Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
35.5 average views per post against 42,238 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.084%. Across the 2,093 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,988 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 1.65% and 11.8%, with a median of 5.13%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (30 July 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Posts measured
280 of 280 published in the window (280 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
9,935
Mature posts only
1.00% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 29 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 23 days, net -345. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,186–42,635 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 11:53
42,238
-15
28 Aug 2026, 08:17
42,253
-8
27 Aug 2026, 08:13
42,261
-4
26 Aug 2026, 07:43
42,265
-25
25 Aug 2026, 06:51
42,290
-33
24 Aug 2026, 07:46
42,323
-26
22 Aug 2026, 18:23
42,349
-33
21 Aug 2026, 05:27
42,382
-20
20 Aug 2026, 04:42
42,402
-26
19 Aug 2026, 02:07
42,428
-24
17 Aug 2026, 23:56
42,452
-37
16 Aug 2026, 21:55
42,489
-13
15 Aug 2026, 12:34
42,502
-23
14 Aug 2026, 00:26
42,525
-3
12 Aug 2026, 18:23
42,528
-31
11 Aug 2026, 15:03
42,559
+3
10 Aug 2026, 13:28
42,556
-13
9 Aug 2026, 10:32
42,569
+7
8 Aug 2026, 10:00
42,562
-15
7 Aug 2026, 07:03
42,577
first reading
Engagement
293 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.084%
avg views ÷ 42,238 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.5
280 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
280
of 293 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
293 (12 July 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
9,935
Reactions total
542
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
502
Videos
185
Links
170
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
564 reactions across 275 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
248
44.0%
💯
234
41.5%
🍓
34
6.03%
🕊
30
5.32%
👀
18
3.19%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 293 of the 293 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 579reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 293 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤔 لغز فقهى
دخل رجل مسن مجلس
وسئل من فيه كم عدد الصلوات المفروضة في اليوم و الليلة
وقد تحصل على اجابة من 4 اشخاص وكلهم اجابو اجابة صحيحة
والغريب في الامر
ان الاول قال 11 ركعة
والثاني قال 15 ركعة
و الثالث قال 17 ركعة
و الرابع قال 19 ركعة
فكيف كان ذلك؟
👈لمعرفة الأجابة أضغط هنا 👉
- قال تعالى : ﴿هَلْ أَتَاكَ حَدِيثُ الْغَاشِيَةِ﴾
ما المقصود بالغاشية ؟..
◯ وقفة عـرفة.
◯ القـيامة.
◯ السـماء.
👍1
Signed مجلد دعم جميع القنوات
Showing the 12 most recent of 293 posts we hold for @Featuredselections. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 762,985 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
أَرِيــ♡ــج ﭐلــورد..🌼💙 @Areej7yaman · 41,905 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
📕 تعلم الانجليزية 📕 @English7711 · 49,772 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
وَمَا كَانَ رَبُّكَ نَسِيًّا ⚘ @GirlCreed · 57,534 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
كنوز المعرفة والمعلومات والخواطر @konuz2020 · 82,003 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
العَودةُ إلىَ اللَّه' @masnneah · 45,887 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
💦 ️الإعجاز القرآني بالصوَر @ijazQurany · 67,948 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
أغرد بصمت @AlsharabiN · 56,172 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
💢قال الحبيب محمد ﷺ💢🌙 @raa66 · 57,078 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
دُرُوبُ الــخَـــيْــرِ🌱 @cfjfjkodod · 45,742 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
👌 جدد حياتك 😍 @renewyourlive · 45,376 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
تعلم اللغة الإنجليزية @Learn3English · 51,129 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
🎀كلمات مؤثرة🎀🌙 @ramk898 · 88,223 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 August 2026
تعليم اللغة الانجليزية @Einglish_ra · 89,067 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
👑 خواطر من ذهب 👑 @goold2009 · 68,020 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
• فَـذَكِّـر ||' @Mention_of_God · 46,748 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
كلمات انجليزي مترجمة @English259 · 51,177 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
تعلم الإنجليزية @English_201 · 75,618 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚘ قدوتي الصحابيات 💎” (@Featuredselections), 42,238 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Featuredselections.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
