Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 《유안타 투자전략》 김용구/고경범/이재형/민병규/이현수/김호정/신현용/이재원

Channel

《유안타 투자전략》 김용구/고경범/이재형/민병규/이현수/김호정/신현용/이재원

@yuantais

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,755subscribers

+54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001474196305
TypeChannel
Username@yuantais
Created13 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/yuantais

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@yuantais/13870 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/190954 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuantais/13871 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/190974 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuantais/13872 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/190985 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuantais/13873 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/190995 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuantais/13874 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/191056 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC1.00under a minute
@yuantais/13875 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC@tRadarnewsdesk/191116 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@tRadarnewsdesk8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (80)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @yuantaresearch. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,7016,7646,732.57 August 2026 — 6,701 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,702 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,712 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,722 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,723 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,739 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,764 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,755 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,757 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,753 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,759 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,755 subscribers6,7557 August 202610 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 35 days, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,692–6,773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 21:586,755-4
6 Sept 2026, 02:026,759+6
2 Sept 2026, 03:556,753-4
30 Aug 2026, 07:446,757+2
27 Aug 2026, 07:336,755-9
24 Aug 2026, 15:566,764+25
20 Aug 2026, 18:526,739+16
17 Aug 2026, 17:556,723+1
14 Aug 2026, 06:556,722+10
11 Aug 2026, 00:366,712+10
7 Aug 2026, 19:456,702+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:316,701first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.5%
avg views ÷ 6,755 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,660
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
11
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held44 (29 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total18,240
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 23:40 UTC444 viewsread 20 August 2026

🧿 유안타 AI 미국 주식시장 마감시황(8/20) [퀀트 신현용 (02-3770-3634)] [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 AI 한줄평 미국 재무부의 장기국채 바이백 확대에 금리가 진정된 가운데 모더나-머크의 항암백신 임상 소식이 헬스케어를 밀어올린 하루였습니다. 금리 진정에도 반도체 장비주는 하락한 반면, 금(+4.92%)의 랠리가 지속된 하루였습니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 [1] 오늘의 핵심 이슈 5가지 1️⃣ 4대 지수 동반 강세, 헬스케어가 주도 • 다우 +0.22%, S&P 500 +0.21%, 나스닥 +0.16%, 러셀2000 +0.50% 마감. • 헬스케어(XLV) +3.51%가 섹터 최상단, 기술(XLK) -1.07%·산업재(XLI) -0.88%는 약세로

Signed 현용 신

19 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC≈3,310 viewsread 20 August 2026

[국내주식 마감시황] SK하이닉스 : “이 하락을 끝내러 왔다” (8/19) 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] KOSPI 6,471pt(-5.8%), KOSDAQ 824pt (-1.2%) ① 해외 시황 : 치솟는 장기금리에 차익실현 매물 출회 -간밤 미국 주식시장은 높은 장기금리 부담 속 최근 급등했던 스토리지, AI 전반에 차익실현 집중되며 하락. (나스닥 -1.3%, S&P500 -0.7%, 필라델피아 반도체지수 -5%). 중동 협상 진전 미미에 유가 상승, 미 국채 30년물 금리는 장중 5.3% 상회하며 2007년 이후 최고치 기록. 재정 적자와 국채 공급, AI 기업들의 대규모 자금조달 이어지며 미국-일본-유럽 금리 동반상승. 장기금리 부담 지속되는 양상에 단기 상승폭 컸던 AI 하드웨어에 차익실현 매물 출회.

Signed LJW

18 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC840 viewsread 20 August 2026

[국내주식 마감시황] 부담스런 금리, 외국인 자금 유출입에 전강후약 (8/18) 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] KOSPI 6,869pt(-1.6%), KOSDAQ 834pt (-3.5%) ① 해외 시황 : 연휴기간 약세였던 지수와 차별화된 강세 스토리지 -연휴 기간 미국 주식시장 전반적으로 약세. 금요일, 7월 소매판매 전월 대비 0.6% 감소 ? 8월 미시간대 소비자심리지수 51(예상치 하회) 등 지표 발표 이후 경기 둔화 우려 부각. 간밤도 추가 하락. 중동 불안 지속되며 국제유가 상승. 특히 30년물 국채금리 5.3% 상회하며 2007년 이후 최고치. 경제지표 둔화에도 재정 부담과 AI 투자 확대에 따른 회사채 발행 증가가 장기채 금리를 끌어올리고 있는 상황. 그럼에도! 스토리지 전반 강세. 1) 엔트로픽의

Signed LJW

17 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC550 viewsread 20 August 2026

