Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Юлия Ястребова | Стиль для реальной жизни

Channel

Юлия Ястребова | Стиль для реальной жизни

@yastrebovaPRO

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

248subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002189827786
TypeChannel
Username@yastrebovaPRO
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yastrebovaPRO

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2452512489 August 2026 — 245 subscribers10 August 2026 — 245 subscribers17 August 2026 — 247 subscribers25 August 2026 — 251 subscribers2 September 2026 — 249 subscribers11 September 2026 — 248 subscribers9 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 244–252 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 02:57248-1
2 Sept 2026, 04:13249-2
25 Aug 2026, 18:53251+4
17 Aug 2026, 23:37247+2
10 Aug 2026, 02:01245no change
9 Aug 2026, 05:16245first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5135.4%
❤4027.8%
👍1510.4%
😍96.25%
🥰85.56%
💯53.47%
😱53.47%
🤣53.47%
😁21.39%
🙏21.39%
⚡10.694%
❤‍🔥10.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC15 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrolog_anastasia_limonova

Юля, ты огонь! Смотрю твой канал и кружочки с разборами украшений. И вот знаю какие мне идут, а к тебе прямо хочу на 12 августа 💞 И да, я тоже сделала 🧘

8 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC21 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Про разницу серег для РАЗНЫХ типажей Вы часто спрашиваете меня: ГДЕ (в каких брендах) выбирать украшения? Дорогие, дело НЕ в брендах! Ответ дам на девичнике 12.08 Записаться: @YuliyaYastrebova

❤2👍2⚡1

8 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC20 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥4❤‍🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 08:28 UTC27 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ты лучше скажи, где ты такой ковер откопала?)))

🤣4💯2

8 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC29 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Помните эти неоновые серьги? Я покупала их для дискотеки 90-х. Тогда мне нужен был яркий акцент тех времен и такие украшения, мягко говоря, не будешь носить часто в 35 лет. Подробный разбор КАК СОСТАВИТЬ ТЕМАТИЧЕСКИЙ ОБРАЗ без ущерба для бюджета - тут. А я снова достаю эти сережки! Завтра танцуем снова в "Третьей Весне"! 🤩 Как думаете, какой дресс-код для такого необычного украшения в этот раз? Подсказка по одн…

❤5🔥3👍2

7 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC35 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Будем говорить об этом на девичнике по УКРАШЕНИЯМ 12.08. Говорить, примерять, смотреть на себя в зеркало! И покупать, если захочется 😉 Запись: @YuliyaYastrebova

🔥5❤2

7 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

В природе существует 15 типажей внешности и только одному из них БЕЗОГОВОРОЧНО идёт "круг". И это самый редкий типаж! И самый женственно-притягательный! Остальным тоже можно, но есть детали формы лица, по которым надо выбирать украшения.

❤4

7 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC37 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня была в гостях в бутике Натали Пермяковой Здесь можно провести диагностику кожи на специальном аппарате. Вас фотографируют специальным образом и аппарат выдаёт очень подробную характеристику: тип кожи, высыпания/воспаления, "будущее" пигментных пятен, повреждения от агрессивного ухода, уровень вашего коллагена и много еще чего. Я узнала свой тип кожи, некоторым показателям удивилась, а некоторым - обрадо…

🔥11❤5👍5

7 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC34 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

📌 #стильный_факт Украшения могут увеличивать лицо (и фигуру) в размерах Если вы хотите похудеть, но носите, например, крупные округлые серьги - визуально они добавляют вам веса. Знали?

❤6😱5🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC41 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Приехала на место, где будет наш девичник по УКРАШЕНИЯМ 12.08. Показываю серьги, как у Евгении, которую вы засыпали комплиментами 🔥 (полный образ - тут) Я сама уже готова купить половину 😍❤️‍🔥 Цены на украшения - в конце кружочка 😉

🔥7❤4👍3

6 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC40 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥6😍4👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @yastrebovaPRO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юлия Ястребова | Стиль для реальной жизни” (@yastrebovaPRO), 248 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yastrebovaPRO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.