Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
106 measurements spanning 86 days, net -14,344. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,101–127,608 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 106
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Nov 2026, 15:16
66,059
-1,007
31 Oct 2026, 22:46
67,066
-89
31 Oct 2026, 15:06
67,155
-1,094
30 Oct 2026, 20:07
68,249
-90
30 Oct 2026, 18:28
68,339
-1,766
29 Oct 2026, 20:56
70,105
no change
29 Oct 2026, 19:40
70,105
-1,140
28 Oct 2026, 18:08
71,245
-77
28 Oct 2026, 17:40
71,322
-1,552
27 Oct 2026, 17:06
72,874
no change
27 Oct 2026, 16:06
72,874
-809
26 Oct 2026, 20:15
73,683
-197
26 Oct 2026, 16:48
73,880
-1,733
25 Oct 2026, 20:35
75,613
-262
25 Oct 2026, 15:37
75,875
-717
24 Oct 2026, 19:59
76,592
-334
24 Oct 2026, 13:56
76,926
-1,187
23 Oct 2026, 22:27
78,113
-599
23 Oct 2026, 14:11
78,712
-830
22 Oct 2026, 22:16
79,542
first reading
Engagement
1,303 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 178 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.97%
avg views ÷ 66,059 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,260
438 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.223%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
438
of 1,303 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 435 of 438 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held
1,303 (6 August 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total
2,305,327
Reactions total
5,117
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈24,100
Videos
≈31,900
Links
≈32,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11h 17m
Average length
1m 03s
Measured directly from 645 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,348 reactions across 990 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,483
52.5%
👍
2,266
18.4%
🤣
973
7.88%
👏
569
4.61%
😡
462
3.74%
👎
456
3.69%
😢
360
2.92%
😱
333
2.70%
🔥
243
1.97%
😍
115
0.931%
💯
68
0.551%
🗿
20
0.162%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 993 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,348 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Махмуд Муродов бир ўзи Котларс оиласини 6 аъзосини тазирини берди
У жангларни узоққа чўзмай, тезда ғалаба қозонган.
💵 Маҳмуд Муродовга ушбу 6 кишига қарши жанглар учун унга 600 минг доллар пул берилган.
📹 Тўлиқ жангни кўролмаганлар, бемалол томоша қилинг!
ДЎСТЛАРГА ҲАМ ЮБОРИБ ҚЎЯМИЗ)
👉 💖 @ANDIJAN_BUGUN — Тезкор хабарлар каналига обуна бўлинг
👇
https://t.me/+r6jxShpq0tI3MTIy
#Даҳшат
Қашқадарёда аёлни болалари билан бирга бензин сепиб тириклайин ёқиб юборган эркак умрбодга қамалди.
Ғузор туманида аёл ва унинг тўрт нафар вояга етмаган фарзанди устига бензин сепиб, уларни шафқатсизларча ёқиб юборган шахс иши бўйича суд ҳукми эълон қилинди.
Фожиа оқибатида она ва икки фарзанд тирик қолган бўлса-да, оиланинг 6 ёшли ўғли ҳамда 11 ёшли қизи олинган оғир куйиш жароҳатлари туфайли вафот этган.
…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,303 posts we hold for @Andijan_Bugun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Andijan_Bugun edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 September 2026
Most recent edit
15 September 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Andijan_Bugun named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@umrachi_bilol named in 7 posts, 4 October 2026 – 15 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
ANDIJON BUGUN | АНДИЖОН БУГУН @andijon_bugun · 448,744#1
POLITIKA|UZ @politikauzofficial · 382 (as read 25 August 2026)#55
Xonobod shahar hokimligi MATBUOT XIZMATI @Xonobodpress · 2,077#56
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Andijonliklar TV | Расмий @Andijonliklar_TV · 199,707 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
Vodiyliklar biz | Rasmiy @VODIYLIKLAR_BIZ · 18,599 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 2 October 2026
Andijonliklar | Андижонликлар | Rasmiy kanal @andijonliklar · 117,729 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 13 August 2026
INSTAGRAM YULDUZLARI @instagram_yulduzlarim · 125,189 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 1 October 2026
ANDIJON24 | TEZKOR XABARLAR @andijonv · 50,073 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 20 September 2026
Andijonliklar 🇺🇿 @andijon · 190,563 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 20 September 2026
ANDIJON BUGUN | АНДИЖОН БУГУН @andijon_bugun · 448,744 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 August 2026
Farg'onaliklar 25 | РАСМИЙ @Fargonaliklar_Margilonliklar_24 · 67,253 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 August 2026
Surxondaryoliklar | Расмий канал @surxondaryoliklar · 32,778 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
VODIYLIKLAR @Vodiyliklar_Elonlar_Bozori_Qoqon · 26,855 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 September 2026
AXBOROT @axborotofficial · 55,785 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Андижон Бугун” (@Andijan_Bugun), 66,059 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Andijan_Bugun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.