Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کاربردهای هوش مصنوعی دکتر پیرملکی

Channel

کاربردهای هوش مصنوعی دکتر پیرملکی

@AI_in_Practice

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,332subscribers

+1,229 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001532914106
TypeChannel
Username@AI_in_Practice
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AI_in_Practice

Growth

14,10315,33214,717.56 August 2026 — 14,103 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,120 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,187 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,251 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,303 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,353 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,379 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,386 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,433 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,496 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,595 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,648 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,706 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,743 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,768 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,810 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,876 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,928 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,940 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,969 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,021 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,070 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,108 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,114 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,145 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,157 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,198 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,274 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,332 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 33 days, net +1,229. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,919–15,516 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 17:3815,332+58
5 Sept 2026, 09:1915,274+76
3 Sept 2026, 10:2915,198+41
2 Sept 2026, 02:1315,157+12
31 Aug 2026, 23:5915,145+31
31 Aug 2026, 00:5815,114+6
30 Aug 2026, 02:1615,108+38
28 Aug 2026, 23:5615,070+49
27 Aug 2026, 22:0315,021+52
27 Aug 2026, 00:4614,969+29
25 Aug 2026, 21:4414,940+12
25 Aug 2026, 00:4314,928+52
23 Aug 2026, 09:0414,876+66
21 Aug 2026, 19:5414,810+42
20 Aug 2026, 17:5214,768+25
19 Aug 2026, 16:2614,743+37
18 Aug 2026, 18:2214,706+58
17 Aug 2026, 19:3314,648+53
16 Aug 2026, 15:1814,595+99
15 Aug 2026, 01:5314,496first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.6%
avg views ÷ 15,332 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,770
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.548%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 68 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held68 (30 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total139,500
Reactions total764
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 20s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,423 reactions across 62 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
73751.8%
👍1299.07%
😡946.61%
🤔835.83%
🤬674.71%
💔644.50%
🙏563.94%
👌503.51%
👏302.11%
👎261.83%
🤨161.12%
👀80.562%
🔥80.562%
🤯70.492%
🍌50.351%
😍50.351%
💯40.281%
🤣40.281%
🥴40.281%
🎄30.211%
14 further kinds231.62%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,423 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,350 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026

فیلترشکن VPN مناسب برای جمنای. دوستان زیادی این روزها به ادمین‌های ما پیام دادند و اعلام کردند که نمی‌تونن جمنای رو باز کنند. از آیدی زیر می‌تونید فیلترشکن VPN مناسب تهیه کنید👇 @BestVPNforIran 🌺🌺🌺

4👀1

Signed پویا پیرملکی

2 Sept 2026, 07:16 UTC≈1,830 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

@AI_in_Practice ⚖️ تفاوت جمنای رایگان و پرو؛ چرا پژوهشگران حرفه‌ای به نسخه Pro نیاز دارند؟ 📊 تفاوت‌های کلیدی در یک نگاه: نسخه رایگان صرفاً برای کارهای روزمره است، در حالی که جمنای پرو با قدرت استدلال عمیق، حافظه فوق‌العاده حجیم برای پردازش هم‌زمان ده‌ها مقاله و دقت بالا در تحلیل فایل‌های پیچیده، ابزاری بی‌نظیر برای پژوهشگران به شمار می‌رود. 🎯 چرا «جمنای پرو» در پژوهش یک ضرورت است؟ وقتی صحبت از نگارش پایان‌نامه، ت

9👀1

Signed F.khademi

1 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC≈2,190 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

@AI_in_Practice ​🔥 ۹۰ درصد قدرت جمنای پنهان است! 🔥 ​جمنای دیگر یک ربات پاسخ‌گو نیست؛ بلکه به یک «معمار تحلیل داده و استراتژی» تبدیل شده است. ما در «دوره استادی جمنای (Gemini Mastery)» طی ۳۵ جلسه ویدیویی، شما را از یک کاربر ساده به یک سیستم‌ساز حرفه‌ای در محیط آکادمیک و سازمانی تبدیل می‌کنیم. ​🚀 ۴ بازوی قدرتمندی که در این دوره به آن‌ها مسلط می‌شوید: 1️⃣تسلط بر محیط Canvas 2️⃣ موتور Deep Research 3️⃣ ترکیب طلایی

4🤔2

Signed F.khademi

31 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC≈2,350 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

@AI_in_Practice 👩‍🔬 بازار کار پژوهشگران در عصر AI در حال تغییر است! 🔬 یک گزارش جدید از Nature به موضوع مهمی پرداخته(متن کامل خبر) در آینده، صرفاً داشتن مدرک، مقاله یا حتی آشنایی با ابزارهایی مثل ChatGPT برای یک پژوهشگر کافی نخواهد بود. کارفرمایان علمی بیش از گذشته به پژوهشگرانی نیاز دارند که بتوانند هوش مصنوعی را در فرایند واقعی پژوهش به کار بگیرند؛ نه اینکه فقط اسم چند ابزار AI را بدانند. به زبان ساده: AI Literac

2🤔2🙏2

Signed F.khademi

30 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC≈2,440 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

@AI_in_Practice ⏳ نوشتن پیشینه پژوهش ۵۰ مقاله در کوتاهترین زمان! هفته‌ها زمان برای مرور مقالات و استخراج جدول پیشینه پژوهش؟ این روش دیگر منسوخ شده است! با ابزار قدرتمند نوت بوک ال ام گوگل، می‌توانید کل کتابخانه مقالات خود را در کوتاهترین زمان به یک دستیار پژوهشی تبدیل کنید. مسیر میانبر پژوهش: ۱. وارد سایت نوت بوک ال ام (جمنای نوت بوک) شوید. ۲. یک کتابخانه جدید بسازید و فایل مقالات را بارگزاری کنید. ۳. پس از آم

