عندگ واتساب 💚.

Channel
أذكـــــــــــــــــــــــار
@Azkarkm
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
40,292subscribers
-1,158 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001108838108 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Azkarkm |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 10 October 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 40 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Azkarkm |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 17:27 | 40,292 | -50 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 03:59 | 40,342 | -94 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 40,436 | -155 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 23:02 | 40,591 | -127 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 40,718 | -50 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 40,768 | -38 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 40,806 | -23 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 40,829 | -22 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 40,851 | -57 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:35 | 40,908 | -77 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 40,985 | -42 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 41,027 | -34 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:44 | 41,061 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:44 | 41,069 | -20 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 41,089 | -14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 41,103 | -15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 41,118 | -21 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 41,139 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:37 | 41,150 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 41,154 | first reading |
Engagement
435 posts held, back to 10 October 2017 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 128 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.021%
- avg views ÷ 40,292 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8.6
- 160 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 160
- of 435 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 435 (10 October 2017 – 13 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,382 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Oct 2026, 16:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1h 13m
- Average length
- 1h 13m
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🤔 لغز فقهى دخل رجل مسن مجلس وسئل من فيه كم عدد الصلوات المفروضة في اليوم و الليلة وقد تحصل على اجابة من 4 اشخاص وكلهم اجابو اجابة صحيحة والغريب في الامر ان الاول قال 11 ركعة والثاني قال 15 ركعة و الثالث قال 17 ركعة و الرابع قال 19 ركعة فكيف كان ذلك؟ 👈لمعرفة الأجابة أضغط هنا 👉
ما لون بقرة بني اسرائيل المذكورة في القرآن ؟ ❔. ◯ - صفراء ◯ ـ سوداء ◯ ـ بيضاء.
شاهد اكتشاف مصحفاً يعود إلى 1400 سنة.. وتصريح خطير من علماء ألمانيا! . 📚 ⬇️ 🌼 T.me/addlist/_-FJz3iZ655jMjJh
خاصة بالواتس اب 😇👇 .
انت ولد ولا بنت ؟ .
عندگ واتساب 💚.
🤔 لغز فقهى دخل رجل مسن مجلس وسئل من فيه كم عدد الصلوات المفروضة في اليوم و الليلة وقد تحصل على اجابة من 4 اشخاص وكلهم اجابو اجابة صحيحة والغريب في الامر ان الاول قال 11 ركعة والثاني قال 15 ركعة و الثالث قال 17 ركعة و الرابع قال 19 ركعة فكيف كان ذلك؟ 👈لمعرفة الأجابة أضغط هنا 👉
تقول معلمة ... 😂😂 أقرضت إحدى زميلاتي في عملي السابق مبلغا من المال.. ولما بدأت أطالبها به بدأت تتجاهل الرد على مكالماتي.... في أحد الأيام هتفت لها أكثر من 15 مرة ما كانت ترد على مكالماتي عندها ولمعرفتي أن زوجها كان خارج المنزل قررت إرسال رسالة لها كتبت فيها " مرحبا حبيبتي أنا لست أكلمك عن المال الذي بيننا أنا فقط أردت أن أخبرك أني رأيت زوجك مع فتاة جميلة جدا في السوق ركبت معه في سيارته "... تكملة القصة من هنا 🏃♂
ما لون بقرة بني اسرائيل المذكورة في القرآن ؟ ❔. ◯ - صفراء ◯ ـ سوداء ◯ ـ بيضاء.
