Пойтахт аҳолиси яна 10 кун ифлос ҳаводан нафас олишга мажбур бўларкан.. Дўстларингизга улашинг! ✅ @Himoyachi1981
👍6❤5🤔4🥰4😍4😘3🙏2🔥1

Channel
@Himoyachi1981
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
27,530subscribers
+1,072 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002370109450 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Himoyachi1981 |
| Description | ⚖️ Каналимизга хуш келибсиз! Бу ерда сиз: ✅ Бепул ҳуқуқий маслаҳат оласиз. ✅ Қонунларни содда ва тушунарли тилда билиб оласиз. ✅ Муаммоларга биргаликда ечим излаймиз. Мурожаатларни шу иловага юборишингиз мумкин. @Himoyachi1981Ketmonov_bot |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 52 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Himoyachi1981 |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:14 | 27,530 | -228 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 27,758 | -97 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:06 | 27,855 | -105 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 05:05 | 27,960 | -201 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:29 | 28,161 | -411 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:05 | 28,572 | -131 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:14 | 28,703 | +1,619 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 27,084 | -254 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 03:41 | 27,338 | -1,831 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:49 | 29,169 | -108 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:51 | 29,277 | -41 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:45 | 29,318 | -278 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 29,596 | -40 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 04:17 | 29,636 | -135 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:41 | 29,771 | -660 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 30,431 | +4,375 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 03:21 | 26,056 | -223 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 19:58 | 26,279 | -366 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 26,645 | -3,051 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 29,696 | first reading |
651 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 133 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 651 (4 August 2026 – 29 October 2026) |
| Views total | 516,792 |
| Reactions total | 13,292 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Oct 2026, 13:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 154 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30,350 reactions across 649 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13,974 | 46.0% | |
| ❤ | 3,672 | 12.1% | |
| 🥰 | 2,990 | 9.85% | |
| 😘 | 2,816 | 9.28% | |
| 😍 | 2,705 | 8.91% | |
| 🔥 | 916 | 3.02% | |
| 🙏 | 708 | 2.33% | |
| 🤔 | 671 | 2.21% | |
| 💯 | 634 | 2.09% | |
| 👏 | 405 | 1.33% | |
| 😁 | 217 | 0.715% | |
| 🕊 | 175 | 0.577% | |
| 👌 | 82 | 0.27% | |
| 😢 | 65 | 0.214% | |
| 🤣 | 55 | 0.181% | |
| 🌚 | 27 | 0.089% | |
| 🙊 | 26 | 0.086% | |
| ⚡ | 22 | 0.072% | |
| 😱 | 22 | 0.072% | |
| 🙈 | 22 | 0.072% | |
| 32 further kinds | 146 | 0.481% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 649 of the 651 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,350 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 651 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пойтахт аҳолиси яна 10 кун ифлос ҳаводан нафас олишга мажбур бўларкан.. Дўстларингизга улашинг! ✅ @Himoyachi1981
👍6❤5🤔4🥰4😍4😘3🙏2🔥1
Биласизми... ❗️ Кимларни штатлар қисқариши муносабати билан ишдан бўшатиш мумкин эмас? Дўстларингизга улашинг! ✅ @Himoyachi1981
❤8👍8😍5🔥2😘2💯1🤔1🥰1
Ички ишлар вазирлигининг расмий баёноти Ижтимоий тармоқларда фуқароларнинг шахсга доир маълумотлари тарқалганлиги, жумладан, “AUTODOC” масъулияти чекланган жамияти томонидан ишлаб чиқилган ва операторлиги амалга ошириладиган “SAFE Service” (аввалги “Safe Road”) платформасига алоқадор маълумотлар ошкор бўлганлиги ҳақида хабарлар эълон қилинмоқда. Мазкур хабарларнинг ҳаққонийлигини аниқлаш, тарқатилаётган маълумотлар…
