Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chainfor Trading News (정보공유채널)

Channel

Chainfor Trading News (정보공유채널)

@ChainforNews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,580subscribers

-412 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001391924684
TypeChannel
Username@ChainforNews
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ChainforNews

Growth

7,5807,9927,7867 August 2026 — 7,992 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,992 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,977 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,888 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,825 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,773 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,714 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,668 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,600 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,580 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 22 days, net -412. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,518–8,054 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 12:087,580-20
26 Aug 2026, 17:127,600-68
23 Aug 2026, 13:477,668-46
20 Aug 2026, 05:147,714-59
17 Aug 2026, 09:287,773-52
14 Aug 2026, 00:557,825-63
11 Aug 2026, 04:237,888-89
8 Aug 2026, 11:327,977-15
7 Aug 2026, 18:167,992no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:087,992first reading

Engagement

51 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.20%
avg views ÷ 7,580 subscribers
Avg views / post
319
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.462%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 51 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 45 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held51 (28 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total14,335
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC224 viewsread 28 August 2026

운은 하나가 아니다: 성공을 가르는 천운·지운·인운 통제할 수 없는 천운은 받아들이고, 환경과 선택에서 비롯되는 지운과 인운은 의도적으로 키울 수 있다는 것이 글의 결론이다. 1️⃣ 태어난 패는 바꿀 수 없어도 관점은 바꿀 수 있다 천운은 출생지·가정·재능처럼 선택할 수 없는 조건이며, 죄책감이나 자기혐오보다 현실을 인정하고 해석의 기준을 조정하는 일이 중요하다. 2️⃣ 좋은 환경은 기회와 만날 면적을 넓힌다 지운은 거주지·직장·인맥처럼 자신이 놓인 시스템으로, 더 역동적이고 다양한 환경을 선택하면 우연한 기회를 발견할 가능성도 커진다. 3️⃣ 같은 패도 대응에 따라 결과가 달라진다 인운은 눈앞의 확률에 어떻게 대응하고 상황에 얼마나 잘 적응하는가를 뜻하며, 포커에서 받은 카드보다 테이블 선택과 플레이가 중요한 것에 비유된다. 4️⃣

26 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC188 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @coinnesskr

[선물·현물 가격 차 확대에 비트와이즈 크립토 캐리 펀드 수익률 5.9% 기록] 시장 중립형 가상자산 펀드인 '비트와이즈 크립토 캐리 펀드(USCC)'의 최근 30일 기준 연 수익률이 선물 베이시스(선물과 현물 간 가격 차이) 확대로 인해 5.9%까지 상승했다. 해당 펀드는 BTC, ETH 등 주요 현물을 매수함과 동시에 선물 계약을 매도하여 방향성 리스크 없이 현·선물 프리미엄 차익을 얻는 '캐시 앤 캐리' 전략을 활용한다. 여기에 유동성 스테이킹 자산(weETH, JitoSOL)을 결합해 추가 수익을 확보한다. 암호화폐 시장 내 강세 심리로 인해 선물 프리미엄이 확대되면서 차익 거래 수익률이 크게 증가한 영향이다. 현재 해당 펀드의 운용 자산은 약 1억 3,770만 달러 규모다. 비트와이즈가 지난 6월 슈퍼스테이트로부터 운용권을 인수한 이

26 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC221 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @BChoSNPhoto

"엘살바도르, 비트코인 결제는 사실상 말라버려" 출처 국가에서 장려해도 비트코인 결제는 대중화가 힘들다는게 증명되는 중 가치 저장 수단 + 인플레 헷지 정도지 화폐는 힘들지 않을까요?

25 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC250 viewsread 28 August 2026

좋은 교양 내용이라 공유 인 전쟁 우리가 아는 대부분의 똥 원료 이야기를 재밌게 스토리 텔링함 https://youtu.be/P_C-foYPI-w?si=-NL1AXuSvf6MkL2A

24 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC266 viewsread 28 August 2026

8월 24일 비트코인 살펴보기 https://naver.me/Fx2rXROt

22 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC277 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @AurumResearch

비대해진 자아 1. 오래된 투자자의 마지막 - 각별한 사이였던 한 투자자의 오랜 투자가 반토막 끝에 막을 내림 - 실력이 모자라서가 아니라 거듭된 성공이 만든 지나친 자기 확신 때문이었음 - 성공을 안겨준 방식, 그리고 그걸 읽어낸 자기 눈에 대한 확신이 문제였음 - 다만 시장을 떠난 뒤 목소리는 오히려 가벼워짐 — 불행인지 아닌지는 지금 알기 어려움 2. 자아가 커지는 과정 - 처음에는 모르는 게 많다는 걸 알아서 남의 말도 듣고 책도 읽고 배우려 함 - 한 번 크게 벌고 두 번 맞히고 몇 년 성과가 이어지면 사람이 모이기 시작함 - 반대 의견이 불편해지고, 성과가 못한 사람의 말은 들을 필요 없다고 여기게 됨 - 어느 순간 자기 생각과 자기 자신을 구분하지 못함 — 종목에 대한 반박이 나에 대한 공격으로 느껴짐 3. 투자가 뒤집히

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @ChainforNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chainfor Trading News (정보공유채널)” (@ChainforNews), 7,580 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChainforNews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.