Channel
@Arameshdron
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,492subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001011440895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Arameshdron |
| Created | 6 January 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Arameshdron |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:55 | 7,492 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 7,491 | -9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:27 | 7,500 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 7,514 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:09 | 7,515 | +7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 7,508 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:06 | 7,509 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 7,512 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 7,503 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 7,504 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 7,507 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 7,507 | first reading |
133 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 65 of 74 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 133 (1 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,136 |
| Reactions total | 259 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
465 reactions across 111 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 174 | 37.4% | |
| ❤ | 171 | 36.8% | |
| 👏 | 52 | 11.2% | |
| 🥰 | 34 | 7.31% | |
| 😭 | 14 | 3.01% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 1.94% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 1.72% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.215% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 124 of the 133 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 542 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ازدواج های با ریسک طلاق *برای فرار از وضعیت ناراحتکننده خانه *وقتی خیلی جوان یا نابالغ هستید *وقتی به اندازه کافی تجربه ارتباط با جنس مخالف ندارید *وقتی تازه فارغالتحصیل شدهاید و هیچوقت بعنوان یک مجرد زندگی مستقلی را تجربه نکردهاید، هیچ کار یا طریق امرارمعاشی ندارید، *از تنها بودن میترسید یا طرفتان قرار است مدتی طولانی شما را ترک کند. *برای برانگیختن حس حسادت فردی دیگر *برای بالا بردن اعتمادبهنفستان *چو…
👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
کودک دیده نشده در بزرگسالی کودکی که در مراحل رشد خود به درستی درک نشده یا توجه کافی از والدین یا اطرافیانش دریافت نکرده، در بزرگسالی ممکن است با چالشهای روانی و احساسی متعددی مواجه شود. این کودکان، به دلیل عدم توجه و محبت کافی، حس ارزشمندی خود را از دست میدهند و در پی کسب تأیید و محبت به جستجوی آن میپردازند. این افراد در زندگی بزرگسالی خود ممکن است همواره در تلاش باشند تا برای رفتارها و عملکردهای خود توجیهاتی من…
❤2👍1
طبیعی هست که آغازها زیبا باشند زیرا منطقی نیست کسی نزدت بیاید و بگوید سلام من آدم پستی هستم داستایوفسکی @arameshdon🦩
👍2❤1
صبح بخیر به شمایی که با بودنتون دنیا رو قشنگ تر کردین🫶 @arameshdon🦩
❤2🥰2
باشد که امروز هر چه کاشتی؛ سبزتر، به تو بازگردد 💚 صبح بخیر
👍1🥰1
عادتهای فکریِ مخرب میتوانند به اندازهی عادتهای رفتاری غلط، آسیبزننده باشند و اغلب هم ما به اندازهی عادتهای رفتاری غلطمان، ملتفتِ عادتهای فکری غلطمان نیستیم. نگرانی در مورد همهچیز، نشخوار فکری، بدبینی، باید/نبایدهای ناکارآمد و دهها عادتِ ذهنی غلط دیگر مارا گرفتار خود کردهاند و چندان هم به آنها آگاه نیستیم. برای شروع، دقت کنید در چه موقعیتهایی بیشتر عصبانی، مضطرب یا غمگین میشوید؟ همان موقع، ذهن خود را…
👍3❤1🥰1
@zhuanchannel هر پولی که برای خوب غذا خوردن، خوب لباس پوشیدن و گشت و گذار در جهان خرج میکنید، هرگز هدر نمیرود؛ چون اینها هزینه نیستند. آنها سرمایهگذاریهایی در نحوه تجربه زندگی شما هستند. خوب غذا خوردن به شما انرژی، تمرکز اعتماد به نفس و طول عمر میدهد. شما فقط احساس بهتری ندارید، شما واقعاً بهتر میشوید. خوب لباس پوشیدن غرور نیست. احترام به خود است. نحوهی ارائهی شما، اینکه چطور خودتو نشون میدی؟ نحوهی حرکت …
👍4❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
من آن لحظه را می جویم که به دلکشی پرنده ایست.... لحظه ای عظیم , که ما در آن به یگانگی از دست رفته مان می نگریم، به انزوای محض انسان بودن به شکوه انسان بودن به شکوه نان قسمت کردن و معجزه ی از یاد رفته ی زنده بودن.... حکمت تائو
❤1👍1
سلام دوستان عزیزم صبح بقچه ی مهربانیش را باز کرده امروز هم لبخند خورشید سهم من و توست دلت که گرم شد🌞 در فنجان چای آدمها ، لبخند بریز☕️ صبحتون بخیر و شادمانی @arameshdon🦩
❤1👍1
⊱جذابیت او در این است که نمیکوشد موردِ پسند قرار گیرد. عادتی دارد: همیشه حقیقت را میگوید @arameshdon🦩
❤3🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @Arameshdron. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Arameshdron named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كانال روانشناسي آرامش درون🕊️” (@Arameshdron), 7,492 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Arameshdron.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.