انت ولد ولا بنت ؟!

Channel
مواساة لقلبك | ☁️❤️
@heart_a0
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
55,541subscribers
+683 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001050972536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @heart_a0 |
| Description | ستبقى ألطاف الله دائماً تلاٌحقك ، دوُن أن تُدرك. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2016 and 31 January 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/heart_a0 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 55,541 | -58 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 55,599 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 55,601 | -67 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 55,668 | -51 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 55,719 | -14 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 55,733 | +75 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:16 | 55,658 | +55 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 55,603 | +43 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:33 | 55,560 | +20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 55,540 | +50 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 55,490 | -46 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 55,536 | -61 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 55,597 | -33 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 55,630 | +73 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 55,557 | +42 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 55,515 | -61 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 55,576 | -121 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 55,697 | +32 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 55,665 | +142 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 55,523 | first reading |
Engagement
323 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.47%
- avg views ÷ 55,541 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 815
- 210 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.84%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 210
- of 323 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 50 of 210 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 323 (29 July 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 171,232 |
| Reactions total | 3,037 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Sept 2026, 03:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,230
- Videos
- ≈1
- Links
- ≈112
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
5,850 reactions across 89 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,012 | 51.5% | |
| 💘 | 736 | 12.6% | |
| 👍 | 398 | 6.80% | |
| 🍓 | 344 | 5.88% | |
| 💯 | 199 | 3.40% | |
| 🆒 | 178 | 3.04% | |
| 🕊 | 156 | 2.67% | |
| ❤🔥 | 149 | 2.55% | |
| 🔥 | 96 | 1.64% | |
| 👏 | 94 | 1.61% | |
| 😍 | 68 | 1.16% | |
| 🙉 | 62 | 1.06% | |
| 😘 | 54 | 0.923% | |
| 🥰 | 45 | 0.769% | |
| 🤝 | 44 | 0.752% | |
| ⚡ | 38 | 0.65% | |
| 🎉 | 38 | 0.65% | |
| 😎 | 31 | 0.53% | |
| 👌 | 24 | 0.41% | |
| 😭 | 24 | 0.41% | |
| 8 further kinds | 60 | 1.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 323 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 323 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
تمت إزالتك ❓❗️
Video, posted without a caption
💘1
انت ولد ولا بنت ؟!
تمت إزالتك ❓❗️
اللهم بارك في هذه القناة 🎉 لِمن يُحبّ العلم، ويأنس بكلام العلماء، ويبحث عن شيءٍ يُعينه على الثبات في طريق الطلب 👇🏻 https://t.me/Trkis_Ahmad
اللهم بارك في هذه القناة 🎉 لِمن يُحبّ العلم، ويأنس بكلام العلماء، ويبحث عن شيءٍ يُعينه على الثبات في طريق الطلب 👇🏻 https://t.me/Trkis_Ahmad
انت ولد ولا بنت ؟!
تمت إزالتك ❓❗️
اللهم بارك في هذه القناة 🎉 لِمن يُحبّ العلم، ويأنس بكلام العلماء، ويبحث عن شيءٍ يُعينه على الثبات في طريق الطلب 👇🏻 https://t.me/Trkis_Ahmad
❤1
اللهم بارك في هذه القناة 🎉 لِمن يُحبّ العلم، ويأنس بكلام العلماء، ويبحث عن شيءٍ يُعينه على الثبات في طريق الطلب 👇🏻 https://t.me/Trkis_Ahmad
إنضمّـوا لها وانشروا قنَاتها في كل مكان ليعُمَّ النفع قناتها كنننززززززز بمعنى الكلمة ونَـافعه 🌸🩵🌧️🌱! https://t.me/mmkk7890fg
Showing the 12 most recent of 323 posts we hold for @heart_a0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@cciiaa_a0 · 41,89068 postsمع القرآن 🌿.
@life_a0 · 37,45268 postsفتاة بين القهوة والورد☕💐.