👍9🙏3🤔2

Signed F.khademi

30 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈2,320 views50 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @maktabevahyorg

🔻 مادرِ بت‌ها بتِ نفْسِ شماست ز‌آنکه آن بتْ مار و این بُتْ اژدهاست 🔺 🔸 پیغمبر اکرم صلّی‌الله‌علیه‌وآله با آن بت‌هایی که در نفس انسان است طرف است؛ یعنی همان کبریائیت‌ها، انانیت‌ها، ریاست‌ها، «تو و منی»ها و بزرگی‌طلبی‌ها. وگرنه بتی را که در بیرون است، همچون حضرت ابراهیم علیه‌السلام می‌شکنند و می‌اندازند و وقتی آن را زدند و انداختند، دیگر تمام می‌شود! 🔸 اما این بت‌هایی که در نفس انسان است، تمامی ندارد و جنگ به راه می

38🤔3❤‍🔥2👀2👌2👍2🐳1

Signed پویا پیرملکی

29 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC≈2,610 views84 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @maktabevahyorgPhoto

🔸 ز احمد تا احَد یک میم فرق است جهانی اندر آن یک میم غرق است 🔸 مقام دل‌گشایش جمعِ جمع است جمال جان‌فزایش شمعِ جمع است 🔆 درخششِ بی‌منتهای اوّل تجلّیِ خداوندگار، رحمت جاری پروردگار، یگانه حاکمِ ارض و سَما، حضرت محمد مصطفی صلّی‌الله‌علیه‌و‌آله و خجسته میلاد هشتمین قرآنِ ناطق، حضرت امام جعفر صادق علیه‌السلام بر جمیع آزادمردان عرصۀ گیتی و پاکبازان پهنۀ هستی میمون و مبارک باد. 🖇 #رسول_خدا #امام_صادق علیهماالسلام 📲 تلگر

73🤔9🥰2

Signed پویا پیرملکی

29 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC≈2,830 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

@AI_in_Practice 🧩 تکنیک ساختارشکنی معکوس(Reverse Outlining) همه ما این تجربه تلخ را داشته‌ایم: هفته‌ها برای نوشتن بخش‌های مختلف یک مقاله یا گزارش سازمانی وقت می‌گذاریم اما پس از بارها خواندن متنِ خود، دچار«کوریِ ویرایشی»می‌شویم و نمی‌توانیم پرش‌های منطقی بین پاراگراف‌ها را تشخیص دهیم. ⚙️ این تکنیک در کتاب مرجعِ The Craft of Research معرفی شده است؛ یعنی استخراج ایده اصلیِ هر پاراگراف برای بررسی زنجیره منطقی کل متن.

👏74🤔2🙏2

Signed F.khademi

28 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC≈3,180 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

@AI_in_Practice 🕸 عصر «Graph RAG»؛ استخراج شبکه مفهومی مقالات به‌جای خلاصه‌سازی خطی! مهم‌ترین تحول اخیر در مدل‌های زبانی، گذار از جستجوی ساده متنی به «گراف دانش»(Graph RAG) است؛ یعنی تحلیل اسناد بر پایه شبکه ارتباطی متغیرها و تئوری‌ها، نه صرفاً کلمات کلیدی. با اجرای این پرامپت مهندسی‌شده در Gemini یا ChatGPT، ساختار مقالات را به یک شبکه مفهومی تبدیل کنید: 📋 پرامپت استخراج گراف دانش(Knowledge Graph): Act as a Know

🙏98🤔2

Signed F.khademi

27 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC≈3,480 views5 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔬 هوش مصنوعی به سمت راستی‌آزمایی پژوهش‌ها می‌رود ایجنت‌های هوش مصنوعی می‌توانند فرایند ارزیابی پژوهش ها را خودکار کنند؛ از بررسی کدها و داده‌ها گرفته تا اجرای دوباره آن‌ها برای راستی‌آزمایی صحت نتایج پژوهش. این اتفاق می‌تواند نقش هوش مصنوعی را از یک «دستیار نگارش مقاله» به یک «دستیار اعتبارسنجی پژوهش» ارتقا دهد. ⚖️ گوگل، Gemini را وارد صنعت حقوقی کرد گوگل از Gemini Enterprise for Legal رونمایی کرده؛ راهکاری تخصصی برا

🤔2🙏21

Signed F.khademi

26 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈3,560 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

@AI_in_Practice ​🚨 پایان عصر «خرید ابزار»؛ آغاز عصر «سازمان‌دهی با AI» ​گزارش تازه McKinsey (State of AI 2026) یک پارادوکس عجیب را فاش کرد: نزدیک به ۹۰٪ سازمان‌ها اکنون از هوش مصنوعی استفاده می‌کنند، اما تنها ۶٪ از آن‌ها توانسته‌اند به سودآوری و ارزش‌آفرینی واقعی برسند! ​🎯 چرا بقیه شکست می‌خورند؟ دلیل ساده است؛ اکثر سازمان‌ها و تیم‌های پژوهشی صرفاً در حال «خرید اکانت و اضافه کردن ابزار» هستند. پیام صریح مکینزی این

8🤔3

Signed F.khademi

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @AI_in_Practice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@AI_in_Practice edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

هوش مصنوعی در پژوهش
@AI_in_Research · 257,584
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
آموزش پایان نامه و مقاله نویسی پژوهه
@pajoohehgroup · 60,738
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
آموزش نوین مقاله نویسی با هوش مصنوعی
@tephd · 77,491
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
اخبار جذب هیات علمی و اساتید دانشگاه
@heiatelmi · 44,988
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کاربردهای هوش مصنوعی دکتر پیرملکی” (@AI_in_Practice), 15,332 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AI_in_Practice.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.