Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 45 days, net -190. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,238–16,498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 11:39
16,273
+5
16 Sept 2026, 23:56
16,268
-12
15 Sept 2026, 01:41
16,280
-8
13 Sept 2026, 07:42
16,288
-9
11 Sept 2026, 11:41
16,297
-20
8 Sept 2026, 20:37
16,317
-17
5 Sept 2026, 15:38
16,334
-14
3 Sept 2026, 12:56
16,348
-7
2 Sept 2026, 05:58
16,355
-8
1 Sept 2026, 04:46
16,363
-5
31 Aug 2026, 06:23
16,368
-4
30 Aug 2026, 06:34
16,372
-11
29 Aug 2026, 04:05
16,383
-7
28 Aug 2026, 03:34
16,390
-5
27 Aug 2026, 03:25
16,395
-13
26 Aug 2026, 02:23
16,408
-7
25 Aug 2026, 03:18
16,415
-3
23 Aug 2026, 19:55
16,418
-9
22 Aug 2026, 02:18
16,427
+4
20 Aug 2026, 21:33
16,423
first reading
Engagement
153 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.50%
avg views ÷ 16,273 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,380
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 153 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 53 of 57 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
153 (1 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
78,844
Reactions total
566
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 53m
Average length
4m 04s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,111 reactions across 138 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
845
40.0%
👍
571
27.0%
👌
240
11.4%
🤣
75
3.55%
💯
66
3.13%
💔
63
2.98%
🔥
58
2.75%
🎉
55
2.61%
😭
44
2.08%
🤬
37
1.75%
👎
33
1.56%
🙏
24
1.14%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 144 of the 153 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
فرض کن تو جای یکی از طرفین این مذاکرهای.طرف مقابل میگه:«اگر این شرایط رو قبول نکنی، توافقی در کار نیست.»تو چه کار میکنی؟
سریع امتیاز میدم تا مذاکره از بین نره.5%
تهدید متقابل میکنم.16%
سکوت میکنم و اطلاعات بیشتری جمع میکنم.29%
یک گزینه جایگزین روی میز میگذارم.57%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
وقتی دو طرف تحت فشارن،
هر دو طرف تهدید میکنن،
هر دو طرف امتیاز میخوان،
و هیچکدوم هم نمیخوان اولین نفر کوتاه بیاد…
این دقیقاً همون جاییه که یک سؤال مهم مطرح میشه:
چه کسی واقعاً قدرت بیشتری داره؟
🆔 @yahyaalavi
کانال رسمی دکتر #یحیی_علوی
ایران بیشتر به چین نیاز دارد یا چین به ایران؟
رابطه اقتصادی ایران و چین نامتقارن است. در سال ۲۰۲۵، تجارت چین با عربستان و امارات حدود ۱۰۸ میلیارد دلار بود؛ درحالیکه تجارت رسمی با ایران تنها ۱۰ میلیارد دلار ثبت شده و با احتساب نفت به حدود ۴۱ میلیارد دلار میرسد.
مسئله مهمتر، تفاوت میزان وابستگی دو کشور است: حدود ۹۰٪ صادرات نفت ایران راهی چین میشود و بخش قابلتوجهی از واردات ایران نیز به چین وابسته است. اما چین گزی…
دوره جدید که به زودی آغاز میشه:
.قدرت مذاکره.
اگه میخوای مذاکره را فقط تئوری یاد نگیری و روی موقعیتهای واقعی تمرین کنی
شماره تماست رو برای من ارسال کن تا اطلاعات کاملش رو داشته باشی👇👇
@ayabssupport
🆔 @yahyaalavi
کانال رسمی دکتر #یحیی_علوی
اگه مذاکره نداشته باشیم، چی میشه؟!
شماره تماست رو برای من ارسال کن تا اطلاعات کاملش رو داشته باشی👇👇
@ayabssupport
🆔 @yahyaalavi
کانال رسمی دکتر #یحیی_علوی
حالا توی همین حوزهای که کار میکنی،
بیشتر سر چه چیزهایی مجبور میشی با آدمها به توافق برسی؟
خرید و قیمت35%
حقوق و شرایط کاری10%
روابطم17%
تقریبا سر همه چی51%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
طبق تحقیق دانشگاه هاروارد، بیش تر از زمانیکه پشت فرمون هستیم، در حال مذاکره ایم ...
پس اگه فکر میکنی یادگیری مذاکره فقط برای مدیران و فروشنده ها و ... است، سخت در اشتباهی
اگه میخوای مذاکره را فقط تئوری یاد نگیری و روی موقعیتهای واقعی تمرین کنی
شماره تماست رو برای من ارسال کن تا اطلاعات کاملش رو داشته باشی👇👇
@ayabssupport
🆔 @yahyaalavi
کانال رسمی دکتر
فکر میکنی بیشترین رشد قیمت خوراکی ها در مرداد کدومه؟
🆔 @yahyaalavi
کانال رسمی دکتر #یحیی_علوی
😭4
Showing the 12 most recent of 153 posts we hold for @yahyaalavi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@yahyaalavi edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
فرض کن تو جای یکی از طرفین این مذاکرهای.طرف مقابل میگه:«اگر این شرایط رو قبول نکنی، توافقی در کار نیست.»تو چه کار میکنی؟
سریع امتیاز میدم تا مذاکره از بین نره.5%
تهدید متقابل میکنم.16%
سکوت میکنم و اطلاعات بیشتری جمع میکنم.29%
یک گزینه جایگزین روی میز میگذارم.57%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
حالا توی همین حوزهای که کار میکنی،
بیشتر سر چه چیزهایی مجبور میشی با آدمها به توافق برسی؟
خرید و قیمت35%
حقوق و شرایط کاری10%
روابطم17%
تقریبا سر همه چی51%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اگر ۱۵ میلیون خانوار خودرو ندارند، مشکل اصلی کجاست؟
خودرو برای مردم گران شده25%
درآمد مردم از قیمت خودرو عقب مانده66%
بازار خودرو از نیاز واقعی مردم فاصله گرفته11%
مردم بهسمت حملونقل عمومی رفتهاند2%
آمارها تصویر دقیقی از واقعیت نمیدهند11%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
کدوم دوره در حال حاضر بیشتر در کسب و کار به کمکت میاد
فروش در رکود51%
بوت کمپ با مدیران15%
قدرت مذاکره48%
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 153 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ایمان سرورپور | روان درمانگر @imansarvarpour_masir_academy · 51,122 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
گاهنامه مدیر(دکتر مهدی صانعی) @gahname_modir · 33,192 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 4 September 2026
قیمت لحظه ای دلارتهران... @tehran_sabza · 26,062 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 13 September 2026
روانشناسی مردان - محمد راد @ravanemard · 56,295 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دکتر یحیی علوی” (@yahyaalavi), 16,273 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yahyaalavi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
