Channel
@yinni977
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
713subscribers
-227 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002919229879 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yinni977 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yinni977 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @yinni977/4562 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC | @ML_188/47436 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC | 1.00 | 17 minutes |
| @yinni977/4574 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC | @ML_188/47556 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yinni977/4575 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC | @ML_188/47566 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yinni977/4576 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC | @ML_188/47576 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yinni977/4580 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC | @ML_188/47616 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yinni977/4581 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC | @ML_188/47626 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @ML_188 | 20 (6/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (20–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @yinni977 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 713 | -143 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 856 | -90 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 946 | -69 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 1,015 | +20 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 995 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 992 | +43 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 949 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 940 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
#马来西亚新闻 砂州鳄鱼越来越多！三年22人遇害，当地人直呼不敢靠近河边 马来西亚砂拉越州近年来鳄鱼数量明显回升，官方最新数据显示，2024年当地鳄鱼数量已经突破2.5万只，比几十年前大幅增加。 随着数量增长，人鳄冲突也越来越频繁。统计显示，2023年至2025年期间，当地已有22人因鳄鱼袭击丧命，今年截至目前又新增5起死亡案例，引发社会广泛关注。 据了解，砂拉越州的鳄鱼在上世纪80年代一度因大量捕杀接近绝迹，经过多年保护后数量快速恢复。如今，当局开始面对新的难题——如何在保护野生动物与保障居民安全之间取得平衡。 为了降低风险，砂州政府已经开放发放鳄鱼狩猎许可证，同时推出手机举报平台，方便民众第一时间上报鳄鱼出没地点。相关部门也会联合持证猎人，将靠近村庄或居民区的鳄鱼转移到其他区域。 虽然官方表示，与20年前相比，鳄鱼攻击事件整体并未明显增加，但由于鳄鱼越来越常出现在河边、村庄附近，不少居民已经感到不安。林业部门分析…
#马来西亚新闻 陆兆福辞任民行党森州主席 留任秘书长备战全国大选 马来西亚民主行动党秘书长陆兆福宣布，辞去民行党森美兰州主席职务，为森州选举失利负责，但将继续担任党秘书长，带领民行党备战来届全国大选。 陆兆福星期二在民行党中央执行委员会会议后表示，自己自2004年担任森州主席至今已有22年，是时候退位让贤，让新一代领导层接棒。新任森州主席将由现任中央委员中推选产生。 针对外界关注民行党是否继续留在团结政府，陆兆福表示，这项重大决定将交由8月16日召开的全国特别代表大会，以秘密投票方式决定。 他说，党中央执行委员会已讨论相关课题，但不会提出任何正式立场，以确保所有代表能够独立作出选择，不受党领导层影响。 据了解，民行党中央执行委员会当晚召开特别会议，重点检讨希望联盟及民行党近期接连在沙巴、柔佛和森美兰州选举失利的原因，并商讨未来方向。 近期三场州选中，希盟接连受挫。去年11月沙巴州选，民行党竞选八席全军覆没；今年7月…
#马来西亚新闻 柔森合作模式会全国复制？巫统伊党公开唱反调引关注 马来西亚柔佛州和森美兰州选结束后，国阵与国盟联手大胜，双方未来是否会继续合作，成为外界关注的焦点。 伊斯兰党认为，柔佛和森州的合作模式已经证明有效，希望未来不仅能复制到马六甲州选，甚至延伸到全国大选，进一步扩大双方合作空间。 不过，巫统的态度明显没有那么积极。巫统宣传主任阿莎丽娜表示，每个州的政治环境都不同，合作方式不能一概而论。她举例说，柔佛州选是国阵单独上阵，而森州则选择与国盟合作，未来是否继续合作，还要视各州局势再决定。 与此同时，森州州选失利后的民行党也成为焦点。秘书长陆兆福在深耕22年的真纳州议席意外落败，并表示愿意辞去森州党主席职务，为败选负责。 不过，目前党内多个州领导人，包括森美兰、雪兰莪、柔佛及槟州领袖，纷纷公开表态支持陆兆福继续留任，认为败选并非他一人的责任，也相信他仍有能力带领民行党迎战未来的大选。 分析人士指出，国阵与国盟是否…
#印尼新闻 印尼泰国联手放大招！目标260亿贸易额冲刺东南亚市场 印尼和泰国正式公布最新合作路线图，双方计划在2030年前把双边贸易额提升到200亿美元（约257亿新元），进一步扩大两国在东南亚市场的影响力。 印尼总统普拉博沃日前在雅加达会见到访的泰国首相阿努廷，这也是时隔15年，再次有泰国首相正式访问印尼。双方会后宣布，将围绕经贸、投资、能源、农业、数码经济等多个领域展开更深入合作。 根据双方签署的新路线图，未来几年将重点推动投资便利化、改善市场准入环境，并首次成立印尼和泰国联合贸易委员会，希望减少贸易壁垒，为企业创造更多合作机会。 除了经贸合作，两国还计划加强粮食安全合作，包括农业技术、物流运输、食品加工及供应链建设。同时还会成立能源论坛，推动绿色能源发展，并扩大本币结算，降低跨境贸易成本，提高交易效率。 阿努廷表示，两国拥有超过3.5亿人口的大市场，未来合作空间非常大，对实现贸易目标充满信心。 普拉博沃则认为…
#马来西亚新闻 吉隆坡机场毒品案暴增，今年已破百宗创新高 马来西亚警方透露，今年截至7月底，吉隆坡国际机场已经查获108宗毒品走私案件，比去年同期足足增加一倍，机场毒品走私问题再次引发关注。 警方数据显示，今年累计查获约1350公斤毒品，市值高达1亿835万令吉，和去年相比，无论数量还是价值都暴涨近5倍。落网嫌犯也从去年的57人增加到121人，其中包括不少外国籍人士。 警方调查发现，大部分毒品并非在马来西亚制造，而是先从周边国家流入，再经海路或陆路运往马来西亚北部，随后有约八成继续转运至其他国家，尤其是欧洲市场，其中大麻花需求增长明显。 为了堵住漏洞，警方目前正联合交通部、机场管理单位等部门升级机场安检，加强旅客及货物检查，防止毒品继续借道马来西亚流向海外。 另外，警方日前也在吉隆坡国际机场破获一起大型毒品案，一次行动逮捕15名嫌犯，查获大麻花、冰毒、可卡因以及大量装有摇头丸液体的电子烟烟弹，总价值约4200万令吉。
校园惊现新型毒电子烟，议员投诉彻查学生吸食魔幻电子烟乱象 8月5日，马来西亚山打根出现校园涉毒乱象，当地州议员邓靖强向警方肃毒组投诉，网传视频曝光有学生吸食含“飘飘”“魔幻蘑菇”的新型毒电子烟。这类伪装普通电子烟的产品含精神活性物质，悄然在学生群体蔓延，严重威胁青少年身心健康与校园安全。 议员已对接警方跟进调查，要求查清涉事人员、电子烟成分，深挖供货、销售黑链，重点打击向未成年人售毒的不法分子。同时实地走访巴士总站，排查学生聚集高危区域，建议多方加强巡逻管控，联动家校社会合力遏制新型毒品蔓延。