لماذا يلهث الكلب؟ معجزة عجيبة سوف تذهلك😨 ⬇️ 🔗 T.me/addlist/_-FJz3iZ655jMjJh
تقول احداهن : صليت من أجلهِ صلاة إستخارة ليطمئن قلبي فانقبض ورأيته يخنقني في الحلم قمت فزعة أسرعت ألى هاتفي واتصلت به، أخبرته أنني......لـ قراءة المزيد اضغط هُنا اليوم بعد سنة جاء يعترف لي بأنه لم يكن ينوي… قراءة المَزيد إضغط هُنا. اضغـــ💍 لمعرفة المزيد💍ــــط اضغـــ💍 لمعرفة المزيد💍ــــط
Showing the 12 most recent of 435 posts we hold for @Azkarkm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Azkarkm named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@alssalihina · 21,950#1
@alrouqiaa · 22,617#2
@rwath · 30,139#3
@OT3543 · 26,888#4
@Rayahin3 · 31,891#5
@Eshraqatf · 29,554#6
@l7jrlli · 5,219#7
@AHALALALM · 20,155#8
@adilmy · 510 (as read 29 August 2026)#9
@Bukhari_Blog · 766 (as read 29 August 2026)#10
@alaaaartyuiytruiiuytuyyu · 12,324#11
@omrihan · 825#12
@ran0_0n · 2,318#13
@Aauchi5 · 24,735#14
@sawtiat · 639 (as read 29 August 2026)#15
@fatanfa3ahuthikra · 804#16
@yxcasqw · 4#17
@rwoserzm · 739#18
@ar_j2001_313_313_0 · 7,627#19
@to_ohoody · 1,804#20
@Ssabako · 4,126#21
@AL_SHAME_9 · 2,254#22
@NNFAE · 1,860#23
@camp193 · 366#24
@ktofemanya · 3,500#25
@durus_dinia · 36,086#26
@h0ugufyguf · 5,645#27
@lmastt · 8,978#28
@bidharat · 3,302#29
@medical_too · 21,067#30
@fghjuhh · 5,427#31
@almufarredon · 2,579#32
@thaermohamd13 · 3,307#33
@L_i_0n · 34,005#34
@kalbe19997 · 16,867#35
@mostashar_zefaaf · 1,846#36
@Badrtkhair00 · 3,261#37
@forat_al_77 · 8,958#38
@taghreed_sunoqrot2023 · 3,651#39
@ashooooof · 8,082#40
@Quranieah · 5,347#41
@ghawaly57r · 26,675#42
@Medical_Books_11 · 2,369#43
@katarmmm · 4,601#44
@ghalyah7 · 28,088#45
@nn_vx · 10,049#46
@be_happy775 · 11,657#47
@boodyay · 13,369#48
@trabasalah · 10,258#49
@fus_ha · 3,865#50
@Zad_Alqloob_Channel · 38,753#51
@alsham_5o · 14,296#52
@nawzat12345 · 3,048#53
@Dontbesad1445 · 3,774#54
@MAshrafAminDM · 1,491#55
@GhadaKhayatdxn · 2,334#56
@Thaira_16 · 1,024#57
@remedies20 · 1,352#58
@herba_medicine · 2,210#59
@mawsuat_alamam_abn_baz · 871#60
@mawsuat_sh_alfawzan · 907#61
@dodo_0707 · 763#62
@mosab299 · 3,422#63
@sicolojoy · 4,251#64
@sadiqalmuraghamy · 1,896#65
@salfibook · 2,268#66
@qudsalhawa · 725#67
@heeeeam8 · 1,446#68
@Nor2262005a · 4,627#69
@AlilajBarogea · 3,486#70
@Irtegaa · 1,229#71
@maulames · 6,970#72
@reqaa66 · 11,379#73
@yrmzswa · 5,465#74
@men_of_treth · 404#75
@morngajo · 1,271#76
@complimentary_Medicine · 1,637#77
@masterpiecesofmedicine · 609#78
@kutubalssna1445 · 1,199#79
@zitacademy · 3,877#80
@advisorchanell · 2,737#81
@Fataawo · 8,778#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@alssalihina · 21,950
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 September 2026
@alrouqiaa · 22,617
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 September 2026
@OT3543 · 26,888
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
@Rayahin3 · 31,891
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
@durus_dinia · 36,086
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 September 2026
@rwath · 30,139
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 7 September 2026
@Zad_Re · 71,039
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
@Eshraqatf · 29,554
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
@AHALALALM · 20,155
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 September 2026
@L_i_0n · 34,005
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
@medical_too · 21,067
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 September 2026
@saaid_so · 21,630
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 September 2026
@tar_ah5 · 21,707
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 September 2026
@ghalyah7 · 28,088
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 September 2026
@Hsoi4 · 86,628
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 August 2026
@ahoof · 37,719
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
@D_Alkhashyn · 25,601
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
@Q_urany · 44,469
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
@formykids · 31,478
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
@Zad_Alqloob_Channel · 38,753
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 31 August 2026
@RabieaAlqloob · 22,215
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
@Aauchi5 · 24,735
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 September 2026
@life_a0 · 38,241
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 1 September 2026
@yourheart3333 · 20,322
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أذكـــــــــــــــــــــــار” (@Azkarkm), 40,292 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Azkarkm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.