Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 40 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,627–13,672 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 06:55
13,639
-12
15 Sept 2026, 06:39
13,651
-16
13 Sept 2026, 17:16
13,667
+3
12 Sept 2026, 01:56
13,664
+16
9 Sept 2026, 18:16
13,648
-2
6 Sept 2026, 13:38
13,650
-8
4 Sept 2026, 03:40
13,658
+1
31 Aug 2026, 17:03
13,657
+1
30 Aug 2026, 18:55
13,656
-2
27 Aug 2026, 18:19
13,658
-5
26 Aug 2026, 18:43
13,663
+5
25 Aug 2026, 17:52
13,658
-2
24 Aug 2026, 16:45
13,660
+6
23 Aug 2026, 02:07
13,654
-3
21 Aug 2026, 15:37
13,657
+5
20 Aug 2026, 15:43
13,652
-7
19 Aug 2026, 17:53
13,659
+9
18 Aug 2026, 17:17
13,650
+4
16 Aug 2026, 17:37
13,646
+1
15 Aug 2026, 00:56
13,645
first reading
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.95%
avg views ÷ 13,639 subscribers
Avg views / post
402
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
71 (4 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
10,850
Reactions total
333
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
23m 01s
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
585 reactions across 58 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
270
46.2%
🔥
218
37.3%
👍
45
7.69%
😁
25
4.27%
😢
11
1.88%
🎉
7
1.20%
🥰
6
1.03%
😱
2
0.342%
custom 5352871788873271579
1
0.171%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 585 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Запускаем процесс жиросжигания 🔥
Обязательно забирайте комплекс! Первые результаты будут заметны уже через несколько недель 💪
Упражнения направлены на:
• Стимуляцию кровообращения в проблемных зонах
• Активизацию работы яичников и щитовидной железы
• Укрепление мышц кора, улучшения осанки
Кто выполнил, делитесь ощущениями в комментариях 👇
👉 Если вам кажется, что диеты и тренировки не дают результата
👉 Если вы худ…
⏰ Кажется, что 15 минут ничего не изменят…
Но именно ежедневные 15-20 минут обеспечат вам:
• подтянутый живот без отеков
• просыпаться без ощущения, что «всё тело затекло и разваливается»
• спокойно наклониться, завязать шнурки
• подтянутую гладкую кожу
• подтянутые руки и ягодицы
• оргазмичность и либидо
Такой эффект дают именно регулярные занятия.
Сегодня и завтра 15 минут. В месяц это 7,5 часов. А за год это бо…
Знаете, как заставить ребенка МЕЧТАТЬ о школе и бежать туда с криками «ура»? Очень просто 👇
Переехать в Москву за месяц до 1 сентября.
🤪Всё, что мы слышим уже вторую неделю — это не «не хочу учиться», а «когда мы уже пойдем?». Мы оформили регистрацию, две школы нам отказали по причине «нет мест», и теперь наши дети продлевают свои каникулы.
Но нет, они не рады. Они хотят форму, белые банты и букеты. Они хотят стоя…
В этом сообщении прекрасно все…
Листала тредс и наткнулась на такую ветку и вижу как многие отправляют сразу женщин в зал или групповые тренировки. Но это фатальная ошибка!
Поэтому хочу раскрыть эту тему у себя в блоге 👇
➡️ Во-первых, никогда не поздно начинать! Да, это так.
Пусть вам 30, 40, 50, 60, да хоть 80 лет. Начать заниматься своим телом можно, даже если вы до этого никогда ничего не делали и систематическ…
Доброе утро, девочки!
Всех с началом новой недели, а всем мама школьников приготовиться 📚😂
Мамы школьников, готовы к 1 сентября?
♥️ - да
🔥- всегда готова
😔 - нет
Обо всех позаботились. А о себе опять забыли?
Последние недели все мамы страны погрузились в традиционную августовскую суету 🌪️
Вышли из отпуска, подготовили детей к школе, купили форму, канцелярию, записали на кружки.
А О СЕБЕ ПОДУМАЛИ?
Сейчас начнётся: утром всех разбудить, собрать, отвезти. Днём работа и миллион своих дел. Вечером забрать, накормить, сделать уроки, развести по секциям.
И только втянулись — бац…
Продолжаю знакомить вас с участницами реалити ✨
Сегодня в гостях Александра. Обязательно поставьте ей 🔥 за смелость и желание менять себя!
Запрос Александры — избавиться от отёков, постройнеть и сделать тело более упругим.
Мой подробный разбор и рекомендации смотрите в карточках выше 👆Там я объясняю, почему регулярные занятия в тренажёрном зале и дефицит калорий сами по себе не всегда помогают получить желаемую фи…
У меня совершенно нет времени на себя…
Признайтесь, знакомые мысли?
У всех работа, дедлайны, совещания, огороды, а скоро ещё и дети пойдут в школу, и ко всему прочему добавятся домашние задания и внезапные ночные поделки из палок и шишек
🫠И где-то между всем этим желательно вспомнить, что у вас вообще-то тоже есть тело, которому нужен сон, движение и восстановление.
Но как показывает практика, вспоминаем мы о с…
Ежедневный утренний ритуал 💪
Рассказывайте в комментариях, с чего началось сегодня ваше утро ☀️
🔥9👍4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @yogaroggelin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Стань краше с Орловой Дашей - Даша Орлова @vasha_orlovadasha · 38,381 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЙОГА РОГГЕЛИН | ОКСАНА РОГГЕЛИН” (@yogaroggelin), 13,639 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yogaroggelin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.