اگه از قطعی زیاد vpn خسته شدی پیشنهاد میکنم اینو یبار امتحان کنی ، محدودیت تعداد کاربر نداره و حجم واقعی میدیم و با کیفیت! 🎁 کلمه « تست » رو برامون بفرست تا اشتراک رایگان بگیری: ➡️ @Etminannet_Support ➡️ @Etminannet_Support

Channel
نیما نیکخواه | یوتیوب گرام 💎
@YouTube_Graam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
148,371subscribers
+305 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001657838882 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @YouTube_Graam |
| Description | اگه میخای از یوتیوب به درآمد دلاری برسی همراه من باش ! ارتباط و پشتیبانی : 👤 @Youtube_supp0rt تعرفه تبلیغات : 🔗 @adsYTube خدمات یوتیوب گرام : @Youtube_khadamat |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/YouTube_Graam |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 148,371 | -110 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:54 | 148,481 | +34 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:04 | 148,447 | -70 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:53 | 148,517 | -18 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 148,535 | -107 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 148,642 | -66 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 148,708 | -39 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 148,747 | -44 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 148,791 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 148,792 | -75 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 148,867 | -30 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 148,897 | -86 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 148,983 | +50 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 148,933 | -15 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 148,948 | +47 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 148,901 | -25 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 148,926 | +19 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 148,907 | -49 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 148,956 | -164 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 149,120 | first reading |
Engagement
245 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.39%
- avg views ÷ 148,371 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,070
- 187 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 187
- of 245 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 245 (2 August 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 386,490 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 05:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈9,130
- Videos
- ≈273
- Links
- ≈1,080
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
چرا شورت ویدئوها بازدیدهای خیلی بیشتری نسبت به لانگ ها میگیرن؟ ⏳ ویدئوهای کوتاه، به ویژه شورتز، فرصتی عالی برای جذب مخاطبهای جدید هستند 🧨 چرا اینقدر محبوب شدن؟ چرا باید بیشتر به ویدئوهای کوتاه اهمیت بدی؟ 📱 تماشای راحتتر مخاطبها وقتی وقت کم دارن، ترجیح میدن به جای ویدئوهای طولانی، ویدئوهای کوتاه رو تماشا کنن. 📊 جلب توجه سریعتر تو شورتز، همهچیز باید سریع و مختصر باشه ، این یعنی مخاطب خیلی زود جذب میشه و احتمال…
