π Look whoβs at the top. APEPE takes the #1 spot on CoinMarketCapβs list. π
π₯40β€32π30π26π€©25π₯°25π16π2

Channel
@APEPE_Official
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Domains linked from posts Β· Cite this entry
904,557subscribers
-94,909 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 316,228β1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001946061129 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @APEPE_Official |
| Description | βΆοΈ APEPE Official Chat1 : https://t.me/apeandpepe βΆοΈ APEPE Official Chat2 : https://t.me/apeandpepe2 βΆοΈ APEPE Official Chat3 : https://t.me/apeandpepe03 APEPE memes are driven only by the power of the community. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/APEPE_Official |
Memes & entertainment β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 904,557 | +9,644 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 894,913 | -43,610 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 938,523 | -10,950 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:50 | 949,473 | -4,434 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:57 | 953,907 | -2,331 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 956,238 | -100 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:17 | 956,338 | -2,169 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:20 | 958,507 | +3,175 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 955,332 | -2,171 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 03:10 | 957,503 | -5,591 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 02:48 | 963,094 | -2,752 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 965,846 | +5,501 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 960,345 | +1,890 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 958,455 | -6,661 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:55 | 965,116 | -10,417 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 975,533 | -5,754 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 981,287 | -1,484 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 982,771 | -674 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 983,445 | +20,942 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 962,503 | first reading |
54 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 20 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 54 (8 July 2026 β 20 October 2026) |
| Views total | 184,150 |
| Reactions total | 1,938 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Oct 2026, 12:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 24 October 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
6,273 reactions across 54 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 1,440 | 23.0% | |
| π₯ | 795 | 12.7% | |
| π | 786 | 12.5% | |
| π | 784 | 12.5% | |
| π€© | 782 | 12.5% | |
| π | 772 | 12.3% | |
| π₯° | 766 | 12.2% | |
| π― | 21 | 0.335% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 16 | 0.255% | |
| π | 15 | 0.239% | |
| π€‘ | 13 | 0.207% | |
| πΎ | 11 | 0.175% | |
| π | 10 | 0.159% | |
| π | 9 | 0.143% | |
| π | 8 | 0.128% | |
| π | 8 | 0.128% | |
| β‘ | 6 | 0.096% | |
| π | 6 | 0.096% | |
| π | 6 | 0.096% | |
| π | 5 | 0.08% | |
| 7 further kinds | 14 | 0.223% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 6,273 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 20 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
π Look whoβs at the top. APEPE takes the #1 spot on CoinMarketCapβs list. π
π₯40β€32π30π26π€©25π₯°25π16π2
π¨ APEPE Γ BingX MEME CONTEST! π° $6,500 worth of APEPE in rewards! MEME WITH APEPE. TRADE WITH BingX. π How to Join: βΈ Create a meme image or video featuring APEPE and BingX. βΈ Quote this post with your creation. βΈ Tag @BingXOfficial @apepeofficial and include βMEME WITH APEPE. TRADE WITH BingX.β π 1st: 1,700,000,000 APEPE π₯ 2nd: 900,000,000 APEPE π₯ 3rd: 450,000,000 APEPE π 10 additional winners: 85,000,000 APEPE eβ¦
β€27π€©26π₯19π18π18π₯°17π16
πMEMONS MILESTONE π₯ 100,000 USERS π 600,000 CAPSULES OPENED Thank you for being part of the MEMONS journey.
β€28π€©28π₯25π24π₯°22π19π15
π¨ MEMONS CREATIVE CONTEST β WINNERS π The MEMONS Creative Contest has officially come to an end! π A huge thank you to everyone who participated and brought their creativity to life on Base! π΅β¨ After reviewing the amazing submissions, we're excited to announce our winners here! π Link :https://docs.google.com/document/d/15id3IoYjnNdi6bICPl6Mzbu6AZtFfKZGby00-QpXwF8 π© Prize Distribution Prizes are scheduled to be β¦
π22π22π€©20π16π₯16π₯°16β€9
From media coverage to ecosystem collaborations, APEPE continues to expand its presence across Web3. Our journey has brought us together with a wide range of projects, platforms, and communities. Discover the connections and milestones featured on our newly launched Media page! π Link: https://apepe.lol/
π15π13β€12π₯°10π9π₯9π€©8
Bro said he was going for a walk.
π30π₯27π₯°26π23β€22π€©21π15
πAPEPE Γ Coinone continues this October. A total of 20,000,000,000 APEPE in rewards! π₯ β Trade APEPE on Coinone to receive guaranteed rewards β Earn additional rewards by placing in the trading rankings Join the APEPE Festa on Coinone, one of Koreaβs leading exchanges! πΈπ π Learn more: https://coinone.co.kr/info/notice/5832
π36π35β€32π€©27π24π₯°21π₯20
Dodging the red. Chasing the green π
π€©29β€23π₯22π₯°22π20π19π17
π¨ MEMONS CREATIVE CONTEST π¬ MEMONS has officially surpassed 100K User Operations on Base! Letβs celebrate together! π΅β¨ Create an image or video featuring the MEMONS logo, card characters, and Base, and show us your creativity! π MEMONS Reference Images: https://www.apepe.io/collection?char=apepe π How to Participate β Like this post β‘ Create an image or video and Quote this announcement with your work attached β’ β¦
π₯24π18π18π€©18π17π₯°16β€11π₯±2
MEMONS is live on Base π Since our open beta: - 109,261 onchain actions - 69,289 unique wallets Just meme cards, verified onchain. Built on @base π΅ @buildonbase
β€24π€©24π₯22π₯°21π17π16π14
Uptober is here
β€16π€©14π₯13π₯°13π11π10π7π1
The APEPE universe is expanding π
π₯°20π19π₯18π16π€©16π11β€8
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @APEPE_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@APEPE_Official named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
Telegramβs own answer, not this registerβs. When this register asks Telegramβs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it β never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramβs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramβs recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register β how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
3 domains this channelβs own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves β not the channelβs description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπΈ APEPE πΈβ (@APEPE_Official), 904,557 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/APEPE_Official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.