@moon_07k · 42,38267 postsملاذنا الله🌧🌿💛
@sky_07k · 40,23367 postsغُصن مُزهر🍃
@cloud_a6 · 40,69763 postsحب وقهوة❤️🎀
@soul_550 · 39,91263 postsمع الله🌿📮
@happy_a5 · 17,17443 postsرسالة اليوم✉️🌱
@happy_a90 · 16,92016 postsزحمة شعور📫🌿
@ii2i2a · 16,48510 postsضحى💜🌿Space
@Duha_Space · 3393 postsلعلها إشارة من الله لك🩵
@ziiii50 · 2,1813 postsنبراس الهدى
@mafatiheljana · 531 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 160 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@zad_alkhayr2 · 51,78212 posts🌸فتاوى العِشْرة الزوجيَّة🌸
@Fatawa_Aleshrah_Azzawjyya · 15,23511 postsفـيح الســـطـور
@Fehlines · 14,51411 postsويبقى الأثر 📚
@minhaj_assalaf · 16,79111 postsْمختاراتٌ شعريّة وأَدَبيّة
@MokTiraT · 56,82011 postsاللَّهُمّ جنتك.
@allahomajantk · 81,23810 posts🌸 القرآن ربيع القلوب 🌸
@RabieaAlqloob · 21,42010 postsالصُحْبَة الْصَالِحَة 🌸
@Apdalmagld · 58,0629 postsمَناراتُ الـعُلا 🕊🍃
@manarat_alola · 72,8979 postsرُوح 🔻🤍
@rouh61 · 12,9789 posts*•.¸♡ جماليات ♡¸.•*
@aaqwal · 18,6468 postsأهـلُ الـتـوحـيـد
@altawheed1l · 23,5228 postsفتاة بين القهوة والورد☕💐.
@moon_07k · 42,3828 postsزاد الآخرة
@Zad_Re · 71,8878 postsالطِبُ بالرُقْيَةِ الشَرعيةِ وعُلُومُهَا
@FAfASmo · 13,5187 posts• المُؤنِسَاتُ الغَالِيَاتْ
@mwansat_2 · 44,1777 posts☀️إشــــــ الصباح ـــــــراقـة ☀️
@aishraqat · 39,9626 postsالقرآن الكريم
@AlBadr12 · 7,2766 postsبَوحُ الرُوح
@Bo7_alroo7 · 45,7146 postsلا تحزن ⚘
@fffth · 11,9366 postsعِبْرَةً لِمَنْ يَخْشَى.)
@Hkaiate_02023 · 19,6576 postsمَا وُلِدْنَا لِنَنْهَزِمَ┊ᥫ᭡
@just_smile3 · 19,2596 posts🕯 مــعـرفـة الــصــحـابـة🕯
@mareft_alsahaba · 10,4606 postsحب وقهوة❤️🎀
@soul_550 · 39,9126 posts
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@alqanitatalsaalihat · 3,3978 postsقناة مجالس العلم الشرعي
@Alqari_alsaghir · 22,0778 postsقناة/ أحمد الترك ( أبو عبد الملك التركي الحنبلي)
@Trkis_Ahmad · 3,5078 posts| هِدآيــﮧ . . .
@hedaiaah · 3,2005 postsالصُحْبَة الْصَالِحَة 🌸
@Apdalmagld · 58,0624 postsأسئلة دينية 💜
@deeen_1234 · 13,2303 postsفاذْكُرُوا آلاء الله لعلّكم تُفلحون 🌸🍃
@fawa2d_al_3oulama2 · 2,8313 postsآهْـلُ اللهِ وَخَـاصَتةْ 💙
@Koraaniii · 22,2643 postsْمختاراتٌ شعريّة وأَدَبيّة
@MokTiraT · 56,8203 postsزاد الآخرة
@Zad_Re · 71,8873 postsمَرابِعُ النُّور ||🕯📖
@Fatima_Aradeh · 4,1652 postsخُطى تَوَّاقة.. ㅤ
@khuta_ra7ila · 18,2082 postsرُوحٌ مُهَاجِرَةٌ.
@Mhaajirah · 1,8242 posts•• مُلْتَقَى النّساء السّلفيات 🌷
@moultaqua_alsalafiyat · 64,9032 postsالقرآن الكريم { وَأَنصِتُوا لَعَلَّكُمْ تُرْحَمُونَ }
@abo_algody · 3,6871 post{ أَلَا بِذِكْرِ اللَّهِ تَطْمَئِنُّ القُلوب }
@Al_Islam_dinouna · 5,0511 postولا تـهنوا ولا تـحزنوا
@alhomsy2005 · 5,5861 postاللَّهُمّ جنتك.
