Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for *•.¸♡ جماليات ♡¸.•*

Channel

*•.¸♡ جماليات ♡¸.•*

@aaqwal

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,018subscribers

-87 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001613415904
TypeChannel
Username@aaqwal
Descriptionمَأوَىٰ الْإِنْسَانِ رَبُّهُ💗.❣ بوت تواصل @JamaliaatBot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/aaqwal

Growth

19,00219,17619,0897 August 2026 — 19,105 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,105 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,098 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,086 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,067 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,087 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,114 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,078 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,063 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,042 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,022 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,002 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,010 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,058 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,149 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,176 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,139 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,098 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,073 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,055 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,036 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,018 subscribers19,0187 August 202628 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 21 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,976–19,202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 19:4519,018-18
27 Aug 2026, 22:1919,036-19
27 Aug 2026, 00:4819,055-18
25 Aug 2026, 22:5519,073-25
24 Aug 2026, 22:3819,098-41
23 Aug 2026, 11:1819,139-37
22 Aug 2026, 00:1319,176+27
20 Aug 2026, 17:4219,149+91
19 Aug 2026, 20:0319,058+48
18 Aug 2026, 20:4619,010+8
17 Aug 2026, 20:4719,002-20
16 Aug 2026, 19:3519,022-20
15 Aug 2026, 07:5819,042-21
14 Aug 2026, 00:4519,063-15
12 Aug 2026, 21:5719,078-36
11 Aug 2026, 18:2219,114+27
10 Aug 2026, 21:5319,087+20
9 Aug 2026, 20:5219,067-19
8 Aug 2026, 18:0219,086-12
7 Aug 2026, 17:4419,098first reading

Engagement

166 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.638%
avg views ÷ 19,018 subscribers
Avg views / post
121
163 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
163
of 166 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held166 (29 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total19,765
Reactions total1,121
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 11:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,010
Videos
200
Links
327

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,145 reactions across 166 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
28725.1%
👍24321.2%
🥰24321.2%
😍21418.7%
🔥292.53%
🕊262.27%
🎉201.75%
🐳131.14%
❤‍🔥121.05%
👏121.05%
🤩110.961%
💯100.873%
💘40.349%
👌30.262%
😢30.262%
🤨30.262%
👎20.175%
😱20.175%
🤓20.175%
🏆10.087%
5 further kinds50.437%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 166 of the 166 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 166 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aaqwal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 166 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC5 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026

من هي المرأة الوحيدة التي ذُكر اسمها صريحًا في القرآن الكريم؟ 1- عائشة. 2- آسية. 3- مريم.

🥰21👍1🤩1😍1

Signed - دعِم طَيبـة .

29 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC7 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026

لو قلبك متعب 💔🥹… أو حاسس إنك مو بخير… أو حتى مو قادر تشرح اللي داخلك… لو ضاقت فيك الدنيا أو كثرت عليك الهموم… أو حسّيت إنك تايه ومحتاج طمأنينة… تذكّر إن في كلام يخفف، وفي قلوب تفهم، وفي أمل ممكن يرجع يحييك من جديد بإذن الله 🤍 مكانك بيننا… تابع/ي القناة يمكن تلقى فيها شيء يلامس قلبك ويهدي شعورك🥹👇🏻 https://t.me/MokTiraT

👍31🎉1🔥1🥰1

Signed ـ دعم الرّيّان .

28 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC1 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

من هي المرأة الوحيدة التي ذُكر اسمها صريحًا في القرآن الكريم؟ 1- عائشة. 2- آسية. 3- مريم.

😍41👍1🤩1🥰1

Signed - دعِم طَيبـة .

28 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC2 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

لو قلبك متعب 💔🥹… أو حاسس إنك مو بخير… أو حتى مو قادر تشرح اللي داخلك… لو ضاقت فيك الدنيا أو كثرت عليك الهموم… أو حسّيت إنك تايه ومحتاج طمأنينة… تذكّر إن في كلام يخفف، وفي قلوب تفهم، وفي أمل ممكن يرجع يحييك من جديد بإذن الله 🤍 مكانك بيننا… تابع/ي القناة يمكن تلقى فيها شيء يلامس قلبك ويهدي شعورك🥹👇🏻 https://t.me/MokTiraT

1👍1🔥1🕊1🥰1

Signed ـ دعم الرّيّان .

28 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC62 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026

- كن قوياً ، لا تعطي قيمه لمن لا قيمة له.

3👍2👏1🕊1😍1

Signed فـريـ𝒇𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒅ـد‌‌𓆩🤎𓆪.

28 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC81 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🔺قال صلى الله عليه وسلم: "وفيه - أي الجمعة - ساعة لا يوفقها عبد مسلم يصلي - أي يدعو - فيسأل الله فيها شيئا إلا أعطاه إياه" رواه أحمد وأبو داود والنسائي. 🔺قال عبدالله بن سلام:" أنا أعلم بتلك الساعة .. هي: بعد العصر إلى أن تغرب الشمس" 🔺ويقول أحد السلف: "ما دعوت الله بدعوة بين العصر والمغرب يوم الجمعة، إلا استجاب لي ربي حتى استحييت!" 🔺وكان طاووس بن كيسان إذا صلى العصر يوم الجمعة، استقبل القبلة، ولم يكلم أحدًا حتى تغ

👍2🥰21💯1😍1

Signed 𓍢ִ໋🌷͙֒ أم جُويرية

28 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC3 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

ادخلوا القناة والله من أفضل القنوات اللي مرت علي فيها كلام يشرح الصدر ويجبر الخاطر ويبعث الأمل في القلب. الله يجزاهم خير ويبارك لهم فيما يقدمون.🤍🌷 https://t.me/deeen_1234

4😍2🎉1👍1

Signed - دعِم طَيبـة .

28 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC8 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

ماهو أول مسجد وضع على الأرض...؟

👍31🤩1😍1

Signed بوت تواصل

28 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC8 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026

ما هي الصلاة التي لا ركوع لها 🤔؟!.

2😍2❤‍🔥1🥰1

Signed ـ دعم الرّيّان .

27 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC2 views5 reactionsread 27 August 2026

ادخلوا القناة والله من أفضل القنوات اللي مرت علي فيها كلام يشرح الصدر ويجبر الخاطر ويبعث الأمل في القلب. الله يجزاهم خير ويبارك لهم فيما يقدمون.🤍🌷 https://t.me/deeen_1234

🥰21👍1😍1

Signed - دعِم طَيبـة .

27 Aug 2026, 22:41 UTC2 views7 reactionsread 27 August 2026

ماهو أول مسجد وضع على الأرض...؟

👍3🥰21😍1

Signed بوت تواصل

27 Aug 2026, 22:40 UTC2 views7 reactionsread 27 August 2026

ما هي الصلاة التي لا ركوع لها 🤔؟!.

🥰3👍2🎉1😍1

Signed ـ دعم الرّيّان .

Showing the 12 most recent of 166 posts we hold for @aaqwal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

👌 جدد حياتك 😍
@renewyourlive · 45,376
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
⚘ قدوتي الصحابيات 💎
@Featuredselections · 42,238
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“*•.¸♡ جماليات ♡¸.•*” (@aaqwal), 19,018 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aaqwal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.