International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 28 days, net +45,581. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,408–84,302 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 20:57
77,391
+45
1 Sept 2026, 16:08
77,346
+2,279
31 Aug 2026, 14:37
75,067
+246
30 Aug 2026, 15:24
74,821
+1,675
29 Aug 2026, 14:28
73,146
+1,759
28 Aug 2026, 12:32
71,387
+3,880
27 Aug 2026, 09:03
67,507
+1,819
26 Aug 2026, 11:49
65,688
+1,082
25 Aug 2026, 08:28
64,606
+1,168
24 Aug 2026, 06:48
63,438
+4,133
22 Aug 2026, 11:34
59,305
+9,185
20 Aug 2026, 22:42
50,120
-83
19 Aug 2026, 21:35
50,203
-169
18 Aug 2026, 22:24
50,372
-166
17 Aug 2026, 19:15
50,538
-138
16 Aug 2026, 17:16
50,676
-134
14 Aug 2026, 22:56
50,810
-127
13 Aug 2026, 11:15
50,937
-197
12 Aug 2026, 09:23
51,134
-142
11 Aug 2026, 07:21
51,276
first reading
Engagement
1,042 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.80%
avg views ÷ 77,391 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
1,041 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1,042
of 1,042 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1,022 of 1,041 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
1,042 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
1,452,827
Reactions total
29,735
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 04:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈14,400
Videos
≈9,320
Links
≈317
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2h 33m
Average length
53s
Measured directly from 172 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28,563 reactions across 979 posts, in 59 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💩
5,300
18.6%
👍
4,470
15.6%
❤
3,860
13.5%
🖕
3,126
10.9%
👏
3,063
10.7%
😁
1,489
5.21%
🤣
1,419
4.97%
🤬
1,201
4.20%
🔥
792
2.77%
🥰
555
1.94%
🤮
485
1.70%
👎
410
1.44%
💔
368
1.29%
🤡
278
0.973%
🍌
263
0.921%
😢
219
0.767%
🤔
154
0.539%
😐
99
0.347%
😱
84
0.294%
🌭
83
0.291%
39 further kinds
845
2.96%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 980 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,563 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 999 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Axiuos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇺🇸🇮🇷💢کریستوفر رایت، وزیر انرژی امریکا، درباره ایران:
راههای جایگزین دیگری نیز وجود خواهد داشت. نباید تمام تخمها را در یک سبد گذاشت.
شاید دنیا زمانی این وضعیت را در مورد تنگه هرمز داشت، اما رئیسجمهور ترامپ در حال تغییر این وضعیت است.
خطوط لوله جدیدی ساخته خواهند شد و خطوط لوله موجود گسترش خواهند یافت تا از استفاده مجدد ایران از تنگه هرمز در آینده جلوگیری شود.
اما در حال حاضر، نیروی دریایی ایالات متحده حملات ایران…
🇺🇸🇮🇷💢کریست رایت، وزیر انرژی امریکا، درباره ایران:
با ساخت زیرساختها، راههای بیشتری برای رسیدن این بشکهها به بازار ایجاد میشود.
ایران از این روش برای تلاش به منظور تحت فشار قرار دادن جهان استفاده کرده است، با این تفکر که «همه به خواستههای ایران تن خواهند داد». این یک خیال باطل است.
روز دوشنبه، نیروی دریایی ایالات متحده بیش از ۱۷ میلیون بشکه نفت خام را که از تنگه هرمز خارج میشدند، اسکورت کرد. این میزان بیشتر از …
آمریکا و امضای حق بهرهبرداری از ۶۵ میلیارد بشکه نفت.
ونزوئلا حق بهرهبرداری از ۱۷ میدان نفتی با حدود ۶۵ میلیارد بشکه ذخیره رو برای مدت خیلی طولانی به یک شرکت خصوصی داده و دولت آمریکا هم در اون شرکت سهم و حق خرید نفت با شرایط ویژه گرفته.