#马来西亚新闻 电动车销量暴涨，东南亚车市迎来大洗牌 东南亚汽车市场正在迎来新变化，电动车销量一路飙升，不仅中国品牌持续发力，马来西亚和越南本土品牌也开始快速崛起，市场竞争越来越激烈。 数据显示，今年第二季度，在印尼、马来西亚和泰国带动下，东南亚汽车销量同比增长约11%。其中，印尼卖出22万多辆汽车，同比大涨34%，成为区域内增长最快的市场之一。 电动车成为最大的推动力。随着各国补贴政策和消费者接受度提高，比亚迪、Jaecoo等品牌销量持续走高，占据了不少市场份额。印尼政府也表示，未来几周还会推出新的税收优惠，继续刺激电动车和电动摩托车销售。 马来西亚方面，本土品牌宝腾表现十分抢眼。今年上半年，电动车销量同比暴涨106%，首次超过混动车。其中，宝腾推出的e.MAS系列直接包揽当地销量前两名，占全国电动车市场约43%的份额。 越南本土品牌VinFast同样势头强劲，今年前五个月销量接近10万辆，继续稳坐越南汽车销量冠军…
#吉隆坡国际机场1号航站楼升级电召车设施 主要引入了车牌辨识系统、自助服务终端机以及专属乘客候车区。每辆进入主航站楼接客的电召车须缴付3令吉服务费，停留超过10分钟将面临罚款。 1.设施升级重点 车牌辨识系统：与乘客资讯显示系统全面整合。 自助服务终端机：方便乘客快速办理相关乘车手续。 专属候车区：提供更有序的接载空间。 2.收费与规则 入场服务费：每辆授权电召车须缴付 3令吉。 3.时间限制：车辆停留超过 10分钟 将被罚款。
#资源政策 #产业合作 #印尼经济 顺差终止与镍矿迷思：印尼如何“逼走”十年的合作伙伴？ 连续72个月的贸易顺差，在2026年画上了句号。印尼连续两个月逆差，转折的核心线索指向镍矿——那个十年前靠中国资本和技术才起飞的产业。当初中国出钱、出技术、带市场，帮印尼建起了完整的镍产业链，双方各取所需。可产业链成熟后，印尼政策急转：收紧配额、调整定价、加税费，压缩中国投资者空间，试图转向印度填补空缺。结果却是：中国撤了，印度来了，但生产线没来。项目规模收缩，顺差随之消失。这不是外部冲击造成的被动调整，而是政策选择带来的主动断裂。印尼想摆脱“资源出口国”标签，却在追求附加值的过程中忽视了合作伙伴的价值。这场逆差的代价，是十年合作积累的信任和效率换来的教训——资源民族主义可以赢得掌声，但无法替代生产线上的技术和效率。顺差消失，不是市场惩罚印尼，而是合作伙伴用脚投票的结果。
#企图运87公斤冰毒到大马3大马人在合艾火车站被捕 3名大马公民在行李箱和背包内藏匿87公斤冰毒，试图将毒品运送进入马来西亚，昨日在泰国合艾被当地警方逮捕。 这三名嫌犯是在乘坐火车从泰国曼谷前往合艾，在三个拉杆行李箱和三个双肩背包中，发现了87公斤的晶体脱氧麻黄碱（俗称冰毒），价值约430万令吉。 初步调查显示，这三人受雇将冰毒运送给马来西亚贩毒集团，每人分别获得8000令吉，作为将毒品运送至指定地点的报酬。
#马来西亚新闻：第三届教科文组织创意城市网络美食之都年会4日在古晋开幕，恰逢砂拉越总理阿邦佐哈里76岁生日，现场两度响起生日歌送上祝福。 本届大会汇集25国近200名代表，围绕美食文旅与城市可持续发展展开研讨交流。作为古晋获评美食之都后的重磅国际活动，此次年会借美食文化搭建跨国合作平台，展示当地多元饮食特色，助力提升砂拉越国际知名度，为城市间的文化交流与可持续发展注入新活力。
公职人员虚报住房补贴致国家损失36亿印尼盾 8月5日，印尼波诺罗戈地区检察官办公室官宣侦破一起重大贪腐案件。当地人民民主革命委员会秘书处财务部门负责人被列为涉案嫌疑人，涉嫌在2023至2026年间违规操作议员住房补贴项目，恶意篡改补贴核算标准，套取公共资金。 该案最终造成国家财政损失高达36亿印尼盾。目前嫌疑人已被控制，办案团队正深挖资金流向、彻查全链条涉案人员，持续推进案件侦办工作。
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yinni977. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 21 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“印尼马来 新闻🌎” (@yinni977), 713 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yinni977.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.