👍9😘6🥰5❤3💯2😍2🔥1🤯1
🔹 ЭЪЛОН Жорий йилнинг 30 октябрь куни соат 10:00 да Тошкент шаҳар ИИББ бошлиғи ўринбосари, полковник Мирсадиков Дилмурод Мирхамдамовичнинг жисмоний ва юридик шахсларнинг суд-ҳуқуқ ҳамда тергов, суриштирув билан боғлиқ масалалари юзасидан шахсий қабули ўтказилади. 🏢Манзил: Миробод тумани, Содиқ Азимов кўчаси, 87-уй. Дўстларингизга улашинг ✅ @Himoyachi1981
👍11😍6😘4🥰3🙏3❤1🔥1🤔1
Айтингчи.... Бугунги кунда ўзингизни қайси тоифага мансуб деб биласиз? — Ҳақиқатни айтишни истайдиган инсонми? — Ҳаётни кузатиб, ундан хулоса чиқарадиган инсонми? — Ёки кўнглидагиларни ичида сақлаб юриб, уларни ёзув орқали ифода этадиган инсонми? Дўстларингизга улашинг ✅ @Himoyachi1981
👍15😘6❤4😍4👏2💯2🥰2🔥1
“Лавозимдан қатъи назар, халқдан ажрамаган, қишлоқда ўсган одамман”, — деди Президент. Дўстларингизга улашинг! ✅ 📌 @Himoyachi1981
👍9❤8🥰7😘5💯2😍2🔥1🤔1
📌 7 ой 8 кун қамоқда ўтирган йигит оқланди: Иштихон туман суди гиёҳвандлик ишидаги далилларни сохта деб топди! 2026 йил 23 октябрда Иштихон туман суди ЖКнинг 273-моддаси 5-қисми (гиёҳвандлик моддасини сотиш) бўйича айбланган Ж.А.ни жиноятга дахли йўқлиги сабабли оқлади. У 15 мартдан бери, яъни 222 кун қамоқда сақланган эди. Айбловга кўра, у 14 март куни тезкор тадбирда 1,02 грамм мефедронни 300 АҚШ долларига сотган…
👍26😘7❤5🥰5😍3🔥2💯1🙏1
2 ой 6 кунлик кураш. Якун — айблов тугатилди☄️ Жиноят иши доирасида ҳимоям остидаги вояга етмаган М.А.га нисбатан қўйилган айблов бекор қилинди. Дастлабки тергов давомида Жиноят кодексининг 273-моддасида назарда тутилган жиноят аломатлари мавжуд эмаслиги аниқланди. Ҳимоя ҳуқуқининг ўз вақтида таъминланмагани, далилларнинг мақбуллиги билан боғлиқ масалалар, суд-психологик экспертизаси хулосаси ҳамда иш бўйича тўпла…
👍21❤10🥰4😍4💯3😘3👏2🔥2
#Мутолаа. Парвоз. У амал пиллапояларидан шиддат билан одимлаб борарди. Манcаби ошган сари қадди кўтарилар, юз ифодаси тобора жиддийлашиб борарди. Амал шабадаси уни ҳаволантирди — қаердан келганини ҳам унутиб, ортга қарамади. Иттифоқо, бир кун келиб, амалдан оёғи сал сирпанди. Курси синди, мансабда ўтиришга ярамай қолди. Ерга тушди. Бироқ энди у юришга қийналарди. Увишиб қолган оёқларининг чигилини ёзолмай, уйига …
👍27❤11😍4🔥3😘3👏2💯2🥰2
Кун ҳикмати Қора қоғозни ҳарчанд ювган билан оқ бўлмайди. Оқ қоғозни қора қилиш учун эса бир чизиқ тортиш кифоя. Қорани оқлаш эмас, оқни қораламаслик — адолатдир! ✍️ Ўткир Ҳошимов Ўзбекистон халқ ёзувчиси. Дўстларингизга улашинг ✅ @Himoyachi1981
👍28🥰7❤4😍4👏3🤔2😘2🔥1
Мушоҳада учун дақиқа. Аччиқ хақиқат... Дўстларингизга улашинг! ✅ 📌 @Himoyachi1981
👍20😍5😘5❤4🥰4🤔2👏1🔥1
Тайинловга қадар полковник М.Мирҳамидов ИИВ Тезкор қидирув департаменти бошлиғининг биринчи ӯринбосари лавозимида фаолият кӯрсатган. Дўстларингизга улашинг ✅ @Himoyachi1981
👍15🥰12😘5❤4😍2👏1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 651 posts we hold for @Himoyachi1981. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Himoyachi1981 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 79 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Қайси фуқароларга қўшимча уй-жой майдони миқдори кўпайтирилиши мумкин?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Фуқароларнинг айрим тоифаларига ижтимоий нормадан ортиқча қўшимча уй-жой майдони қандай миқдорда берилади?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Уй-жой майдонининг ижтимоий нормаси қайси кўрсаткич асосида белгиланади?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Уй-жой майдонининг ижтимоий нормаси кимлар томонидан белгиланади?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Турар жой мулкдорининг хотини (эри) оила аъзоси деб тан олиниши учун қайси шарт талаб этилади?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Турар жой мулкдорининг оила аъзолари деб кимлар тан олинади?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 651 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Himoyachi1981 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ҳимоячи Иқболиддин Кетмонов” (@Himoyachi1981), 27,530 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Himoyachi1981.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.