Channel
@zangerprogpt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
289subscribers
+29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003861529531 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zangerprogpt |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 12 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zangerprogpt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 289 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:39 | 288 | +10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 278 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 276 | +8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 268 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 260 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 260 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 12 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
152 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 68 | 44.7% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 29.6% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 11.8% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 3.95% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 3.29% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 2.63% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 2.63% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.658% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.658% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Часть 3. Это фиаско, Kimi Это будет последний пост про агента Kimi и эмоций здесь будет не меньше, чем в первых двух частях (часть 1, часть 2). Итак, после долгих мучений я всё-таки подключилась к браузеру. Но как мы привыкли работать с агентами в Claude Code или Codex? Дали задание, дали разрешение на все действия и пошли пить кофе. С Kimi это так не заработало) Я сидела и нажимала каждые 10 сек на разрешение. В …
👍9❤3🔥3🤝1
Продолжение. 3,5 часа до первого клика (часть 1) Слушайте, ну Claude и Kimi в плане юзерфрендли вообще небо и земля..🙈 У Kimi есть два способа отправить агента в браузер: из приложения на ПК и через Kimi Code. Я попробовала оба. Способ 1. Приложение на ПК Ставите Kimi Desktop App, расширение для браузера Kimi WebBridge и отправляете агента походить по сайту. Звучит просто. Но если вы вдруг захотите отправить его …
👍6🤔1🤝1
Есть ли замена Claude? Часть 1. Неужели Кимико Вчера был анонсирован выход новой китайской ИИ-модели Kimi K3 / K3 Swam от компании Moonshot AI. Для поиска судебной практики на сайтах справочно-правовых систем я рекомендую использовать Claude for Chrome, но этот инструмент труднодоступен российским юристам: - сложно оплатить, потому что принимаются только зарубежные карты; - всегда нужно подключение к VPN; - компан…
👍5🔥3🤔1🤣1
А вы знали, что картинку или слайд, сделанные в ИИ, теперь можно редактировать? Я много выступаю с лекциями, провожу вебинары и публикую результаты своих исследований в социальных сетях. Для этого некоторые слайды или карточки в Инстаграм создаю с помощью ИИ (NotebookLM или Claude). Но обычно нельзя редактировать или переписывать такую картинку, неважно, в каком она формате (PNG, PPTX и т.д.). На скрине 1 вы видит…
👍11🔥5❤2🤝2
Claude удвоил 5-часовые лимиты на тарифах Pro/Max Друзья, если вы еще раздумываете, попробовать Claude Cowork в своей работе или нет, то сейчас самое время это сделать. Компания Anthropic анонсировала удвоенные 5-часовые лимиты при работе в Claude Cowork. Что это значит? Теперь за одну сессию Cowork можно сделать вдвое больше, не упираясь в лимит на середине задачи. НО! Недельный лимит прежний. Акция действует до 5…
🔥12
Как установить Claude для Google Chrome Лучше 1 раз увидеть, чем 100 раз прочитать, поэтому записала для вас небольшое видео, где показываю: - как установить расширение Claude в браузере Google Chrome; - как устроено меню чата; - какие есть настройки. Приятного просмотра и не переключайтесь! Что показать дальше? 👍 - надстройка Claude для Word ❤️ - надстройка Claude для Excel Юрист про ИИ | Заңгер ЖИ туралы | Yout…
👍10❤1👏1
Пользуетесь ли вы функцией "Глубокое исследование" (Deep Research), если да, то на какой модели? (Можно выбрать несколько вариантов)
The shares total 168%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Posted without readable text
Как часто в своей работе вы используете нейросети?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Коллеги, а давайте проведем опрос, как часто вы используете нейросети в своей работе, а потом узнаем, какими ИИ вы чаще всего пользуетесь?
Можно ли поручить нейросети поиск судебной практики? Ситуация на злобу дня. Допустим, вы запросили в Акимате информацию или обратились с просьбой в госорган (учреждение) выдать вам что-то, а вам отказывают. И отказ этот оформляется не в виде решения/постановления, а просто письмом на Egov. Вы идете обжаловать этот отказ как неазконный в суд, а суд возвращает исковое заявление с формулировкой, что это «не является а…
👍11❤9🔥6
Сколько времени у вас уходит, чтобы собрать судебную практику по ОДНОМУ вопросу?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @zangerprogpt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Пользуетесь ли вы функцией "Глубокое исследование" (Deep Research), если да, то на какой модели? (Можно выбрать несколько вариантов)
The shares total 168%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как часто в своей работе вы используете нейросети?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сколько времени у вас уходит, чтобы собрать судебную практику по ОДНОМУ вопросу?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 19 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юрист про ИИ | Заңгер ЖИ туралы” (@zangerprogpt), 289 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zangerprogpt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.