Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for RASHEV

Channel

RASHEV

@yrashev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,283subscribers

-136 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001142691843
TypeChannel
Username@yrashev
Created31 May 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yrashev

Growth

16,28316,41916,3516 August 2026 — 16,419 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,419 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,417 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,415 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,408 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,405 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,403 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,400 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,398 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,389 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,384 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,381 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,380 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,379 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,377 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,372 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,366 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,363 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,357 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,354 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,343 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,339 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,336 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,329 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,326 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,317 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,316 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,314 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,302 subscribers6 September 2026 — 16,283 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 31 days, net -136. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,263–16,439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 09:0016,283-19
4 Sept 2026, 04:4016,302-12
2 Sept 2026, 18:0916,314-2
1 Sept 2026, 15:3616,316-1
31 Aug 2026, 18:4816,317-9
30 Aug 2026, 20:5316,326-3
29 Aug 2026, 17:1516,329-7
28 Aug 2026, 17:1816,336-3
27 Aug 2026, 20:2616,339-4
26 Aug 2026, 19:0316,343-11
25 Aug 2026, 21:2516,354-3
24 Aug 2026, 21:1316,357-6
23 Aug 2026, 05:0916,363-3
21 Aug 2026, 17:3816,366-6
20 Aug 2026, 17:5316,372-5
19 Aug 2026, 18:5216,377-2
18 Aug 2026, 19:2416,379-1
17 Aug 2026, 22:3816,380-1
16 Aug 2026, 19:1716,381-3
15 Aug 2026, 07:3516,384first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.2%
avg views ÷ 16,283 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,050
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held25 (15 May 202625 August 2026)
Views total30,270
Reactions total562
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,304 reactions across 25 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,37632.0%
👍56213.1%
😁49411.5%
🤣3668.50%
🔥2996.95%
💩2415.60%
🤡1994.62%
💯1513.51%
🤔1413.28%
👏912.11%
👎581.35%
💊581.35%
❤‍🔥380.883%
🤮260.604%
🖕250.581%
🏆240.558%
220.511%
😭200.465%
🤷‍♂180.418%
🤯140.325%
19 further kinds811.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,304 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 25 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yrashev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 May 2026 to 25 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC≈3,310 views51 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://youtu.be/nllmm7Q4sj0?is=RyIbb3b6sXo3RuMv Самая казахская песня на свете.

🤣25💩16🤔4🤡32🔥1

14 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC≈7,610 views99 reactions3 Starsread 3 September 2026

Кто-то явно не хочет чтобы на стадионе "Кайрата" прозвучала песня "Nigga Heil Hitler".

😁7314💩7🔥2🥴2💯1

14 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC≈8,960 views187 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Канье в Алматы Вообще хип-хоп как жанр - это музыка для детей и тинейджеров. После определенного возраста (у кого-то раньше, у кого-то позже) тебя перестают интересовать все эти выебоны, тачки, сучки, криминальная романтика и прочие атрибуты показной крутизны. Темы для песен у рэп-исполнителей довольно ограничены. Потому что юность сама по себе ограничена. Канье как раз интересен тем, что он уже не молод и даже не

120🔥30👍17💩7🤣73🤮2🤡1

13 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈5,830 views179 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Midi Кстати я же летом проехался по югу Франции, подальше от эксплуатируемых гламурными нуворишами Канн и Сен-Тропе, и поближе к маленьким провансальским и камаргским деревушкам облюбованным бедным и несчастным Винсентом Ван Гогом в конце 19 века - Ним, Арль, Сен-Реми, Ле-Бо, Эг-Морт, Сен-Мари-де-ля-мер. Несчастный человек ведь только и делает, что вечно думает о счастье. Что тут скажешь? Прав Ван Гог, права певица

13713👏10👍5🤔5💩4💯4🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈4,560 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

31🔥6🤩5❤‍🔥4

31 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC≈7,080 views178 reactionsread 3 September 2026

В старом порту Марселя Первыми в эту гавань приплыли финикийцы 3000 лет назад. Затем древние греки. Затем римляне. Византийцы, арабы, норманны - все использовали порт Марселя в качестве важнейшего торгового и военного хаба. А король-солнце Людовик XIV превратил его в неприступную крепость. Правда почти разрушенную американскими бомбами 300 лет спустя. Порт заново отстроили наркокартели (см. фильм «Французский связно

👍82🔥4441💩5🤡2🌭1👎1👏1

31 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC≈5,850 views57 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍3412💩6🖕4🍌1

29 Jul 2026, 10:12 UTC≈6,890 views289 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026

Политропос Ну и последнее - к “Одиссее” нужно относиться не как к мифу, фэнтэзи или приключенческому роману, а как к практическому пособию по квесту сквозь жизнь, особенно если тебя прокляли боги. В этом смысле она больше похожа на компьютерную игру. Каждый эпизод ставит перед Одиссеем разные задачи требующие разных навыков. Циклоп - о том как перехитрить и победить более сильного соперника (босса, чиновника) при п

178🔥59👏26💯15👍6💩4🖕1

28 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC≈7,850 views280 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Серый мир Нолана Посмотрел “Одиссею” Нолана. Несколько мыслей. Я давно повторяю что Нолан хороший, но абсолютно невыдающийся режиссер. Он снимает интересные экшн-фильмы, но не шедевры. То же самое с “Одиссеей”. На один раз пойдет, однако пересматривать эту технически совершенную, но неглубокую сумятицу вряд ли захочется. Большие кассовые сборы еще ни о чем не говорят - Джеймс Камерон снял аж три фильма про синих ин

151🔥51👏31🤡14💩12👎76😁4

9 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTC≈9,460 views263 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

Как так получилось что сборная Марокко белее чем сборная Франции?

😁152🤣86💩944😭4🤡3🤓1

7 Jul 2026, 09:19 UTC≈10,200 views235 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Наконец-то до всех дошло зачем в Казахстане поменяли конституцию.

🤣129👍49🤡23🤯14🤔9😁53👎2

1 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC≈13,500 views76 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Дождь на Сицилии.

46💩14🤡11🖕3💊2

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @yrashev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gromov Opinion
@gromovproject · 36,688
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
Yerzhan Yessimkhanov
@YerzhanY · 32,077
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
ALIBEKOV
@alibekovkz · 54,394
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
👨🏻‍💻/ Марат Юсупов
@maratyus · 106,256
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RASHEV” (@yrashev), 16,283 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yrashev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.