🧿 유안타 AI 미국 주식시장 마감시황(8/18) [퀀트 신현용 (02-3770-3634)] [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 AI 한줄평 엔비디아의 1,050억 달러 오픈AI 데이터센터 베팅과 반도체 강세에도, 트럼프의 이란 휴전 종료·오만 폭격 경고에 유가가 급등하고 30년물 금리가 19년 만의 최고(5.31%)로 치솟으며 4대 지수가 일제히 밀린 하루였습니다. AI 성장 열기와 지정학·금리 부담이 정면충돌했습니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 [1] 오늘의 핵심 이슈 5가지 1️⃣ AI 열기에도 4대 지수 동반 하락 • 반도체·AI 관련주 강세에도 지정학·금리 부담이 우세하며 다우 -0.51%, S&P 500 -0.52%, 나스닥 -0.32%, 러셀2000 -0.35% 마감.

Signed LJW

17 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC≈5,880 viewsread 20 August 2026

🧿 [8/18, Conviction Calls] 연준 금리인상 우려를 덜어낼 때, Bull-Steepening Winner를 채운다 유안타 주식전략 김용구(02-3770-3521) 텔레그램: < https://t.me/ConvictionCall > Key Takeaways: - 하반기 연준 금리인상 컨센서스, 2회에서 1회 이하로 급변 - 시장금리 환경, Bear-Flattening에서 Bull-Steepening으로 전환 예상 - 동 국면 Winner는 실적 모멘텀 겸비 낙폭과대주: 기계, 바이오, 반도체, IT가전, 화학, 조선 ■ 하반기 연준 금리인상 컨센서스, 7월 말 2회에서 1회 이하로 급변 - 하반기 연준 정책금리 컨센서스가 7월 말 2회 인상('26년 12월 만기 OIS 4.2%)에서 8/17일 현재 1회 이하(OIS

Signed 유안타 투자전략팀 김세빈

17 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC908 viewsread 20 August 2026

🧿 유안타 [투자전략팀 김용구] [펀드 플로우 Weekly] - 신흥국 주식형 펀드 순유출 전환, 국채·장기채 순유입 확대 ■ 신흥국 주식형 펀드 순유출 전환, 채권은 장기채·국채 순유입 확대 • 지난주(8/6 ~ 8/12) 주식형 펀드(+$328.8억 → +$160.9억) 순유입 축소. 다만 선진국(+0.09% → +0.10%)은 미국(+$95.7억 → +$156.1억)과 유럽을 중심으로 유입이 확대됐고, 감소분은 전액 신흥국(+$86.5억 → -$118.5억)에서 발생. 이는 7주 만의 순유출 전환. 특히 Asia ex-Japan(-$136.6억)에서 순유출이 대폭 발생한 반면 GEM(+$20.8억, 5주 연속)은 순유입을 지속. 따라서 이는 사실상 중국 단일 요인으로 판단. 한편 채권형 펀드(+$230.9억 → +$237.9억)는 장

Signed 유안타 투자전략팀 김세빈

14 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 20 August 2026

[국내주식 마감시황] KOSPI·KOSDAQ 월화수목금 모두 상승 (8/14) 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] KOSPI 6,977pt(+2.4%), KOSDAQ 864pt (+0.4%) ① 해외 시황 : 소비자물가에 이어 생산자물가 마저 예상치 하회 -간밤 미국 주식시장 상승(나스닥 +0.8%, S&P500 +0.7%, 필라델피아 반도체지수 +0.5%). 7월 생산자물가가 예상치 하회하고 국제유가가 하락하며 금리인상 우려 완화. 시장금리 하락하며 기술주 중심 상승. 샌디스크, 인베스터 데이에서 잉여현금흐름의 100%를 주주환원 하겠다는 방침 제시하며 13.7% 상승 및 스토리지 동반 상승 견인 ② 수급 : KOSPI 외국인 자금 대량 유입, KOSDAQ도 개인 자금 연속 유입 = 양대 지수 상승 -KRX KOS

Signed LJW

13 Aug 2026, 23:21 UTC857 viewsread 20 August 2026

🧿유안타 [Economist 김호정(02-3770-3630)] [8/14 일본 금융시장 15문15답: 국채금리·엔화약세·미일공조, 핵심 쟁점에 답하다] 최근 일본 금융시장에서 장기 JGB 금리 상승과 엔화 약세가 동시에 나타나는 이례적 조합이 이어지고 있습니다. 이번 보고서에서는 이를 둘러싼 핵심 쟁점 15가지를 15문 15답 형식으로 추려, BOJ 정상화·JGB 수급·엔화 약세·미일 공조 개입의 의미를 점검했습니다. ■ 핵심 요약 1. 최근 JGB 금리 상승은 단순한 재정위기성 국채 매도가 아니라, BOJ 정상화와 가격정상화 기능 회복, 기간 프리미엄 상승이 동시에 반영된 결과로 판단. 2. JGB 투자 매력이 높아지고 경상흑자가 확대됐음에도 엔화가 강세로 전환되지 않는 이유는 금리 수준보다 실제 환전·환헤지 구조에 있음. 3. 미·일

