Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 16 days, net -1,025. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 142,761–144,094 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 05:37
142,915
-88
21 Aug 2026, 00:22
143,003
-64
20 Aug 2026, 03:53
143,067
-58
19 Aug 2026, 00:34
143,125
-37
18 Aug 2026, 01:14
143,162
-65
16 Aug 2026, 22:35
143,227
-67
15 Aug 2026, 19:16
143,294
-67
14 Aug 2026, 08:07
143,361
-87
12 Aug 2026, 21:54
143,448
-80
11 Aug 2026, 19:23
143,528
-107
10 Aug 2026, 19:18
143,635
-81
9 Aug 2026, 19:02
143,716
-49
8 Aug 2026, 18:01
143,765
-40
7 Aug 2026, 15:31
143,805
-75
6 Aug 2026, 17:50
143,880
-60
6 Aug 2026, 02:45
143,940
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:39
143,940
first reading
Engagement
99 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.36%
avg views ÷ 142,915 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,800
99 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.441%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
99
of 99 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
99 (1 August 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
475,080
Reactions total
2,095
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,820
Videos
≈301
Links
≈12,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,961 reactions across 92 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
691
35.2%
👍
601
30.6%
🔥
330
16.8%
😁
80
4.08%
🤬
78
3.98%
😢
50
2.55%
👏
44
2.24%
❤🔥
40
2.04%
🤔
14
0.714%
🤷♂
9
0.459%
😱
8
0.408%
🎉
7
0.357%
😍
3
0.153%
👌
2
0.102%
🤷
2
0.102%
🥰
2
0.102%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,095reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 99 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @xiaomiui. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 99 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Xiaomi teases red foldable; new MIX Fold 5 likely in works.
- Wide fold design with XRING O3 chip
- Front camera top-right, transparent variant teased
- China-launch only; official name/date not yet revealed
- Unconfirmed rollout timing, no global date yet 😮
More
Xiaomi 18 edition returns with phased 2026 launch.
- 18 Pro/Pro Max and 18 Fold arrive Sep 2026
- Standard 18 launch likely early 2027
- Codenames: Venice, hongkong, madrid; SD8 Elite Gen 6
- Transparent edition making a comeback
More
Xiaomi releases HyperOS Launcher 8.01.02.5378 bug fixes.
- Focus: stability and bug fixes
- Targets HyperOS 3.1 builds; compatible with some HyperOS 4
- No list of fixed bugs disclosed
- Update via MemeOS Enhancer or MemeOSUpdates.com
More
Qualcomm reveals Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 duo.
- 2nm process introduced: Elite Gen 6 and Elite Extreme Gen 6 - Snapdragon Summit Sept 22-24 in Hawaii - First flagships powered in 2024 by Xiaomi/POCO - Branding shifts to "Elite" vs. prior Gen/Plus
More
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 Pro surfaces with Samsung-style HPB cooling.
- 2nm process, ES chips SM8975-100-BC seen in Dec 2025/Jan 2026 packaging
- LPDDR6 and LPDDR5X support; 1295-ball (LPDDR6) vs 496-ball (LPDDR5X) packages
- Internal HPB heat block confirmed in packaging
- Xiaomi likely first to feature in late 2025/early 2026
More
Qualcomm reveals two Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 chips at Summit.
- Gen 6 and Gen 6 Pro confirmed
- 2nm process expected, efficiency boost
- Antutu Pro leak: ~4.84M points
- Flagships to feature in upcoming Xiaomi/others
More
Xiaomi launches Mijia Light Insulation Cup 2 for about $13.
- 316L stainless steel liner, 500ml
- PPSU filter; four colors
- 68°C tech for 6h, ≤10°C for 6h
- Available on major Chinese platforms; China-only release
More
Xiaomi launches Mijia Pet Water Dispenser 2 Sterilization Edition.
- 99% UV-C sterilization, four-stage filtration
- 3L capacity, 4000mAh battery, up to 90 days
- IPX7, auto shut-off at low water
- China launch end of Aug, app integration via Mijia
More
Note 17 Pro Max slips to entry-tier Snapdragon 6 Gen 5.
- Official unveil Aug 27
- Top Redmi Note line uses lower-tier chip
- Shift tied to chip-supply costs
- Performance impact to be seen at launch 🔍
More
Xiaomi teases September “Great Gathering” launch.
- Event hints at new devices in a unified AI-driven lineup
- Likely Xiaomi 18 Pro and MIX FOLD 5 candidates
- AI, HyperOS 4, XRING O3 tied to the launch
- Xiaomi aims for deep hardware-software integration
More
👍16❤5🎉1😁1
Signed IFTTT
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @xiaomiui. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 26,392 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
HyperOS Updates Download by XiaomiTime @miui_download · 150,157#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
HyperOS Updates Download by XiaomiTime @miui_download · 150,157 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 18 August 2026
Download HyperOS System Updates @MiuiSystemUpdater · 75,095 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 August 2026
Temas & Walls XIAOMI | Ferch Tech 📲 @FerchTechAndroid · 74,168 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 August 2026
FERCH TECH @ferchtech · 100,990 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 18 August 2026
MIUI & HyperOS Themes 🎨 @miuithemez · 125,786 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 18 August 2026
HyperOS Updates | Ferch Tech @ferchtechmsu · 97,194 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 18 August 2026
XTB @XTN_channel · 86,957 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Poco (smartphone)(en.wikipedia.org) “…the series model.{{Cite web|title=Xiaomi's Update Policy|url=https://t.me/xiaomiui/6007|website=telegram|language=en-US}}{{cite web|title=Product…” read 16 August 2026
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“XimiTime: Xiaomi & HyperOS News” (@xiaomiui), 142,915 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xiaomiui.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.