Posted without readable text

Channel
HyperOS System Updates (HSU)
@xiaomihsu
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,731subscribers
-96 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002031686924 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xiaomihsu |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xiaomihsu |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 20,731 | -12 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 20,743 | -25 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:56 | 20,768 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:29 | 20,776 | -25 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 20,801 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 20,807 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 20,812 | +6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 20,806 | -17 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 20,823 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 20,832 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 20,846 | -18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 20,864 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 20,865 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 20,864 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 20,868 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 20,863 | +7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 20,856 | +17 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 20,839 | +11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 20,828 | +26 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 20,802 | first reading |
Engagement
278 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.99%
- avg views ÷ 20,731 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 828
- 229 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.322%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 229
- of 278 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 194 of 229 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 278 (7 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 189,649 |
| Reactions total | 537 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 18:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 08s
- Average length
- 21s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
697 reactions across 233 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 486 | 69.7% | |
| 👍 | 102 | 14.6% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 5.45% | |
| 🤯 | 21 | 3.01% | |
| 😢 | 13 | 1.87% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 1.43% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 1.29% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 1.00% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.574% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.43% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 0.287% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.143% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.143% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 237 of the 278 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 697 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 278 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Xiaomi Pad 9 Pro Max in Rich Wine Red Shade 🍒 🍷Unibody Metal Chassis 🍷Minimalist Camera DECO with "XRING" Logo 🍷Racetrack Shaped Silhouette 🍷13.3-inch Large Screen 🔵 @XiaomiHSU
❤1
Xiaomi Pad 9 Pro Max 🍒 ◉ 13.3" Large Display ◉ Ultra Narrow Bezels ◉ XRING O3 💍 ◉ Desktop-level Performance ◉ Compatible with various PC-level applications ◉ HyperOS 4 built specifically for large-screen productivity ◉ Supports Stylus #Xiaomi #XiaomiPad9 🔵 @XiaomiHSU
❤1
Xiaomi 18 Fold ◉ Open the camera for shooting like a classic point-and-shoot camera ◉ External screen with a 4:3 super-large viewfinder ◉ Unfold the External shooting screen for real-time HD preview, Easily adjust your subject's posture ◉ Transform into a professional creative platform ◉ Compatible with professional PC software, providing clear and fast editing on large screens #Xiaomi #Xiaomi18Fold 🔵 @XiaomiHSU
❤2
REDMI 17 is priced ₹3K higher than POCO M8x despite having same specs 6GB/128GB at ₹23,999 8GB/128GB at ₹26,999 - 6.9" 120Hz display - Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 4nm - LPDDR4X + UFS 2.2 - 50MP rear + auxiliary lens - 8MP front - 7,900mAh battery + 45W charging - Dual stereo speakers - RGB light - Up to 2TB microSD - IP64, 5G, Bluetooth 5.1 - 3.5mm jack - HyperOS 3 - Colours: Absolute Black , Endless Blue, Eternal Orange …
❤1
Xiaomi 18 Fold Telephoto Camera samples 50MP (3.5x) Leica Telephoto #Xiaomi #Xiaomi18Fold 🔵 @XiaomiHSU
❤2
Xiaomi 18 Fold Main Camera samples 200MP (1/1.56") Leica Main Camera #Xiaomi #Xiaomi18Fold 🔵 @XiaomiHSU
❤1
Xiaomi 18 Fold ◉ 200MP Leica Main Camera (1/1.56") (OIS) (23mm) f/1.7 ◉ 50MP OV50M UW (1/2.88") (17mm) f/2.4 ◉ 50MP (3.5x) W-shaped Periscope Telephoto (80mm) f/2.8 (JN5) 🤔 ◉ Leica Summilux Lens #Xiaomi #Xiaomi18Fold 🔵 @XiaomiHSU
❤2
Xiaomi 18 Fold ◉ 6000mAh🔋 Xiaomi Jinshajiang Battery ◉ 20% Ultra-high Silicon content ◉ Energy Density of up to 920Wh/L ◉ 67W⚡ Wired Fast Charging ◉ 50W⚡ Wireless Fast Charging #Xiaomi #Xiaomi18Fold 🔵 @XiaomiHSU
❤1
Posted without readable text
Xiaomi 18 Fold 🔵 @XiaomiHSU
❤3
Xiaomi has revealed the design of its upcoming wide-folding smartphone Xiaomi 18 Fold , and this red version looks absolutely stunning. → 5.38-inch cover display → 7.58-inch inner foldable display → Wide-folding design for a more comfortable one-handed cover-screen experience → Xring O3, Xiaomi’s new self-developed 3nm TSMC chip → First foldable to feature Changxin LPDDR6 memory → Leica camera system with Vario-Summ…
❤2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 278 posts we hold for @xiaomihsu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@VikasPalOFFICAL · 37,933
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 31 August 2026
@miuithemevn · 31,440
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 6 September 2026
@HyperOsUpdates · 32,999
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 4 September 2026
@SumitObroyChannel · 34,238
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026
@TECH_MUKUL · 31,237
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 6 September 2026
@miuithemez · 125,584
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 18 August 2026
@MIUI_APK · 55,119
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 23 August 2026
@MiuiSystemUpdater · 75,187
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 August 2026
@xiaomiui · 141,392
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 August 2026
@miui_download · 148,878
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HyperOS System Updates (HSU)” (@xiaomihsu), 20,731 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaomihsu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.