Signed Ji Yoon Lim

13 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC≈2,880 viewsread 20 August 2026

[주간:知] 코스닥에 잠깐 돌렸던 시선, 코스피로 복귀할 때 (8월 3주) 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ■[Summary] -주간(8/7~8/13) KOSPI, KOSDAQ은 각각 8.2%, 7.5% 상승했습니다. 비농가고용 부진에 이어 소비자물가는 예상치에 부합하고 생산자물가는 예상을 하회하면서 금리 불확실성이 완화됐습니다. 여기에 AI 인프라 기업들의 호실적까지 더해지며 외국인은 KOSPI에서 주간 5.1조원을 순매수했고, KOSPI는 120일 이동평균선을 재차 회복했습니다. -8월 초 KOSDAQ 비중 확대 전략은 개인 수급 복귀와 대형주 쏠림 완화에 힘입어 유효했습니다. 다만 2024년 이후 국내 모멘텀 스타일은 KOSDAQ보다 KOSPI와 높은 동조화를 보이고 있습니다. 최근에도 KOSPI 이익추정치는

Signed LJW

13 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC407 viewsread 20 August 2026

🧿 유안타 AI 미국 주식시장 마감시황(8/14) [퀀트 신현용 (02-3770-3634)] [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 AI 한줄평 도매물가 둔화가 금리 동결·인하 기대에 불을 지피며 S&P 500이 사상 최고가를 새로 썼고, 실적을 웃돌고도 마진 우려로 급락한 시스코와 장기 실적 목표에 폭등한 메모리주가 극명하게 갈린 하루였습니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 [1] 오늘의 핵심 이슈 5가지 1️⃣ S&P 500 사상 최고가 마감 • 도매물가 둔화로 금리 인하 기대가 살아나며 S&P 500 +0.65%로 종가 기준 사상 최고치 경신. • 나스닥 +0.81%, 다우존스 +0.13%, 러셀2000 +0.24% 동반 상승 마감. 2️⃣ 도매물가 둔화에 연준 정책 기대 이동

Signed LJW

13 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC654 viewsread 20 August 2026

[국내주식 마감시황] 물가 확인 후 강력한 외국인 순매수 = KOSPI 상승 동력 (8/13) 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] KOSPI 6,813pt(+3.6%), KOSDAQ 861pt (+0.3%) ① 해외 시황 : 소비자물가 예상치 부합과 AI주 호실적 발표 -간밤 미국 주식시장 혼조(나스닥 +0.5%, S&P500 +0.3%, 다우 -0.04%, 필라델피아 반도체지수 +2.5%). 소비자물가 예상치 부합에 금리 인상 우려 완화. AI 인프라 및 반도체주 상승. 코어위브, 슈퍼마이크로컴퓨터 실적 발표 이후 19% 급등. AI 데이터센터 투자가 실제 주문과 매출로 연결되고 있음을 재확인 ② 수급 : KOSPI 외국인 자금 대량 유입, KOSDAQ도 개인 자금 연속 유입 = 양대 지수 상승 -KRX KOSPI

Signed LJW

12 Aug 2026, 23:22 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 20 August 2026

🧿 유안타 [Passive/ETF 고경범] 『8월 MSCI 정기변경 발표 Comment』 • 리밸런싱은 8/31(월) 진행. LG이노텍 1종목 편입. 삼성에피스홀딩스, 포스코인터내셔널, LG디스플레이, HLB 4종목 편출. • LG이노텍의 편입 수요는 +2,337억원(거래대금 대비 1.6배). 동사의 편입 모멘텀은 3개월 전 PCB/MLCC 모멘텀 부여와 실적 턴어라운드와 MSCI 편입 이슈가 부각되며 선반영 수준이 높은 것으로 판단. 레오폴드의 Situational Awareness의 일본 다이요 유덴 지분매입 등의 이슈가 국내 PCB/MLCC 종목군에 1거래일 정도 반영될 수는 있지만, 현 시점에서는 기존 선반영 자금의 비중 축소가 진행될 유인이 높아 보임. • 유동시가총액 하회로 편출된 삼성에피스홀딩스(-798억원, 거래대금 대비

Signed 경범 고

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @yuantais. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“《유안타 투자전략》 김용구/고경범/이재형/민병규/이현수/김호정/신현용/이재원” (@yuantais), 6,755 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuantais.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.