یعنی خلاصه ترامپ عملاً دست آمریکا رو گذاشته روی بخش خیلی بزرگی از نفت ونزوئلا
اینجوری خیالش از نفت و تنگه هرمز هم راحت میشه، به نظر شما مرحله بعدی برای چی آماده میشه؟
ادامه جنگ👍…
💢راننده جنسیس که در مشهد تجمعات رو زیر گرفته بود:
عمدی نبود، از تعادل خارج شدم و وقتی به یه نفر برخورد کردم دچار تشنج شدم و جا اینکه ترمز بگیرم، گاز دادم و یه دفعه همه رو زیر گرفتم
✅ @AXIUOS
#تاریخ
🔴 جورج اچ. دبلیو. بوش و جنگ خلیج فارس — 1991 🇺🇸
⚜️ در اوت 1991 ، عراق به کویت حمله کرد و بحرانی بینالمللی را برانگیخت. در دوران ریاست جمهوری جورج اچ. دبلیو. بوش، ایالات متحده رهبری یک ائتلاف بینالمللی بزرگ را بر عهده داشت که نیروهایی را به خلیج فارس اعزام میکرد.
⚜️ در ژانویه 1991 ، این ائتلاف عملیات طوفان صحرا را آغاز کرد و یک عملیات هوایی بزرگ علیه نیروهای عراقی را آغاز کرد. در فوریه یک حمله زمینی انجام…
⭕️شرکت Aerokon روسیه در حال توسعه یک رهگیر پرسه زن با موتور جت برای مقابله با پهپاد های انتحاری موتور جت و موشک ها کروز اوکراین است .این رهگیر شباهت زیادی به رهگیر ۳۵۸و۳۵۹ایرانی دارد
✅ @AXIUOS
👈آمریکا موشکهای کروز تاماهاوک را در نروژ مستقر کرده است
🔴بر اساس گزارشهای منتشرشده، آمریکا موشکهای کروز تاماهاوک را در نروژ و پرتابگرهای دیگری را در جزیره «یان ماین» مستقر کرده است.
🔴با توجه به برد این موشکها، بخشهایی از خاک روسیه میتواند در محدوده برد آنها قرار گیرد
✅ @AXIUOS
داخل بعضی از کامنت ها و پیامها میبینم بعضی ها هنوز مردد و نگران هستن و بقولی نمیدونن کجای بازار وایسادن ...
عزیزان، زمانی که دلار ۱۸۰ تومن بود گفتم دلار ۲۰۰ رو سوراخ میکنه و زمانی که از ۲۰۰ گذشت دیگه کسی جلودارش نیست و بسرعت میریم بسمت ۲۱۰ و ۲۲۰ و ...
الان هم میگم منتظر موج بعدی باشید و خودتون رو آماده کنید...
اوضاع خوب نیست.
🇺🇸🇺🇸 سنتکام اعلام کرد نیروهای آمریکایی از زمان تشدید محاصره بنادر ایران، برای اطمینان از رعایت مقررات، مسیر ۸۶ کشتی تجاری را تغییر داده، ۳ کشتی را از کار انداخته و ۲ کشتی را بازرسی کردهاند.
این آمار نسبت به گزارش روز سهشنبه، ۲ کشتی بیشتر شده است.
@AXIUOS
👏21❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,042 posts we hold for @Axiuos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
هم میهنان عزیزی که لطف کردید و چنل ما را انتخاب کردید، آیا دوست دارید یک گروه به چنل متصل کنم تا بتونید در گروه انتقادات و پیشنهادات خودتان را ارسال کنید؟
بله 👍48%
خیر 👎27%
فرقی نداره 🤷♀🤷26%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 116,537 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
اتحاد ملی ایران | اخبار جنگ @OmidIranAzad · 55,522 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
همگام با رضاشاه دوم @siasattalkh · 63,322 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 August 2026
حاشیه نیوز @hashiyeh_news24 · 59,279 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
تـاریخ ایـران بـا نـادر شـاه @naader_shah · 50,196 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
ملی گرایان مردم گرا @Mellig · 163,830 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
ارتش دفاعى اسرائيل @idfinfarsi · 98,081 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار نظامی ایران و جهان / جنگ” (@Axiuos), 77,391 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Axiuos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.