xxxx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.