ویدئوهات رو با یه داستان شروع کن! 📖 یکی از بهترین روشها برای جذب مخاطب از همون ابتدا اینه که ویدئوت رو با یک داستان یا اتفاق جالب شروع کنی، نه اینکه از همون اول خودت رو معرفی کنی 🧨 چرا شروع با داستان اینقدر مهمه؟ 💡 جلب توجه مخاطبان از اول ویدئو وقتی یه داستان جذاب شروع میکنی، مخاطب ناخودآگاه جذب میشه و میخواد بدونه ادامه داستان چطور پیش میره!! 🎯 ایجاد ارتباط احساسی و درگیر کردن احساسات مخاطب ها مخاطبها بیش…
⭕️اختلال اینترنت کشور برطرف شد 🔸 معاون وزیر ارتباطات: قطعی فیبر نوری در ارمنستان که پیشتر موجب کندی اینترنت در ایران شده بود، ساعت ۰۰:۵۵ بامداد برطرف شد. 💰@YouTube_Graam
🔎 کلمات کلیدی رو توی خود یوتیوب پیدا کن! خیلیا میرن اشتراک ابزارها و برنامه پیچیده و گرون رو میخرن که فقط بفهمن مردم دنبال چی میگردن 🤯 ولی باورت میشه خود یوتیوب رایگان اینو بهت نشون میده؟! 😎 👊 روشی که میگم خیلی سادهست: برو توی بخش سرچ و یه کلمهی کلی تایپ کن (مثلاً فوتبال) قبل اینکه اینتر بزنی، پیشنهادهایی که یوتیوب میاره رو ببین 👀 همونا همون چیزاییان که آدمها واقعاً سرچ میکنن 🔥 📌 مثلا: اگر تایپ کنی کسب در…
⚡️ به جای شنیدن تعریف، خودت امتحان کن! قبل از خرید اشتراک، سرعت یوتیوب و اینستاگرام رو روی اینترنت خودت چک کن. 🎁 کلمه « تست » رو برامون بفرست تا اشتراک رایگان بگیری: ➡️ @Etminannet_Support ➡️ @Etminannet_Support
🧨 آپلود ویدئو به صورت روزانه لازم نیست!! یکی از کارهای سخت و طاقت فرسا توی یوتیوب این هستش که شما هر روز ویدئو بذارید 🔮 بعضیا فکر میکنند که آپلود روزانه باعث میشه سریعتر و بهتر پیشرفت کنند و به نتیجه دلخواه برسند درحالی که اینطور نیست 🪫 برخی از موضوع ها هستن که دیلی آپلود به هیچ وجه براشون مناسب نیست ⏳ 💡 تعدادی از موضوعات هستند که لازمه شما تعداد ویدئوهای کمی رو در هفته منتشر کنید تا رشد بهتری داشته باشید چون م…
تازه میخوای وارد یوتیوب بشی و کلی سوال تو ذهنت داری؟ حتی اگه فکر میکنی سوالت خیلی ساده یا پیشپاافتادهست، اصلاً خجالت نکش! بیا ازمون بپرس تا با حوصله راهنماییت کنیم 🤍👇 آیدی پشتیبانی: 🆔 @Youtube_supp0rt 🆔 @Youtube_supp0rt
⏳ توی تامنیل ها از چهرهات استفاده کن!! یکی از چیزهایی که باعث میشه مخاطب توی همون نگاه اول با ویدئوت ارتباط بگیره، دیدن چهرهته 👌 چهره انسان یه ابزار قویه برای انتقال احساس، هیجان یا حتی شوک 📺 💣 وقتی مخاطب یه چهره واقعی با یه حالت احساسی خاص میبینه، سریعتر با ویدئو ارتباط برقرار میکنه و احتمال کلیک بیشتر میشه!! تامنیلهای بدون چهره ممکنه حرفهای به نظر برسن، اما معمولاً نرخ کلیک پایینتری دارن چون اون حس انسا…
🚨 یکی از بزرگترین اشتباههای افراد تازهکار توی یوتیوب!! خیلی از کسانی که تازه وارد یوتیوب میشن، فکر میکنن برای رشد سریع باید همهچیز رو از همون اول عالی انجام بدن ❌ به همین دلیل یا اصلا شروع نمیکنن یا بعد از چند ویدئو ناامید میشن 👌 💡 یوتیوب جایی نیست که از روز اول بهترین باشید؛ این یه مسیر یادگیریه. شما باید با آزمون و خطا جلو برید، اشتباه کنید، تجربه کسب کنید و کمکم کیفیت کارتون رو بالا ببرید!! یکی دیگه از ا…
اگه از قطعی زیاد vpn خسته شدی پیشنهاد میکنم یبار خدمات مارو امتحان کنی ، محدودیت تعداد کاربر نداره و حجم واقعی میدیم و با کیفیت! 🎁 کلمه « تست » رو برامون بفرست تا اشتراک رایگان بگیری: ➡️ @Etminannet_Support ➡️ @Etminannet_Support