@allahomajantk · 81,2381 post- خواطِر من القلب -
@mn_al_klb · 41,5261 postقصص الصلاة على النبيﷺ
@rsoulallh · 8,7281 postسَنا الثُّرَيّا ||•☁️
@sanaAlthurayya · 4061 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@sllllo8 · 813#1
@rayhanaljinah · 1,179#2
@whispers77 · 8,025#3
@sss_muk · 5,194#4
@Afra_1239 · 588#5
@maallah11 · 8,316#6
@piiccture · 5,690#7
@tlults · 349#8
@eii8le · 4,101#9
@cloud_a6 · 40,697#10
@a8yia8 · 5,813#11
@Nabbeedd · 1,545#12
@l11lq · 42,203#13
@rl_974 · 11,731#14
@Sar_1410 · 23,722#15
@eee_64 · 10,028#16
@wllllPll · 1,419#17
@httpsusername2000 · 4,035#18
@kemt_tohr · 35,347#19
@awjaabadwyaj · 810#20
@Loreva2 · 3,103#21
@life_a0 · 37,452#22
@moon_07k · 42,382#23
@anw_a2 · 1,136#24
@soul_550 · 39,912#25
@lii48i · 2,728#26
@MLLDC · 2,631#27
@iliil9 · 18,961#28
@pink_letters_0 · 197,894#29
@YodbrAlamr · 2,391#30
@sabah_kahwt · 9,880#31
@sadka_jareea · 6,061#32
@sar_090 · 4,600#33
@Cocktjjhj · 14,233#34
@Sonan9 · 5,285#35
@tawa_qa · 692#36
@meljfyds · 36,456#37
@hazin2828 · 5,535#38
@for_us1 · 17,181#39
@BooksPddf · 2,671#40
@Z2062001 · 18,521#41
@anees_wehdate · 3,740#42
@Amal_Alenezi1 · 542#43
@Hasmgry · 1,743#44
@ezxxxxe · 714#45
@Butterflyhf · 14,163#46
@alllhoooby · 1,108#47
@zoze500 · 31,008#48
@quran07S · 735#49
@sky_07k · 40,233#50
@slowaaAmmar · 445#51
@Joj551414 · 1,125#52
@aes_a339e · 52,242#53
@houda1144 · 407 (as read 24 August 2026)#54
@neeol00 · 1,120#55
@dfgbkh · 27,307#56
@Quran_909 · 4,903#57
@Hazme2020 · 21,209#58
@cciiaa_a0 · 41,890#59
@ta3etalah · 1,010#60
@hthp0778 · 870#61
@qwertyuiopsadg · 485#62
@mohamedabdulrzak · 1,463#63
@aqb_as · 845#64
@r_atharr12 · 2,071#65
@evinaleskeri · 1,099#66
@vct98Y2OTQ8 · 1,313#67
@P_HSHS2 · 12,856#68
@SW1706 · 906#69
@u58ii · 742#70
@kurdi_arabic03 · 2,939#71
@Thefragranceofwords · 2,194#72
@Hazaian · 2,545#73
@rotxoi · 2,189#74
@s_mois20 · 2,719#75
@Tallinn16 · 2,012#76
@Y_R_Y · 3,041#77
@ryahenaljnan1 · 12,552#78
@cviiz9 · 3,768#79
@QIYIR2 · 3,224#80
@MOSLIMAA123 · 3,208#81
@arshef_anashed · 1,953#82
@Too_Allaah · 20,619#83
@Shaa_29 · 1,867#84
@Senior2027 · 1,909#85
@m_ald77 · 1,098#86
@mdrasat · 1,215 (as read 24 August 2026)#87
@Mstol · 2,024#88
@Hudaalhirby · 8,865#89
@Windowlife · 1,645#90
@nookt63 · 1,787#91
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@moon_07k · 42,382
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 August 2026
@soul_550 · 39,912
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
@cloud_a6 · 40,697
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
@life_a0 · 37,452
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 1 September 2026
@l11lq · 42,203
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
@kemt_tohr · 35,347
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@sky_07k · 40,233
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 August 2026
@Sar_1410 · 23,722
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 September 2026
@cciiaa_a0 · 41,890
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
@zoze500 · 31,008
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 7 September 2026
@aes_a339e · 52,242
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مواساة لقلبك | ☁️❤️” (@heart_a0), 55,541 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/heart_a0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.