канал сончи, вот этой девочки из рилсов которая про сценарии рассказывает
- материалы по сторителлингу и креативу
- рецензии/ обсуждения попкультуры
- анонсы моих проектов/курсов/ книг и тд
Created
7 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
53 measurements spanning 91 days, net +62. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,331–13,502 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 53
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 03:16
13,482
+1
4 Nov 2026, 05:51
13,481
+3
3 Nov 2026, 07:31
13,478
-1
2 Nov 2026, 09:15
13,479
+5
1 Nov 2026, 12:46
13,474
-1
31 Oct 2026, 13:45
13,475
+1
30 Oct 2026, 14:35
13,474
+4
29 Oct 2026, 12:10
13,470
-4
28 Oct 2026, 08:26
13,474
+6
27 Oct 2026, 08:01
13,468
-3
26 Oct 2026, 07:26
13,471
+11
25 Oct 2026, 05:30
13,460
+6
24 Oct 2026, 06:07
13,454
+7
23 Oct 2026, 04:57
13,447
+2
22 Oct 2026, 03:40
13,445
+5
20 Oct 2026, 20:47
13,440
-2
19 Oct 2026, 19:55
13,442
-3
18 Oct 2026, 19:38
13,445
-5
16 Oct 2026, 20:49
13,450
+4
14 Oct 2026, 16:47
13,446
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.5%
avg views ÷ 13,482 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,900
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026
Posts held
37 (30 May 2026 – 30 October 2026)
Views total
17,420
Reactions total
718
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 06:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
471
Videos
39
Links
234
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
8,594 reactions across 33 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,870
45.0%
🔥
1,953
22.7%
❤🔥
1,224
14.2%
💘
384
4.47%
😁
325
3.78%
🥰
221
2.57%
👍
102
1.19%
😭
86
1.00%
🍓
69
0.803%
🙏
68
0.791%
🤔
48
0.559%
😍
36
0.419%
💅
34
0.396%
🦄
29
0.337%
😨
24
0.279%
💩
15
0.175%
😱
14
0.163%
💯
11
0.128%
🙈
11
0.128%
👎
10
0.116%
18 further kinds
60
0.698%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,650 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
у меня завтра лекция "как не звучать как ии", держите слайды с нее с основными чертами и справки по ии-интонации и типы метафор
все аргументы, текст, справки - мой текст. иишка была использована только чтобы дополнить примеры на саму себя
это один из моих тезисов для видеоэссе "сторителлинг - это скам"
постинг и блоггинг в сухом остатке - это просто дележка информацией. успешность блогера заключается в навыке делать эту информацию аддиктивной для случайного пользователя или алгоритмов платформы.
сторителлинг в интернете (тот который продают в интернете) это один из способов сделать информациию аддиктивную с помощью драматургического порядка. то ест…
выбираем лого приложения для моих визуальных новелл! я уже пару месяцев застряла между этих 3 вариантов
Андрюша (наш смм) нашел классную бренд концепцию "A24 или Neon но в сфере визуальных новелл" так что лого и название без привычных "орден мечтателей лига романтиков клуб пессимистов"
P. S. цвета технические, могут изменится
степан подарил мне приложение для визуальных новелл, чтобы я не писала истории в стол и закрыла давний гештальт.
у нас есть приложение в тг, без рекламы и внутренней валюты. я люблю писать большую нелинейность и хочется, чтобы у каждого была возможность пройти историю целиком, с кучей выборов
на выходе планируются 3 истории
• Мои жестокие друзья - помесь Бриджертонов и Магической битвы, где тебе нужно заарканить м…
моя новая формула арки персонажа! тот момент, когда я сама недоумеваю почему я делаю это бесплатно.
но я так ждала чтобы ей поделиться... я ее выявила пока писала свой нонфик "от человека к персонажу", это улучшенная версия моей старой (лу+лм+длм)
мне кажется, что получилось очень красиво и удобно. надеюсь, на моих конспектах вам все понятно. если что, задавайте вопросы
будем ее хорошенько тренировать на интенсиве…
простите, но я пришла хватстаться!!!
вы не представляете какой это мед на душу, особенно после постоянных комментариев "писатели таким не занимаются, никакие таблички не работают, творчество не знает правил, из-за таких как вы все и плохо" и бла бла бла
у меня ,наверное, простая позиция насчет контента: пощу все, чтобы заниматься любимым делом было легче, интереснее и с результатом. ну публикация с нуля это конечно…
писательский интенсив!
Warm Writer Autumn - повторяем летний писательский интенсив, с чуть улучшенной программой и новыми тарифами. как раз соберете структуру книги к inktober, мы будем учить теорию, заполнять гайды и редактировать отрывки
🎃7 занятий по 2 часа
🎃24 сентября - 4 октября
🎃(с чт по вс, а потом с пт по вс)
Темы:
1. Идея, логлайн, заявка
2. Мир и окружение
3. Сюжет и структура
4. Персонажи и арка
(пер…
в vogue австралия вышла статья о фанфиках и платформе AO3
в целом статья о том, как стигма стыда спадает с фанфиков, о современных авторах которые вышли с платформы и признание редакторской коллегии
ничего интересного, но неожиданно и приятно. я вот считаю фанфикшен одной из немногих некапитиластических практик для авторов, но и бесконечный ресурс денег для индустрии.
в целом, ловлю ощущение, что вся нынешняя куль…
🔥134❤🔥88❤49💘15🕊2⚡1🍓1🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @x_sonchy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 194%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 30 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“подружка кодзимы / сончи” (@x_sonchy), 13,482 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/x_sonchy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.