💡 یه دفعه با تجربه نمیشید!! خیلی از افراد تصور دارن که از همون اول خیلی سریع تجربه لازم رو میتونن مسب کنن واسه همین باید در کمترین مدت زمان ممکن به درآمد برسن ❌ این تصور فقط باعث میشه که شما نتونید به چیزی که میخواید برسید ⚠️ 💡 بدون شک شما در اولین تجربههای فعالیت توی یوتیوب یکسری مسیرا رو اشتباه میرید که باعث میشه زمان رسیدن به مانیتایز تون بیشتر بشه که خب به دلیل کمبود تجربه موردی کاملا عادیه!! اصلا در صورتی ک…
Showing the 12 most recent of 245 posts we hold for @YouTube_Graam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اولین قدم برای شروع فعالیت در یوتیوب چیه؟
- خرید دوربین حرفهای 📸3%
- ساخت اکانت گوگل و کانال یوتیوب 🔮70%
- یاد گرفتن ادیت حرفهای 🥣17%
- رسیدن به ۱۰۰۰ سابسکرایب 📉10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 245 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@YoutubershoTo · 10,840#1
@SaTubeNews · 7,485#2
@roidbest · 1,651,782#3
@ostadshow_com · 7,676#4
@zigzagnetworkfa · 8,098#5
@youtubershocourse · 14,799#6
@youtuberkade · 8,481#7
@zinonetworkfa · 735#8
@youtubersho · 12,483#9
@MasterTubeVIP · 2,391#10
@CafeYoutube · 1,490#11
@amookashani · 124,962#12
@zotpo · 145,465#13
@ITSecurityComputer · 177,752#14
@farzad_berices · 378,172#15
@packageyoutube · 3,013 (as read 28 August 2026)#16
@putakk · 218,245#17
@editorsho123 · 1,071#18
@tarqand · 2,443#19
@Comentiat · 382,974#20
@doreyoutube · 5,220#21
@Amir_graf · 14,065#22
@GOLDVSBTC1 · 44,282#23
@Farda_Ai · 761,885#24
@iospanicyt · 9,151#25
@tajvizAngize · 305,997#26
@amoo_thumbs · 1,709#27
@safariediting · 219#28
@LearnooTime · 1,485#29
@kasbokar_tme · 2,131#30
@Thumologist · 291#31
@iFutureAI · 43,515#32
@DARK_ARROWARTWORK · 3,182#33
@ZetaTech_iR2 · 24,008#34
@barak_academi · 7,984#35
@iMTProto · 7,484,600#36
@iRoProxy · 7,896,307#37
@futballbadtv · 323,491#38
@RegaPlus · 1,466,458#39
@razcom · 1,237,225#40
@varzesh3 · 1,294,838#41
@CottageOrg · 806,929#42
@skillvid · 13,383#43
@danialzhpersian · 805#44
@darkproxy · 4,797,512#45
@vigiatonet · 82,863#46
@gamotionart · 102,939#47
@myzoomg · 85,635#48
@matin_sajadiiiii · 4,569#49
@thezoomit · 130,441#50
@wbnet · 229,421#51
@Digiato · 112,462#52
@Satoshi_GOLD_BTC · 83,779#53
@animotionart · 497,902#54
@wallpaper_4k3d · 562,158#55
@rapcity · 80,572#56
@jabebazar_youtube · 2,851#57
@Cyrus_Graphic · 9,452#58
@Design_Sparks · 2,552#59
@GameNixor · 13,995#60
@Fweeter · 62,751#61
@gamebadnews · 105,926#62
@Afkar · 1,023,246#63
@pendareparsi · 16,337#64
@Projectselyasi · 6,002#65
@TAHA_ARTWORK · 18,718#66
@Zod_Design · 1,001#67
@tarhemajazi · 8,612#68
@friends_MiM · 65#69
@GraphicKhazer · 12,929#70
@mArtwork001 · 2,140#71
@poniz_artwork1 · 2,353#72
@CCina_Design · 65,574#73
@pijexedit · 196#74
@AI_persian1 · 3,152#75
@proxymtproto · 11,950,489#76
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@youtubeexpertpart1 · 43,191
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نیما نیکخواه | یوتیوب گرام 💎” (@YouTube_Graam), 148,371 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YouTube_Graam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.