사진
Signed 주식전략 김용구

Channel
@yuantais
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,787subscribers
+86 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001474196305 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yuantais |
| Description | 유안타증권 투자전략 텔레그램 |
| Created | 13 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yuantais |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @yuantais/13870 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC | @tRadarnewsdesk/190954 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuantais/13871 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC | @tRadarnewsdesk/190974 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuantais/13872 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC | @tRadarnewsdesk/190985 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuantais/13873 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC | @tRadarnewsdesk/190995 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuantais/13874 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC | @tRadarnewsdesk/191056 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @yuantais/13875 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC | @tRadarnewsdesk/191116 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @tRadarnewsdesk | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (8–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @yuantaresearch. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:18 | 6,787 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 6,786 | +1 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 6,785 | +5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:25 | 6,780 | +1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:39 | 6,779 | +13 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:27 | 6,766 | +2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 02:28 | 6,764 | +7 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 00:44 | 6,757 | +2 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 6,755 | -12 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 6,767 | +12 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 6,755 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:36 | 6,753 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:58 | 6,755 | -4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:02 | 6,759 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 6,753 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 6,757 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 6,755 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 6,764 | +25 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 6,739 | +16 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 6,723 | first reading |
74 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 74 (29 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 34,597 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 00:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (10.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
사진
Signed 주식전략 김용구
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 유안타증권 시황 이재원
🧿텍사스 주지사 당선인, 주민 보호 법률 마련 전까지 데이터센터 개발 관련 현행 추진 중단 필요. 머스크와 조건부 협력 가능 • 11월 5일 CNN 인터뷰에서 Gina Hinojosa 텍사스 주지사 당선인은 주민 보호 법률이 마련될 때까지 데이터센터와 관련해 현재 추진 중인 방식을 멈춰야 한다고 발언 • 선거 기간부터 데이터센터 자체보다 전력·용수 부담과 기업에 대한 과도한 세제 혜택을 문제 삼아 온 입장. 데이터센터 산업 자체를 반대하는 것은 아니라는 점도 강조 • 일론 머스크 및 그의 기업들과 강력한 협력 관계를 구축할 수 있지만, 협력은 텍사스 주정부가 정하는 조건에 따라 이뤄져야 한다고 언급 • 기존 공약은 주민 보호 법률 제정 전까지 신규 데이터센터 승인 중단. 앞선 현지 인터뷰에서도 신규 시설에 적용된다고 설명. 이번 발언을…
Signed LJW
[시황저격] 중간선거 이후 AI 사이클에 던지는 네 가지 질문 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ■ 목차 -예상된 Blue Wave보다 강했던 주정부의 판도 변화 -Blue Wave 이후: 금리, 유가 하락에도 불구 AI 인프라 전반 투매 -Q1. 민주당, 무엇을 실제로 바꿀 수 있는가? (재정확대 저지와 정책 입법은 다르다) -Q2. 데이터센터 규제 강화는 실제 투자 중단을 뜻하는가? -Q3. 빅테크는 이런 상황(데이터센터 지연)을 예상하지 못했는가? -Q4. 반도체 급락은 메모리 다운사이클의 시작인가? -그 외 AI 인프라에 대한 고민 (전력, 신재생) -결론: 아직 현실화되지 않은 최악의 투자 축소 시나리오를 반영 중 ■[Summary] Q1. 민주당, 무엇을 실제로 바꿀 수 있는가? :추가 감세와 재정확대는…
Signed LJW
