Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for یوتیوبرکده (آموزش کسب درآمد از یوتیوب و هوش مصنوعی)

Channel

یوتیوبرکده (آموزش کسب درآمد از یوتیوب و هوش مصنوعی)

@youtuberkade

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,481subscribers

+51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001597761000
TypeChannel
Username@youtuberkade
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/youtuberkade

Growth

8,4308,4818,455.57 August 2026 — 8,430 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,433 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,442 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,462 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,461 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,468 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,457 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,460 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,465 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,471 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,481 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net +51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,422–8,489 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 23:408,481+10
2 Sept 2026, 12:158,471+6
30 Aug 2026, 21:528,465+5
27 Aug 2026, 20:538,460+3
24 Aug 2026, 13:128,457-11
21 Aug 2026, 00:058,468+7
17 Aug 2026, 16:078,461-1
14 Aug 2026, 07:158,462+20
11 Aug 2026, 01:578,442+9
8 Aug 2026, 03:018,433+3
7 Aug 2026, 16:028,430first reading

Engagement

52 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 8,481 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,280
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.902%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 52 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held52 (22 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total39,691
Reactions total358
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11m 19s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

664 reactions across 49 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30245.5%
👍9614.5%
💔649.64%
🔥416.17%
👏365.42%
🙏223.31%
🤯223.31%
🥰223.31%
😢203.01%
😱81.20%
👌71.05%
😨60.904%
💯40.602%
🕊40.602%
😍30.452%
🤩30.452%
10.151%
🆒10.151%
🎉10.151%
🤗10.151%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 664 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC528 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

بچه ها این آپدیت شروع شده ها! حواستون باشه غافلگیر نشین.

👍3💔1😢1

26 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC722 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#آپدیت_یوتیوب 🎬 یوتیوب قبل از انتشار Shorts به سازنده‌ها بازخورد میده! یوتیوب قابلیت جدیدی به نام Get Feedback معرفی کرده که به سازنده‌های Shorts کمک می‌کنه قبل از انتشار ویدیو، اون رو بررسی و در صورت نیاز بهترش کنن. برای استفاده، وقتی Short رو آماده کردی، اون رو به‌صورت Unlisted آپلود کن و در YouTube Studio گزینه Get Feedback رو انتخاب کن. یوتیوب با بررسی ویدیو، درباره بخش‌هایی مثل شروع ویدیو (Hook)، ریتم و سرعت

👍103🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC786 views24 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

تو بعضی ویدیوها چنان خلاقیتی هست که دلت میخواد فقط تماشاچی باشی! ساخته شده با Seedance 2.5 @Youtuberkade

🔥166👌1👏1

25 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC870 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

هرچی اسکرول میکنم فقط کامنت خوبه واسه من یه دنیا ارزش داره بچه ها ممنونم ازتون🌺🙏😊😘

🥰93🔥3👏1😨1🙏1

25 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC840 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

بالاخره استوری این کانالم باز شد. مرسی از همه کسایی که به من لطف داشتن و همکاری کردن🙏🌺😊

9🔥2

25 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC875 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026

بچه‌ها کسی میدونه درحال حاضر چطوری میشه از تراست ولت برداشت کرد؟

👍7😨2🎉1

23 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈1,100 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🚀بچه ها ممنون میشم اگر Telegram Premium دارید، کانالامو Boost کنید💜 هرچی تعداد Boostهای کانال بیشتر بشه، Level کانال بالاتر میره و میتونم اینجا استوری بیشتری بذارم.⚡️ 🔗 وارد این لینک بشید، بعدم روی دکمه Boost بزنید👇 https://t.me/boost/youtuberkade ممنون که با Boost‌هاتون حمایت می‌کنید. پس بوس به کَلَتون😘🌸

6

23 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC≈1,310 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🎥 یوتیوب سیستم شمارش ویو را دستکاری کرد! (این آپدیت چه بلایی سر آمار کانالت میاره؟) بعد از آپدیت اخیر یوتیوب درباره تغییر شرایط درآمدزایی این دومین آپدیت پوچیه که این اواخر از یوتیوب دیدم! تغییر روش محاسبه تعداد ویوها!😒 توی این ویدیو بررسی می‌کنیم Public View جدید یوتیوب دقیقاً چطور محاسبه می‌شه، چه فرقی با Engaged View داره و این آپدیت چه تأثیری روی درآمد، Monetization، آنالیتیکس و رشد کانال می‌ذاره. در آخر هم می

7

22 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC≈1,240 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026

بالاخره منتشر شد! با هزار مکافات

14

22 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC≈1,240 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

همچنان درحال آپلود ویدیو!!🫤😑

4

22 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC≈1,130 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🆕⚡️ امشب یه ویدیوی جدید داریم درباره آپدیت یوتیوب درباره روش جدید شمارش تعداد ویوها! اونایی که به اتفاقات بصورت سطحی نگاه نمیکنن و دنبال فهمیدن دلیل هراتفاق جدیدن و میخوان هر تغییری رو بصورت تحلیلی و دقیق بفهمن این ویدیو خیلی به دردشون میخوره.✅ من توی این ویدیو نیومدم فقط بهتون بگم آپدیت چیه و تمام! بلکه توضیح کامل دربارش دادم و تحلیل کردم که از این آپدیت هم چطوری میتونیم بنفع خودمون استفاده کنیم.💡 منتظر ویدیوی ام

11🙏4

22 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC≈1,150 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

بچه ها خیلی پیام دادین در این مورد. یه خورده صبوری کنین جواب میدم به همتون. امروز سرم شلوغه

8🙏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @youtuberkade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@youtuberkade edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

آموزش یوتیوب و اپارات با فرنوش دهستانی
@youtubeexpertpart1 · 43,191
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
نیما نیکخواه | یوتیوب گرام 💎
@YouTube_Graam · 148,371
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 August 2026
هوش مصنوعی در پژوهش
@AI_in_Research · 257,584
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“یوتیوبرکده (آموزش کسب درآمد از یوتیوب و هوش مصنوعی)” (@youtuberkade), 8,481 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/youtuberkade.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.