🧿 유안타 AI 미국 주식시장 마감시황(11/6) [퀀트 신현용 (02-3770-3634)] [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 AI 한줄평 중간선거 다음 날의 반등이 하루 만에 뒤집혔습니다. 데이터센터 투자 둔화 우려와 반도체 실적 실망이 겹치며 AI 성장주가 2020년 이후 최악의 하루를 맞았고, 투자자들은 국채와 방어주로 피신했습니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 [1] 오늘의 핵심 이슈 5가지 1️⃣ AI 성장주 붕괴, 나스닥 2025년 4월 이후 최악 • 반도체·AI 관련주 전방위 매도로 나스닥 -5.52%, S&P 500 -4.36%, 다우 -3.44% 마감 • S&P 500 시가총액 약 2.9조 달러 증발, 기술주 기준 2020년 팬데믹 이후 하루 최대 낙폭 기록 …
Signed 현용 신
[국내주식 마감시황] 시즌 종료일까 (11/5) 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] KOSPI 5,383pt(-5.3%), KOSDAQ 678pt(-5.1%) 시황 : 데이터센터 투자 사이클이 시즌 종료됐다는 것을 가정하는 시장 -금일 KOSPI, KOSDAQ 각각 5.3%, 5.1% 하락하며 양지수 매도 사이드카 발동됐습니다. 텍사스 등 주요 지역의 데이터센터 규제 강화로 신규 설비투자 지연 우려가 부각되며 삼성전자(-6.9%), SK하이닉스(-8.7%) 등 반도체 대형주와 반도체 기판, 반도체 소부장, 광통신, 전력기기, 전선 등 AI 인프라 전반이 큰 폭 하락했습니다. 안타까운 점은 2차전지, ESS, 태양광과 같이 Blue Wave의 수혜주로 판단되는 테마들 조차 전일 급등 이후 차익실현 매물 출회됐다는 점입니…
Signed LJW
🧿 유안타 AI 미국 주식시장 마감시황(11/5) [퀀트 신현용 (02-3770-3634)] [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 AI 한줄평 민주당의 중간선거 압승이 분열 정부에 따른 정책 교착 기대를 자극하며 다우가 18개월래 최고의 하루를 연출했고, 이란 전쟁 조기 종식 기대에 유가는 8% 급락했습니다. 다만 AI 데이터센터·전력주는 역풍을 맞으며 안도 랠리 속 테마 차별화가 뚜렷했습니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 [1] 오늘의 핵심 이슈 5가지 1️⃣ 다우 18개월래 최고의 날, 광범위한 안도 랠리 • 중간선거 결과 확인 후 다우 +3.03%로 18개월 만에 최대 상승, S&P500 +1.58%, 나스닥 +1.44% 마감 • 애플(AAPL) +5.31%, 마이크로소프트(MS…
Signed 현용 신
[국내주식 마감시황] 우려는 앞섰고, 불확실성은 완화될 것! (11/4) 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] KOSPI 5,684pt(+0.6%), KOSDAQ 715pt(+1.5%) ① 해외 시황 : 기술주 반등에 AMD 호실적 발표 -간밤 미국 증시는 다우 -0.4%, S&P500 +0.4%, 나스닥 +0.8%, 필라델피아 반도체지수 +2.6%로 기술주 반등. 엔비디아 +2.3%, 마이크론 +2.6% 등 반도체주 중심 반발 매수 유입. 장 마감 이후 AMD는 3분기 매출액 133.8억달러(+44.7% YoY), 데이터센터 매출 85.5억달러(+96.9%)로 시장 예상 상회. 가이던스 및 컨콜 내용 역시 인텔과 정반대의 긍정적 톤으로 시간외 주가 상승 ② 수급 : 외국인 2.7조원 매도에도 국내 매수 기반 확인 -…
Signed LJW
[시황저격] 예상된 Blue Wave, 앞서가는 AI 규제 우려 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ■ 목차 -예상된 민주당 우세, 실적 호재도 반납한 한국 주식시장 -데이터센터 규제, 투자 중단보다 집행 시점의 문제 -불확실성 해소 이후, 다시 금리와 이익의 문제 ■[Summary] -예상된 민주당 우세, 실적 호재도 반납한 한국 주식시장 :미국 중간선거 개표가 본격화되면서 국내 주식시장 변동성 확대. KOSPI는 AMD 호실적과 미국 반도체주 반등에 힘입어 +2.4% 상승 출발했으나, 개표 결과 확인하며 하락 전환. 나스닥100 선물과 달러 인덱스, 미국 장기금리도 동반 약세. 다만 민주당의 양원 탈환은 선거 이전부터 60% 이상 확률로 반영됐던 시나리오. Blue Wave 자체를 새로운 악재로 평가하기 어려운 …
Signed LJW
🧿 유안타 AI 미국 주식시장 마감시황(11/4) [퀀트 신현용 (02-3770-3634)] [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 AI 한줄평 AMD의 데이터센터 매출 급증 실적에 AI 성장주가 반등하며 나스닥을 끌어올렸지만, 10년물 금리가 4.95%까지 치솟고 블루칩(다우)은 약세로 돌아선 엇갈린 하루였습니다. 중간선거 결과를 앞둔 관망 속에 안전자산인 금마저 밀렸습니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 [1] 오늘의 핵심 이슈 5가지 1️⃣ AI 성장주 반등에 나스닥 상승, 다우는 약세 • 기술주 강세가 지수를 견인하며 나스닥 +0.83%, S&P 500 +0.36% 마감, 다우는 -0.38%로 엇갈림 • 기술(XLK) +1.31%, 커뮤니케이션(XLC) +1.18% 섹터가 상승 주…
Signed 현용 신
[국내주식 마감시황] 전일 선방한 시장의 시간차 공격 (11/3) 🧿유안타 [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] KOSPI 5,649pt(-3.6%), KOSDAQ 704pt(-4.1%) ① 해외 시황 : AI 투자 확대, 높아지는 자금조달 부담 -간밤 미국 주식시장은 다우 +0.4%, S&P500 -0.5%, 나스닥 -1.1%, 필라델피아 반도체지수 -3.4%로 기술주 약세 지속. 미-이란 협상 기대에 국제유가 급락하고 미국 10년물 국채금리도 4.9% 수준으로 하락했지만 AI 기업들의 자금조달 부담이 여전히 투자심리 압박. 오라클은 주식과 회사채 각각 100억달러, 총 200억달러의 자금조달을 발표했으며 회사채 표면금리는 연 7.0~8.65%로 책정. 알파벳 60억유로의 회사채를 발행, 메타도 최소 200억달러 규모의 추가 채…
Signed LJW
🧿 유안타 AI 미국 주식시장 마감시황(11/3) [퀀트 신현용 (02-3770-3634)] [시황 이재원 (02-3770-5719)] ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🤖 AI 한줄평 이란 외교 기대에 유가가 7% 넘게 폭락하며 대형 블루칩(다우 +0.41%)은 반등했지만, 오라클의 200억 달러 AI 자금조달이 버블 우려를 자극하며 성장주·반도체는 매물에 시달린 하루였습니다. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔥 [1] 오늘의 핵심 이슈 5가지 1️⃣ 유가 급락에 다우 반등, 기술주는 약세 • 유가 폭락과 섹터 순환매로 다우 +0.41% 반등, 반면 기술주 중심 나스닥 -1.07%, S&P 500 -0.51% 마감 • 임의소비재·금융·소재 등 비기술 경기민감주 강세, 기술(XLK) -2.95%·에너지(XLE) -3.96%로 양극화 …
Signed LJW
Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @yuantais. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“《유안타 투자전략》 김용구/고경범/이재형/민병규/이현수/김호정/신현용/이재원” (@yuantais), 6,787 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yuantais.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.